Advertisement

Data-Enabled Quantitative Corrosion Monitoring using Ultrasound

  • Fangxin ZouEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Corrosion is the most pervasive degradation mechanism of engineering infrastructure. It has caused numerous disastrous events that resulted in devastating societal, environmental and financial consequences. There exist numerous standard techniques for corrosion monitoring. Among these techniques, ultrasonic testing stands out as a non-intrusive and straightforward approach. Component wall-thickness loss rate (WTLR) is an intrinsic parameter of corrosion processes. Accurate and rapid determination of WTLRs from continuous ultrasonic wall-thickness loss (WTL) measurements is a critical aspect of effective corrosion control. In this paper, a statistics-based method that enables automatic detection of changes in WTLR will be introduced. The detection method further extends the application of ultrasonic corrosion monitoring to more sophisticated corrosion processes that involve multiple rates. Statistical analysis of ultrasonic WTL measurements that were acquired by a state-of-the-art laboratory setup shows that changes in WTLR of 0.1–0.2 mm/year can be determined within 1–2 h.

Keywords

Non-destructive testing Structural health monitoring Corrosion monitoring Ultrasound Piezoelectric Generalised likelihood algorithm 

References

  1. 1.
    The United States Cost of Corrosion Study. 2002, CC TechnologiesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Liu et al., Applications of a nanocomposite-inspired in-situ broadband ultrasonic sensor to acousto-ultrasonics-based passive and active structural health monitoring. Ultrasonics 78, 166–174 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gollom, M. 2014. Pipeline rupture: Alberta resident unaware of 2009 blast. Available from: http://www.cbc.ca/news/pipeline-rupture-alberta-resident-unaware-of-2009-blast-1.2525030
  4. 4.
    Y. Hou et al., Monitoring of carbon steel corrosion by use of electrochemical noise and recurrence quantification analysis. Corros Sci 112, 63–72 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Shahidi, M. Gholamhosseinzadeh, Electrochemical evaluation of AA6061 aluminum alloy corrosion in citric acid solution without and with chloride ions. J Electroanal Chem 757, 8–17 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Shitanda et al., Screen-printed atmospheric corrosion monitoring sensor based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Sensors Actuators B Chem 139(2), 292–297 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Dunnettand, G. Whillock, Intergranular corrosion of stainless steels: a method to determine the long-term corrosion rate of plate surfaces from short-term coupon tests. Corrosion 59(3), 274–283 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Reiber, J.F. Ferguson, M.M. Benjamin, An improved method for corrosion-rate measurement by weight loss. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 80(11), 41–46 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Honarvar et al., Ultrasonic monitoring of erosion/corrosion thinning rates in industrial piping systems. Ultrasonics 53(7), 1251–1258 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Rommetveit, T.F. Johansen, R. Johnsen, A combined approach for high-resolution corrosion monitoring and temperature compensation using ultrasound. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 59(11), 2843–2853 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F.B. Cegla et al., High-temperature (> 500 °C) wall thickness monitoring using dry-coupled ultrasonic waveguide transducers. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 58(1) (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Zou, F.B. Cegla, High accuracy ultrasonic monitoring of electrochemical processes. Electrochem. Commun. 82, 134–138 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. Zou, F.B. Cegla, High-accuracy ultrasonic corrosion rate monitoring. Corrosion 74(3), 372–382 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Zou, F.B. Cegla, On quantitative corrosion rate monitoring with ultrasound. J Electroanal Chem 812, 115–121 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Galvagni, P. Cawley, Reliable identification of damage growth using guided wave SHM systems. Le Cam, Vincent and Mevel, Laurent and Schoefs, Franck. EWSHM - 7th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Nantes, July 2014Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Galvagni, Pipeline health monitoring, Thesis, Imperiail College London, 2013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Division of Aeronautical and Aviation EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations