Advertisement

Optimization of Am–Be millicuries neutron source in a small volume cylindrical water tank for NAA

  • Abdul WaheedEmail author
  • M. Ishaq
  • Mahmood Sultan
Original Paper
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The neutron activation analysis (NAA) is a very powerful method for multi-element analysis of samples. NAA technique needs to be developed for low neutron flux in millicuries using the 241Am-Be neutron source.

Aims

To optimize sample and neutron source geometry for maximum γ-ray yield for neutron activation analysis.

Method

Gamma ray neutron activation analysis (NAA) has been set up where a 50-millicurie Am-Be neutron source is available. In this experimental setup, the neutron source is placed at the center of a cylindrical water tank of 40 x 40 cm in xyz plan, and thermal neutrons are produced at a distance of 1.2 cm from the source. The system is used for the activation analysis of sodium carbonate, sodium chloride and copper with the gamma ray emissions of 1.37, 1.73, 2.25 and 2.76 MeV for 24Na and 0.511 MeV for 64Cu having half lives of 15 hrs and 12.9 hrs, respectively. The thermal neutron activation analysis has been demonstrated by placing the samples at about 1.2 cm from the neutron source. HPGe and 3x3 inch NaI(Tl) gamma ray spectrometers have been used for the gamma ray spectrometry of these activated samples with the use of a Marinelli beaker. The geometry of the sample with respect to the neutron source has been optimized for the maximum γ-ray yield in NAA.

Conclusion

The geometry of the sample with respect to the neutron source has been optimized for the maximum γ-ray yield in NAA. The increase in gamma ray flux distribution in the medium of water, due to the neutron source inside the tank, has been observed by a GM detector which is due to the production of short-lived 16N on activation of 16O in water. This system can also be used for prompt γ-ray analysis.

Keywords

Am–Be neutron source Sodium carbonate Copper samples NAA setup NaI(Tl) HPGe spectroscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    K.J. Ellis, In-vivo activation analysis and future prospects. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 169, 291–300 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N.M. Spyrou, Neutron activation analysis challenges: problems and applications in biomedical and other areas. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 239, 59–70 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V.P. Guina, Rapid growth, maturity, current problems, future prospects of NAA. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 244, 23–25 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Z. Revay, T. Belgya, G.L. Molinar. Prompt gamma neutron activation analysis as an active interrogation technique for nuclear materials, in Proceedings of an International Conference on Advances in Destructive and Non-destructive Analysis for Environmental Monitoring and Nuclear Forensics, Karlsruhe, October 2002, IAEA-STI/Pub/1169, (2003) pp. 21–23Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Witkowska, K. Szczepaniak, M. Biziuk, Some applications of neutron activation analysis. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 265, 141–150 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.R. Chettle, Occupational nuclear medicine: trace element analysis of living humans. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 268, 653–661 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.J. Potts, O. Williams Thorpe, M.C. Isaacs, D.W. Wright, High-Precision instrumental neutron activation analysis of geological samples employing simultaneous counting with both planar and coaxial detectors. Chem. Geol. 48, 146–155 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.H. Seabury, B.W. Blackburn, D.L. Chichester, C.J. Wharton, A.J. Caffery, Comparison of DD, DT and Cf252 neutron excitation of light and medium mass nuclei for field PGNAA applications. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 261, 839–844 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.M.V. Raja, A.R. Barron, Neutron activation analysis (NAA) (Chemistry Libre Texts, 2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Sood, R.P. Gardner, T.K. Gray, Steady neutron source measurement method for absorption and scattering in geological samples. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 53(4–5), 603–616 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.A. Naqvi, M.A. Garwan, Validity test design calculations of a PGNAA setup. Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. B 215, 283–291 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.A. Naqvi, M.S. Abdelmonem, G. Al-Misned, H. Al-Ghamdi, New source—moderator geometry to improve performance of 252Cf and 241Am–Be source based PGNAA setups. Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. A 562, 358–364 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Khelifi, P. Bode, A. Amokrane, Flux calculation in LSNAA using 241Am–Be source. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 274(3), 639–642 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Younis, A. Waheed, A.A. Qureshi, S. Manzoor, Thermal neutron flux distribution in a small volume cylindrical water tank. GESJ Phys. 1(15), 94–100 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.D. Glascock, An overview of neutron activation analysis (2014), pp. 3/9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Nuclear Electronics and Nuclear Detection Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for PhysicsQuaid-i-Azam UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Radiation Physics Lab, Physics DepartmentCOMSATS Institute of Information Technology (COMSATS University)IslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Centre for Earthquake Studies, National Centre for PhysicsQAUIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations