Ethical Issues concerning Legislation in Late-Term Abortions in India

  • Aiswarya SasiEmail author
Original Paper


Late-term abortions (after 20 weeks of gestation) are an issue of immense debate in India, where the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 permits abortions only up to 20 weeks of gestation. In special situations, such as pregnancy arising out of rape especially in the case of minors and the late diagnosis of congenital anomalies, there are no clear guidelines on the legal protocol that is to be followed, often resulting in a lack of consistency in terms of legal decision-making, as well as undue prolongation of legal procedures. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act prohibits late-term abortions on the basis of personhood and viability of the foetus, to reduce sex-selective abortions and as it considers such abortions to be unsafe. However, a legal prohibition of late-term abortions does not prevent them, and this has led to a surge in the number of illegal, unsafe abortions that are detrimental to the health of women. There is also physical, mental and financial distress to women who are forced to continue their pregnancy, coupled with a lack of governmental support for the same. In comparison of India’s abortion laws with Singapore’s, which are more liberal, and Philippines, which are more restrictive, liberalisation of abortion laws appears to have a better outcome in reducing the incidence of unsafe abortions. This paper argues that the way forward is to liberalise the laws in terms of not only extending the gestational limit to at least 24 weeks but also making exceptions allowing no gestational limit in special cases that warrant them, such as rape victims and late foetal anomalies. The laws, drafted and implemented in consultation with medical professionals in the field, must also be lucid and not leave any room for misinterpretation by courts and health care providers.


Abortion Legislation Late-term abortions India MTP Act 1971 Ethics of abortion 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.


The views expressed in this paper are personal views and not the views of the institution to which the author is affiliated.


  1. BBC News. 2017. Indian court rejects abortion for 10-year-old rape victim. British Broadcasting Corporation, 28 July 2017. Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  2. Center for Reproductive Rights. 2008. The World’s Abortion Laws. New York, NY: Center for Reproductive Rights. Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  3. Center for Reproductive Rights. 2010. Facts on abortion in the Philippines: criminalization and a general ban on abortion. New York, NY: Center for Reproductive Rights. Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  4. CIA. 2015. The world factbook: maternal mortality ratio. Central Intelligence Agency. Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  5. Chen A.J., S.C. Emmanuel, S.L. Ling, and S.B. Kwa. 1985. Legalized abortion: the Singapore experience. Studies in Family Planning 16 (3): 170. Scholar
  6. Chettiar, Rajan. 2018. The Law on Abortion in Singapore. Asia Law Network, 18 September 2018. Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  7. Childline India. n.d. Childline 1098. Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  8. Emandi, Rango Rao. 2017. Right to life of foetus – verification of laws in the context of female foeticide. International Journal of Law 3 (2): 33–39.Google Scholar
  9. Fujisawa, Hidetoshi, Jo Kitawaki, Koichi Iwasa, and Hideo Honjo. 2006. New ultrasonographic criteria for the prenatal diagnosis of Chiari type 2 malformation. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 85 (12): 1426–1429. Scholar
  10. Ghosh, Abantika. 2017. Abortion law amendments on hold. Indian Express, 8 June 2017. Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  11. Gupta, Mrinal, and Surabhi Sagar. 2017. A painful legacy-status of children born out of rape. Journal on Contemporary Issues of Law 3 (8).Google Scholar
  12. Hussain, Rubina, and Lawrence B. Finer. 2013. Unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion in the Philippines: context and consequences. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute. . Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  13. Jacobson, Thomas W., and William. Robert Johnston. 2019. Abortion Worldwide Report. Global Life Campaign, last updated 8 July 2019. . Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  14. Kokra Sonali. 2017. Why is India’s abortion law failing its women on so many fronts? Huffington Post, last updated 5 August 2017. Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  15. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 1971. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
  16. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Maternal Health Division, Government of India. 2014. Draft Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Bill 2014.
  17. Ministry of Social and Family Development. 2019. Singapore’s demographic: sex ratio-males to females.
  18. Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation. 2019. Area and population-statistical year book India.
  19. National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. 2016. Crime against women: crime in India 2012 statistics.Google Scholar
  20. Siddhivinayak, S. Hirve. 2004. Abortion law, policy and services in India: a critical review. Reproductive Health Matters 12 (24): 114–121. Scholar
  21. Singapore Statutes Online. 2007. Termination of Pregnancy Act (Chapter 324).
  22. Singh, Susheela, Chander Shekhar, Rajib Acharya, Ann M. Moore, Melissa Stillman, Manas R. Pradhan, Jennifer J. Frost, Harihar Sahoo, Manoj Alagarajan, Rubina Hussain, Aparna Sundaram, Michael Vlassoff, Shveta Kalyanwala, Alyssa Browne. 2018. The incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy in India, 2015. Lancet Global Health 6 (1): e111–e120. Scholar
  23. Sinha, Bhadra. 2017. SC denies permission to abort 26-week-old foetus suffering from Down’s Syndrome. Hindustan Times, 1 March 2017. Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  24. State Legal Services Authority, UT, Chandigarh. n.d. The Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PNDT) Act & Rules.
  25. Wiegel, Moira. 2017. How ultrasound became political. The Atlantic, 24 January 2017. Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
  26. World Health Organization. 2008. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2003. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  27. Writing Law. 2018. Chapter XVI (312-318) of IPC-of the causing of miscarriage, of injuries to unborn children, of the exposure of infants, and of the concealment of births.

Copyright information

© National University of Singapore and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. John’s Medical CollegeBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations