Advertisement

Construction Robotics

, Volume 2, Issue 1–4, pp 41–51 | Cite as

Digital fabrication with natural composites

Design and development towards sustainable manufacturing
  • Stylianos Dritsas
  • Samuel E. P. Halim
  • Yadunund Vijay
  • Naresh G. Sanandiya
  • Javier G. Fernandez
Original Paper
  • 165 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of the research work, an overview thereof presented here, is to create a new digital manufacturing technology with an emphasis on its sustainability characteristics. We designed a family of natural composite materials comprised of exclusively renewable, widely available, biodegradable, and low-cost components. Their physical and mechanical properties closely resemble those of high-density synthetic foams and low-density natural timbers. They are produced without inclusion of petrochemical products or harmful solvents and adhesives, often associated with adverse human and environmental effects. We designed a material extrusion system based on additive manufacturing principles similar to the Fused Deposition Modeling and the Direct Ink Writing methods. The mechanical system used is comprised of a mobile industrial robotic unit, a viscous liquid transport, and dispensing sub-system and programmable control logic. We performed extensive modeling and testing of material properties with the objective of tightly integrating material behavior with manufacturing. We developed design software for direct transition from design to production, including support scaffold generation for accelerated curing by evaporation and predictive models for process parameter control. To address the challenge of scale, we approached the fabrication process from a hybrid perspective including additive, net-zero-change, and subtractive operations. Early proof-of-concept demonstrators offers encouraging results towards manufacturing with two of the most abundant and widely distributed natural materials on earth. We believe that, with persistent effort of controlling the innate variability of natural materials and tighter integration with contemporary fabrication methods through predictive computational modeling, this process has very strong potential for a significant impact on product design, general manufacturing, and the building construction industry.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Natural composite materials Industrial robotics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the SUTD-MIT International Design Centre, the Digital Manufacturing and Design centre, and the National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Cluster of Singapore for supporting this research work. In addition, we would like to thank Gammon Construction Pte Ltd for assisting in the development of the steel-reinforced concrete prototype.

References

  1. Bard J, Mankouche S, Schulte M (2012) Morphfaux: recovering architectural plaster by developing custom robotic tools. In: Brell-Çokcan S, Braumann J (eds) Proceedings on robotic fabrication in architecture, art, and design. Springer, Vienna, pp 139–142Google Scholar
  2. Bartnicki-Garcia S (1968) Cell wall chemistry, morphogenesis, and taxonomy of fungi. Annu Rev Microbiol 22:87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12(4):214–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dritsas S (2016) An advanced parametric modelling library for architectural and engineering design. In: Proceedings of CAADRIA, pp 611–620Google Scholar
  5. Dritsas S, Soh GS (2018) Building robotics design for construction: design considerations and principles for mobile systems. Constr Robot.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41693-018-0010-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunn K, Wozniak O’Connor D, Nemela M, Ulacco G (2016) Free form clay deposition in custom generated molds, producing sustainable fabrication processes. In: Reinhardt D, Saunders R, Burry J (eds) Proceedings on robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design. Springer, Cham, pp 316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandez GJ, Ingber ED (2012) Unexpected strength and toughness in composites inspired by insect cuticle. Adv Mater 24(4):480–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandez GJ, Ingber ED (2014) Manufacturing of large-scale objects using biodegradable chitosan bioplastic. Macromol Mater Eng 299(8):932–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandez GJ, Mills AC, Samitier J (2009) Complex, micro-structured, 3D surfaces using chitosan biopolymer. Small 5(5):614–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franke R, Roffael E (1998) Recycling of particle and fiberboards (MDF). Holz als Roh und Werkstoff 56(1):79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman J, Kim H, Mesa O (2014) Experiments in additive clay depositions, woven clay. In: McGee W, Ponce de Leon M (eds) Proceedings on robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design. Springer, Cham, pp 261–272Google Scholar
  12. Gardinger BJ, Janssen RS (2014) FreeFab: development of a construction-scale robotic formwork 3D printer. In: McGee W, Ponce de Leon M (eds) Proceedings on robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design. Springer, Cham, pp 131–146Google Scholar
  13. Gramazio F, Kohler M (2018) Procedural landscapes, architecture and digital Fabrication. http://www.dfab.arch.ethz.ch/web/d/lehre/211.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2018
  14. Haykin S (2009) Neural networks and learning machines, 3rd edn. Pearson Education Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015 (2015) (ASTM F2792) Additive manufacturing: general principles: terminology. https://www.iso.org/standard/69669.html
  16. Khoshnevis B (2004) Automated construction by contour crafting-related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr 13:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lam CXF, Mo XM, Teoh SH, Hutmacher DW (2002) Scaffold development using 3D printing with a starch-based polymer. Mater Sci Eng 20:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis AJ (2006) Direct Ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv Funct Mater 16:2193–2204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lei H, Pizzi A, Navarette P, Rigolet S, Redl S, Wagner A (2010) Gluten protein adhe-sives for wood panels. Wood adhesives. Koninklijke Brill NV, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  20. Lim S, Buswell RA, Le TT, Austing SA, Gibb AGF, Thorpe T (2012) Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Autom Constr 21(1):262–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu ZJ, Wu Q, McNabb SH Jr (2000) Chemical coupling in wood fiber and polymer composites: a review of coupling agents and treatments. Soc Wood Sci Technol State Art Rev 32–1:88–104Google Scholar
  22. Manyika J, Chui M, Dobbs Bughin JR, Bisson P, Marrs A (2013) Disruptive technologies: advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy, vol 180. McKinsey Global Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Materialise (2016) Materials. http://www.materialise.com/en/manufacturing/materials/. Accessed 10 Feb 2016
  24. Martin O, Averous L (2001) Poly(lactic acid): plasticization and properties of biodegradable multiphase systems. Polymer 42:6209–6219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mogas-Soldevilla L, Duro-Royo J, Oxman N (2014) 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Water Based Fabr 1:141–151Google Scholar
  26. Montgomery CD (2008) Introduction to statistical quality control, 6th edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  27. Montgomery CD (2012) Design and analysis experiments, 8th edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  28. Pizzi A (2006) Recent developments in eco-efficient bio-based adhesives for wood bond-ing: opportunities and issues. J Adhes Sci Technol 8:829–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reiterer A, Lichtenegger H, Tschegg S, Fratzl P (1999) Experimental evidence for a mechanical function of the cellulose microfibril angle in wood cell walls. Philos Mag A 79:2173–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Royal Academy of Engineering (2013) Additive manufacturing: opportunities and constraints. Royal Academy of Engineering, London. https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/additive-manufacturing Google Scholar
  31. Sanandiya N, Vijay Y, Dimopoulou M, Dritsas S, Fernandez GJ (2018) Large-scale additive manufacturing with bioinspired cellulosic materials. Sci Rep 8:8642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stuecker NJ, Miller EJ, Ferrizz ER, Mudd EJ, Cesarano J (2004) Advanced support structures for enhanced catalytic activity. Ind Eng Chem Res 43(1):51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tan R, Sia CK, Tee YK, Koh K, Dritsas S (2017) Developing composite wood for 3D-Printing. In: Proceedings of CAADRIA, pp 831–840Google Scholar
  34. Vijay Y (2018) Advanced manufacturing with natural composites. Masters of Science Thesis, Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and DesignGoogle Scholar
  35. Vijay Y, Sanandiya N, Dritsas S, Fernandez GJ (2018) Control process settings for large-scale additive manufacturing with natural composites. In: Proceedings of ASME, V004T05A019Google Scholar
  36. 3D Systems Inc (2016) Tree-D printing in wood. http://www.3dsystems.com/blog/foc/freedom-of-creation-develops-tree-d-printing. Accessed 12 Nov 2016
  37. 3D Systems Inc (2018) Materials. http://www.3dsystems.com/materials/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Architecture and Sustainable DesignSingapore University of Technology and DesignSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations