Investigation of modified zinc borate glasses doped with BaO as a nuclear radiation-shielding material

  • H. A. SaudiEmail author
  • S. U. El-Kameesy
Original Paper



Radiation protection and detection have been a main interest for researchers. The prepared glass samples were subjected to experimental investigations to evaluate their mechanical and attenuation properties. As a consequence, the values of the mass attenuation coefficient, total electronic cross section, the effective atomic number and an effective electron number were determined and utilized to assess the shielding effectiveness of the investigated glass samples. The mass attenuation coefficients of these samples were calculated theoretically using WinXcom program.


Preparation of glass of borate with zinc and barium can withstand shock, heat and corrosion to be used as a radiation shield.


Glass samples were prepared by melt quenching technique. Density and molar volume measurements were obtained by applying the Archimedes principle. The hardness was measured by using a microhardness tester (Leco AMH 100, USA) for sample indentation. The thermal behavior of the glass samples was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Also, by using a scintillator detector (1.5″ × 1.5″ NaI (Tl)) exposed to 232Th, 137Cs and 60Co gamma ray sources with accuracy range 0.12%.


The investigated glasses have relatively good gamma ray attenuation properties, water resistance ability and thermal stability with increasing barium oxide. So, they can be used in containers for keeping radioactive waste and radioactive sources.


The changes in the molar volume and density show approximately opposite linear trends. Also, μm is dependent on the chemical compositions of glass samples and energy of gamma rays. Good agreement between the experimentally obtained mass attenuation coefficient values and the corresponding theoretical predictions based on the known WinXcom program was observed. Additionally, the effect of gamma irradiation on this glass is minor because its impact on the hardness values and dissolution rate is extremely small.


Borate glasses Shielding properties Hardness Durability 


  1. 1.
    S. Kaur, K.J. Singh, Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. (IJITEE) 2(5), 2278–3075 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Gupta, S.G. Singh, Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 1(2), 59–70 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Singh, A. Kumar, D. Singh, K.S. Thind, G.S. Mudahar, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. B 266(1), 140–146 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Chanthima, J. Kaewkhao, P. Limkitjaroenporn, S. Tuscharoen, S. Kothan, M. Tungjai, S. Kaewjaeng, S. Sarachai, P. Limsuwan, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 137, 72–77 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.U. El-Kameesy, H.A. Saudi, G. Mahmoud, R. Saeed, J. Adv. Phys. 11, 4 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Mauro, Report from: Glass Laboratory, college of Ceramics (Alfred University. Private communication through the internet, Alfred, 2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Özdemir, İ.K. Akbay, H. Uzun, İ.A. Reyhancan, Prog. Nucl. Energy 89, 102–109 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.H. Gong, W.J. Si, Z.D. Guan, Effect of load-dependence of hardness on indentation toughness determination for soda-lime glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 282, 325–328 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Tawansi, E. Ahmed, D. Holland, I.A. GohAar, N.A. El-Shishtawi, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 105(1–2), 78–90 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.A. Saudi, A.G. Mostafa, N. Sheta, S.U. ElKameesy, H.A. Sallam, Phys. B Phys. Condens. Matter 406, 4001–4006 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Wood, Computational methods in reactor shielding (Pergamon, New York, 1982)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Gerward, N. Guilbert, K.B. Jensen, H. Levring, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 60, 23–24 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sukhpal Singh, Ashok Kumar, Devinder Singh, K. Singh, T. Mudahar, S. Gurmel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 266(1), 140–146 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.A. Sallam, H.A. Saudy, World J. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 62–66 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.S. Makarious, I.I. Bashter, Abdo AEl. Sayad, A.M. Sameer Abdul, W.A. Kansouh, Ann. Nucl. Energy. 23, 195 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H.A. Saudi, Appl. Math. Phys. 1(4), 143–146 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.A. Saudy, S. El Mosallamy, S.U. El Kameesy, N. Sheta, A.G. Mostafa, H.A. Sallam, World J. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 9–13 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V.P. Singh, N.M. Badiger, N. Chanthima, J. Kaewkhao, Phys. Chem. 98, 14–21 (2014)ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.H. Hubbell, J. Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 1 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H.A. Saudi, SOP Trans. Appl. Phys. Phys. Chem. 1(1), 29–32 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H.A. Saudi, Am. J. Phys. Appl. 4(6), 140–144 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M.A. Marzouk et al., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 387, 155–160 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. J. Friebele, Radiation effects, in Optical Properties of Glass, ed. by D. R. Uhlmann, N. J. Kreidl (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, 1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Nuclear Electronics and Nuclear Detection Society and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of Science (Girls’ Branch)Al-Azhar UniversityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Faculty of ScienceAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations