Construction Robotics

, Volume 2, Issue 1–4, pp 53–65 | Cite as

Robotic concrete surface finishing: a moldless approach to creating thermally tuned surface geometry for architectural building components using Profile-3D-Printing

  • Joshua BardEmail author
  • Dana Cupkova
  • Newell Washburn
  • Garth Zeglin
Original Paper


This paper focuses on describing a novel hybrid concrete printing/casting process we term Profile-3D-Printing. Profile-3D-Printing is an additive/subtractive manufacturing process that combines deposition of concrete for rough layup with precision tooling for surface finishing of architectural building components commonly found in the architectural precast industry. Our research team from Architecture, the Robotics Institute, and Material Science invented this novel hybrid manufacturing process for robotically printing architectural facade panels with complex surface geometries. This effort was motivated by previously validated research focused on calibrating the thermal exchange rate of vertical surface geometries for the purpose of improving both the esthetic and thermodynamic performance of passive heating and cooling systems in buildings. Our hybrid approach to concrete 3D printing is unique because it combines high-volume material deposition, multi-resolution surface finishing, and the ability for high customization without significant increases in production time. Our project will significantly advance systems integration between energy-based building performance design and advance additive manufacturing, enabling precast concrete suppliers to design and manufacture innovative architectural products with added value for end users in energy savings. This project serves as a template for other industries to adopt hybrid additive manufacturing systems to transform traditionally mold-based approaches. The goal of our project is to develop and test robotic 3D-printing systems that enable customization for high-resolution parts. Hybrid additive manufacturing (Hybrid-AM) enables automated tooling of soft and phase-changing materials to achieve fine feature resolution and finish quality independent of print nozzle size. Currently, speed of printing, control of finish quality, and flexibility of application are three of the most significant barriers for industries seeking to adopt additive manufacturing for part production. This project highlights how Hybrid-AM techniques, built on robotic work cells, address these challenges to enable customization of value-added products.


Additive manufacturing High-performance design Digital concrete Thermal performance Robotic fabrication 



The authors acknowledge Carnegie Mellon University Manufacturing Futures Initiative TAKTL.


  1. ACI Committee, American Concrete Institute, and International Organization for Standardization (1988) Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction (ACI 302.1R-20) and commentary. American Concrete InstituteGoogle Scholar
  2. Bard J, Mankouche S, Schulte M (2013) Morphfaux. Rob|Arch 2012. Springer, Vienna. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cupkova D, Azel N (2015) Mass regimes: geometric actuation of thermal behavior. Int J Archit Comput 13(2):169–193. (Editor: Dr. David Jason Gerber, Multi-Science Publishing Company) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cupkova D, Promoppatum P (2017) Modulating thermal mass behavior through surface figuration. ACADIA 2017 disciplines and disruptions: 37th annual conference proceedings of the Association of Computer Aided Design in Architecture, MIT, Boston, MA, pp 202–211Google Scholar
  5. Cupkova D, Yao S, Azel N (2015) Morphologically controlled thermal rate of ultra high performance concrete. In: Sabin JE, PazGutierrez M, Santangelo C (eds) MRS proceedings 1800, adaptive architecture and programmable matter—next generation building skins and systems from nano to macro. Cambridge Journals Online.
  6. Hack N, Lauer W, Hack N (2014) Mesh-mould: robotically fabricated spatial meshes as reinforced concrete formwork. Archit Des 84(3):44–53Google Scholar
  7. Holman JP (2010) Heat transfer. McGraw-hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Khoshnevis Behrokh (2004) Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr 13:5–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Le TT, Austin SA, Lim S, Buswell RA, Gibb AGF, Thorpe A (2011) High-performance printing concrete for freeform building components. In: Fib Symposium Prague 2011, concrete engineering for excellence and efficiency, 8–10 Jun 2011, Prague, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  10. Leemann A, Winnefeld F (2007) The effect of viscosity modifying agents on mortar and concrete. Cement Concr Compos 29(5):341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lim S, Buswell RA, Le TT, Austin SA, Gibb AGF, Thorpe T (2012) Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Autom Constr 21(1):262–268. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marar K, Eren Ö (2011) Effect of cement content and water/cement ratio on fresh concrete properties without admixtures. Int J Phys Sci 6(24):5752–5765Google Scholar
  13. Marchon D, Juilland P, Gallucci E, Frunz L, Flatt RJ (2017) Molecular and submolecular scale effects of comb-copolymers on tri-calcium silicate reactivity: toward molecular design. J Am Ceram Soc 100(3):817–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mehta P, Monteiro PJ (2006) Concrete: microstructure, properties and materials. Mc-Graw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Soar R, Andreen D (2012) The role of additive manufacturing and physiomimetic computational design for digital construction. Archit Des 82(2):126–135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Spahr R, Johnston D (2014) The New “Guide to Formed Concrete Surfaces”. Concr Int 36(6):30–32Google Scholar
  17. Wangler T, Lloret E, Reiter L, Hack N, Gramazio F, Kohler M, Bernhard M et al (2016) Digital concrete: opportunities and challenges. RILEM Tech Lett 1:67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yamada K, Ogawa S, Hanehara S (2001) Controlling of the adsorption and dispersing force of polycarboxylate-type superplasticizer by sulfate ion concentration in aqueous phase. Cem Concr Res 31(3):375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yao L-S (2006) Natural convection along a vertical complex wavy surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf 49:281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang GQ, Mondesir W, Martinez C, Li X, Fuhlbrigge TA, Bheda H (2015) Robotic additive manufacturing along curved surface—a step towards free-form fabrication. In: Robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), 2015 IEEE international conference, IEEE, pp 721–726Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations