Advertisement

Historical Archaeology

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 73–85 | Cite as

Flat Ontologies, Cosmopolitanism, and Space at Carolina Forts

  • Charles R. CobbEmail author
Original Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

English forts in the Carolina Colony embodied the ongoing struggle between the ambitions of imperial impositions and the aspirations of frontier autonomy. This tension is acutely reflected in the spatial organization of forts. Whereas colonial authorities sought to separate Europeans, Africans, and Native Americans through the formal segregation of the built environment, life on the frontier encouraged a fluidity in space and identity. The theoretical construct of flat ontologies can be used to explore how frontier forts were a catalyst for complex and emergent spatial relations that subverted hierarchical space. Archaeological data from early 18th-century forts on the Carolina frontier exemplify the connective processes of flat ontologies that blurred space and identity.

Keywords

colonial forts multiscalar archaeology cosmopolitanism Carolina flat ontologies 

Extracto

Los fuertes ingleses en la colonia de Carolina encarnaban la lucha continua entre las ambiciones de imposiciones imperiales y las aspiraciones de autonomía en la frontera. Esta tensión se refleja agudamente en la organización del espacio en las fortalezas. Mientras que las autoridades coloniales buscaban separar a los europeos, africanos y americanos nativos a través de la segregación formal del entorno construido, la vida en la frontera alentaba una fluidez en el espacio y la identidad. La construcción teórica de ontologías planas puede utilizarse para explorar de qué manera los fuertes fronterizos fueron un catalizador para las relaciones espaciales complejas emergentes que subvertían el espacio jerárquico. Los datos arqueológicos de las fortalezas en la frontera de Carolina desde principios del siglo XVIII ejemplifican los procesos conectivos de ontologías planas que desdibujaban el espacio y la identidad.

Résumé

Les forts anglais de la colonie de la Caroline personnifient l’opposition continue entre les ambitions des impositions impériales et les aspirations de l’autonomie pionnière. Cette tension est très bien représentée dans l’organisation spatiale desdits forts. Tandis que les autorités coloniales tentaient de diviser les Européens, Africains et Amérindiens en scindant formellement leur environnement construit, la vie au front pionnier favorisait une fluidité d’espace et d’identité. La trame théorique des ontologies linéaires peut être utilisée pour explorer la façon dont les forts des fronts pionniers furent des catalyseurs pour l’émergence de relations spatiales complexes ayant renversé l’espace hiérarchique. Des données archéologiques provenant des forts de la Caroline du début du 18e siècle démontrent les processus de connexion desdites ontologies linéaires qui obscurcissent à la fois l’espace et l’identité.

Notes

Acknowledgments:

I am grateful to Mark Tveskov and Chelsea Rose for inviting me to participate in this collection, and my contribution greatly benefitted from their very helpful commentary. Likewise, Laurie Wilkie had important constructive criticisms, and I appreciate her useful insights. A broad and enthusiastic thanks goes out to all of my former colleagues in South Carolina who patiently introduced me to the archaeology, history, and methods of addressing colonial forts, especially Chester DePratter, Steve Smith, and Jim Legg. I also appreciate the great learning experience of working alongside former students on these issues, notably Stephanie Sapp and James Stewart.

References

  1. Bailey, Geoff 1983 Concepts of Time in Quaternary Prehistory. Annual Review of Anthropology 12:165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, Geoff 2007 Time Perspectives, Palimpsests and the Archaeology of Time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26(2):198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binford, Lewis R. 1980 Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: Hunter–Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 45(1):4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, James W. 1987 Evolution of the Onondaga Iroquois: Accommodating Change, 1500–1655. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  5. Braudel, Fernand 1995 The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, 2 vols., Siân Reynolds, translator. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  6. Braund, Kathryn E. Holland 1993 Deerskins and Duffels: Creek Indian Trade with Anglo-America, 1685–1815. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  7. Cobb, Charles R., and Chester B. DePratter 2016 Carolina’s Southern Frontier: Edge of a New World Order. In Archaeology in South Carolina: Exploring the Hidden Heritage of the Palmetto State, Adam King, editor, pp. 43–61. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
  8. Cobb, Charles R., and Stephanie M. Sapp 2014 Imperial Anxiety and the Dissolution of Colonial Space and Practice at Fort Moore, South Carolina. In Rethinking Colonial Pasts through Archaeology, Neal Ferris, Rodney Harrison, and Michael Wilcox, editors, pp. 212–231. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Cobb, Charles R., Chester B. DePratter, and J. Christopher Gilliam 2012 Savannah Valley Archaeology Project. Final Report to the National Science Foundation. Manuscript, South Carolina Institute for Archaeology and Anthropology, Columbia.Google Scholar
  10. Comaroff, John, and Jean Comaroff 1992 Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  11. Crane, Verner Winslow 2004 The Southern Frontier, 1670–1732. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
  12. DePratter, Chester B. 2003 The Savannah River Valley A.D. 1540 to 1715. In The Savannah River Valley to 1865, Ashley Callahan, editor, pp. 15–27. University of Georgia Museum of Art, Athens.Google Scholar
  13. Diouff, Mamadou 2000 The Senegalese Murid Trade Diaspora and the Making of a Vernacular Cosmopolitanism. Public Culture 12(3):679–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easterby, James H. (editor) 1951 The Journal of the Commons House of Assembly: November 10, 1736–June 7, 1739 . Historical Commission of South Carolina, Columbia.Google Scholar
  15. Edgar, Walter 1998 South Carolina: A History. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
  16. Elliott, Daniel T. 2012 Yuchi in the Lower Savannah River Valley: Historical Context and Archaeological Confirmation. In Yuchi Indian Histories before the Removal Era, Jason Baird Jackson, editor, pp. 73–100. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  17. Ethridge, Robbie 2003 Creek Country: The Creek Indians and Their World. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Ethridge, Robbie, and Sheri M. Shuck-Hall (editors) 2009 Mapping the Mississippian Shatter Zone: The Colonial Indian Slave Trade and Regional Instability in the American South. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  19. Ferris, Neal 2009 The Archaeology of Native-Lived Colonialism: Challenging History in the Great Lakes. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  20. Gallay, Alan 2002 The Indian Slave Trade: The Rise of the English Empire in the American South, 1670–1717. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  21. Giddens, Anthony 1984 The Constitution of Society. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  22. Gosden, Chris 2001 Postcolonial Archaeology: Issues of Culture, Identity, and Knowledge. In Archaeological Theory Today, Ian Hodder, editor, pp. 241–261. Polity Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Gougeon, Ramie A., and Maureen S. Myers (editors) 2015 Archaeological Perspectives on the Southern Appalachians: A Multiscalar Approach. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  24. Harding, Jan 2005 Rethinking the Great Divide: Long-Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event. Norwegian Archaeological Review 38(2):88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoffman, Paul E. 2002 Florida’s Frontiers. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  26. Horning, Audrey 2011 Subduing Tendencies? Colonialism, Capitalism, and Comparative Atlantic Archaeologies. In The Archaeology of Capitalism in Colonial Contexts: Post-Colonial Historical Archaeologies, Sarah K. Croucher and Lindsey Weiss, editors, pp. 65–84. Springer, New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ivers, Larry E. 1970 Colonial Forts of South Carolina, 1670–1755. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, Martin 2009 Phase Space: Geographic Relational Thinking, and Beyond. Progress in Human Geography 33(4):487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LaViolette, Adria 2008 Swahili Cosmopolitanism in Africa and the Indian Ocean World, A.D. 600–1500. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress 4(1):24–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawson, John 1967 A New Voyage to Carolina. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  31. Le Roy Ladurie, Emmanuel 1979 Montaillou: The Promised Land of Error, Barbara Bray, translator. Random House, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  32. Liebmann, Matthew, and Uzma Z. Rizvi (editors) 2008 Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique. AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  33. Lightfoot, Kent 2005 Indians, Missionaries, and Merchants: The Legacy of Colonial Encounters on the California Frontiers. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  34. Loren, Diana DiPaolo 2011 Fear, Desire, and Material Strategies in Colonial Louisiana. In The Archaeology of Colonialism Intimate Encounters and Sexual Effects, Barbara Voss and Eleanor Conlin Casella, editors, pp. 105–121. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lucas, Gavin 2008 Time and the Archaeological Event. Cambridge Journal of Archaeology 18(1):59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lydon, Jane, and Uzma Z. Rizvi (editors) 2010 Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
  37. Maness, Harold S. 1986 Forgotten Outpost: Fort Moore and Savannah Town, 1685–1765. BPB, Pickens, SC.Google Scholar
  38. Marston, Sallie A., John Paul Jones III, and Keith Woodward 2005 Human Geography without Scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, new ser., 30(4):416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDowell, William 1955 Journal of the Commissioners of the Indian Trade, 1710–1718, Vol. 1. South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia.Google Scholar
  40. McGuire, Randall 2006 Marxism and Capitalism in Historical Archaeology. In The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology, Dan Hicks and Mary C. Beaudry, editors, pp. 123–142. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meskell, Lynn (editor) 2009 Cosmopolitan Archaeologies. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  42. Michie, James L. 1989 The Discovery of Old Fort Congaree. University of South Carolina, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, Research Manuscript Series No. 193. Columbia.Google Scholar
  43. Mignolo, Walter 2000 The Many Faces of Cosmo-polis: Border Thinking and Critical Cosmopolitanism. Public Culture 12(3):721–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Murray, Timothy 1999 A Return to the ‘Pompeii Premise.’ In Time and Temporality, Timothy Murray, editor, pp. 8–27. Routledge, London, UK.Google Scholar
  45. Oatis, Steven J. 2004 A Colonial Complex: South Carolina’s Frontiers in the Era of the Yamasee War, 1680–1730. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  46. Patterson, Thomas 2008 A Brief History of Postcolonial Theory and Implications for Archaeology. In Archaeology and the Post-Colonial Critique, Matthew Liebmann and Uzma Z. Rizva, editors, pp. 21–34. AltaMira Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  47. Polhemus, Richard 1971 Excavation at Fort Moore-Savanno Town (38AK4&5). SCIAA Notebook 3(6):132–133. Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
  48. Ramsey, William L. 2003 “Something Cloudy in Their Looks”: The Origins of the Yamasee War Reconsidered. Journal of American History 90(1):44–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richard, François 2013 Thinking Through “Vernacular Cosmopolitanisms”: Historical Archaeology in Senegal and the Material Contours of the African Atlantic. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 17(1):40–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sahlins, Marshall 1993 Goodby to Tristes Tropes: Ethnography in the Context of Modern World History. Journal of Modern History 65(1):1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salley, Alexander S. (editor) 1944 Journal of the Commons House of Assembly of South Carolina: June 2, 1724–June 16, 1724. General Assembly of South Carolina, Columbia.Google Scholar
  52. Shackel, Paul A. 2009 The Archaeology of American Labor and Working-Class Life. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, Marvin T. 1987 Archaeology of Aboriginal Culture Change in the Interior Southeast: Depopulation during the Early Historic Period. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, Marvin T. 1989 Aboriginal Population Movements in the Early Historic Period Interior Southeast. In Powhatan's Mantle: Indians in the Colonial Southeast, Peter H. Wood, Gregory Waselkov, and M. Thomas Hatley, editors, pp. 21–34. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  55. South, Stanley 1977 Method and Theory in Historical Archeology. Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  56. Stewart, James A. 2013 Congeries in the Backcountry. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia.Google Scholar
  57. Stewart, James A., and Charles R. Cobb 2018 Fort Congaree: A Cosmopolitan Outpost on the Rim of Empire. Native South 11:29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stoler, Ann L. 2002 Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule . University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  59. Sunley, Peter 2008 Relational Economic Geography: A Partial Understanding or a New Paradigm? Economic Geography 84(1):1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tveskov, Mark, and Amy Cohen 2014 Frontier Forts, Ambiguity, and Manifest Destiny: The Changing Role of Fort Lane in the Cultural Landscape of the Oregon Territory, 1853–1929. In Rethinking Colonial Pasts through Archaeology, N. Ferris, R. Harrison, and M. Wilcox, editors, pp. 191–211. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  61. Voss, Barbara 2008a The Archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Race, Sexuality, and Identity in Colonial San Francisco. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  62. Voss, Barbara 2008b Poor People in Silk Shirts: Dress and Ethnogenesis in Spanish-Colonial San Francisco. Journal of Social Archaeology 8(3):404–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Werbner, Pnina (editor) 2008 Anthropology and the New Cosmopolitanism: Rooted, Feminist and Vernacular Perspectives. Berg, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  64. Wilkie, Laurie A., and Paul Farnsworth 1999 Trade and the Construction of Bahamian Identity: A Multiscalar Exploration. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3(4):283–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Historical Archaeology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida Museum of Natural HistoryUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations