Advertisement

Combination of a gamma radiation-based system and the adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for calculating the volume fraction in stratified regime of a three-phase flow

  • G. H. Roshani
  • A. Karami
  • E. NazemiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 238 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Understanding the volume fraction of water-oil-gas three-phase flow is of significant importance in oil and gas industry.

Purpose

The current research attempts to indicate the ability of adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) to forecast the volume fractions in a water-oil-gas three-phase flow system.

Method

The current investigation devotes to measure the volume fractions in the stratified three-phase flow, on the basis of a dual-energy metering system consisting of the 152Eu and 137Cs and one NaI detector using ANFIS. The summation of volume fractions is equal to 100% and is also a constant, and this is enough for the ANFIS just to forecast two volume fractions. In the paper, three ANFIS models are employed. The first network is applied to forecast the oil and water volume fractions. The next to forecast the water and gas volume fractions, and the last to forecast the gas and oil volume fractions. For the next step, ANFIS networks are trained based on numerical simulation data from MCNP-X code.

Results

The accuracy of the nets is evaluated through the calculation of average testing error. The average errors are then compared. The model in which predictions has the most consistency with the numerical simulation results is selected as the most accurate predictor model. Based on the results, the best ANFIS net forecasts the water and gas volume fractions with the mean error of less than 0.8%.

Conclusion

The proposed methodology indicates that ANFIS can precisely forecast the volume fractions in a water-oil-gas three-phase flow system.

Keywords

Stratified regime Three-phase flow Volume fraction Accuracy Fuzzy-based inference system Forecast 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    I.M.M. Babelli, Development of the multiphase meter using gamma densitometer concept, in Proceedings of the International Nuclear Conference (1997), pp. 371–389Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.M. Salgado, L.E.B. Brandao, R. Schirru, C.M.N.A. Pereira, A. Xavier da Silva, R. Ramos, Prediction of volume fractions in three-phase flows using nuclear technique and artificial neural network. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 67, 1812–1818 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.M. Salgado, C.M.N.A. Pereira, R. Schirru, L.E.B. Brandao, Flow regime identification and volume fraction prediction in multiphase flows by means of gamma-ray attenuation and artificial neural networks. Prog. Nucl. Energy 52, 555–562 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.M. Salgado, L.E.B. Brandao, C.M.N.A. Pereira, W.L. Salgado, Salinity independent volume fraction prediction in annular and stratified (water–gas–oil) multiphase flows using artificial neural networks. Prog. Nucl. Energy 76, 17–23 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G.H. Roshani, E. Nazemi, M.M. Roshani, Flow regime independent volume fraction estimation in three-phase flows using dual-energy broad beam technique and artificial neural network. Neural Comput. Appl. 28, 1265 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.H. Roshani, E. Nazemi, M.M. Roshani, Usage of two transmitted detectors with optimized orientation in order to three phase flow metering. Measurement 100, 122–130 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.H. Roshani, E. Nazemi, S.A.H. Feghhi, S. Setayeshi, Flow regime identification and void fraction prediction in two-phase flows based on gamma ray attenuation. Measurement 62, 25–32 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Nazemi, G.H. Roshani, S.A.H. Feghhi, S. Setayeshi, E.E. Zadeh, A. Fatehi, Optimization of a method for identifying the flow regime and measuring void fraction in a broad beam gamma-ray attenuation technique. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 7438–7444 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Nazemi, S.A.H. Feghhi, G.H. Roshani, void fraction prediction in two-phase flows independent of the liquid phase density changes. Radiat. Meas. 68, 49–54 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Nazemi, G.H. Roshani, S.A.H. Feghhi, S. Setayeshi, R. Gholipour Peyvandi, A radiation-based hydrocarbon two-phase flow meter for estimating of phase fraction independent of liquid phase density in stratified regime. Flow Meas. Instrum. 46, 25–32 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Hanus, L. Petryka, M. Zych, Velocity measurement of the liquid–solid flow in a vertical pipeline using gamma-ray absorption and weighted cross-correlation. Flow Meas. Instrum. 40, 58–63 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. Mosorov, M. Zych, R. Hanus, L. Petryka, Modelling of dynamic experiments in MCNP5 environment. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 112, 136–140 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Hanus, M. Zych, L. Petryka, D. Swisulski, Time delay estimation in two-phase flow investigation using the \(\gamma \)-ray attenuation technique. Math. Probl. Eng. (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/475735 (Article ID 475735) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Zych, L. Petryka, J. Kępinński, R. Hanus, T. Bujak, E. Puskarczyk, Radioisotope investigations of compound two-phase flows in an open channel. Flow Meas. Instrum. 35, 11–15 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Hanus, Application of the Hilbert transform to measurements of liquid–gas flow using gamma ray densitometry. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 72, 210–217 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.H. Jung, J.S. Kim, J.B. Kim, T.Y. Kwon, Flow-rate measurements of a dual-phase pipe flow by cross-correlation technique of transmitted radiation signals. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 67, 1254–1258 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.H. Roshani, E. Nazemi, M.M. Roshani, Identification of flow regime and estimation of volume fraction independent of liquid phase density in gas–liquid two-phase flow. Prog. Nucl. Energy 98, 29–37 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G.H. Roshani, S.A.H. Feghhi, A. Mahmoudi-Aznaveh, E. Nazemi, A. Adineh-Vand, Precise volume fraction prediction in oil–water–gas multiphase flows by means of gamma-ray attenuation and artificial neural networks using one detector. Measurement 51, 34–41 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G.H. Roshani, E. Nazemi, S.A.H. Feghhi, Investigation of using 60Co source and one detector for determining the flow regime and void fraction in gas–liquid two-phase flows. Flow Meas. Instrum. 50, 73–79 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. El Abd, Intercomparison of gamma ray scattering and transmission techniques for gas volume fraction measurements in two phase pipe flow. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 735, 260–266 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Nazemi, G.H. Roshani, S.A.H. Feghhi, R.G. Peyvandi, S. Setayeshi, Precise void fraction measurement in two-phase flows independent of the flow regime using gamma-ray attenuation. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 48, 64–71 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Yadollahi, E. Nazemi, A. Zolfaghari, A.M. Ajorloo, Application of artificial neural network for predicting the optimal mixture of radiation shielding concrete. Prog. Nucl. Energy 89, 69–77 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    G.H. Roshani, S.A.H. Feghhi, F. Shama, A. Salehizadeh, E. Nazemi, Prediction of materials density according to number of scattered gamma photons using optimum artificial neural network. Comput. Methods Phys. 2014, 305345 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Yadollahi, E. Nazemi, A. Zolfaghari, A.M. Ajorloo, Optimization of thermal neutron shield concrete mixture using artificial neural network. Nucl. Eng. Design 305, 146–155 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu. Zhao, Qincheng Bi, Richa Hu, Recognition and measurement in the flow pattern and void fraction of gas liquid two-phase flow in vertical upward pipe using the gamma densitometer. Appl. Therm. Eng. 60(12), 398–410 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y. Zhao, Q. Bi, Y. Yuan, H. Lv, Void fraction measurement in steam-water two phase flow using the gamma ray attenuation under high pressure and high temperature evaporating conditions. Flow Meas. Instrum. 49, 18–30 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    G.H. Roshani, E. Nazemi, M.M. Roshani, Intelligent recognition of gas–oil–water three-phase flow regime and determination of volume fraction using Radial Basis Function. Flow Meas. Instrum. 54, 39–45 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    G.H. Roshani, R. Hanus, A. Khazaei, M. Zych, E. Nazemi, V. Mosorov, Density and velocity determination for singlephase flow based on radiotracer technique and neural networks. Flow Meas. Instrum. 61, 9–14 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Karami, G.H. Roshani, A. Salehizadeh, E. Nazemi, The fuzzy logic application in volume fractions prediction of the annular three-phase flows. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 36, 35 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    G.H. Roshani, E. Nazemi, M.M. Roshani, A novel method for flow pattern identification in unstable operational conditions using gamma ray and radial basis function. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 123, 60–68 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    G.H. Roshani, A. Karami, A. Salehizadeh, E. Nazemi, The capability of radial basis function to forecast the volume fractions of the annular three-phase flow of gas–oil–water. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 129, 156–162 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    J.F. Briesmeister, MCNP—a General Monte Carlo N-particle Transport Code, Version 4C. Report LA-13709-M (Los Alamos National Laboratory, April 2000)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    T. Takagi, M. Sugeno, Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. 15, 116 (1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J.S.R. Jang, C.T. Sun, E. Mizutani, Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing, vol. 19 (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1997), pp. 510–514Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    J.S.R. Jang, C.T. Sun, Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control. Proc. IEEE 83, 378–406 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    The MathWorks, Fuzzy Logic Toolbox User’s Guide, Inc., vol. 3 (Apple Hill Drive, Natick, 1995–2007), pp. 01760–02098Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. Amiri, A. Karami, T. Yousefi, M. Zanjani, Artificial neural network to predict the natural convection from vertical and inclined arrays of horizontal cylinders. Polish J. Chem. Technol. 14, 46–52 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. Karami, E. Rezaei, M. Shahhosseni, M. Aghakhani, Fuzzy logic to predict the heat transfer in an air cooler equipped with different tube inserts. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 53, 141–147 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    T. Yousefi, A. Karami, E. Rezaei, S. Ebrahimi, Fuzzy modeling of the forced convection heat transfer from a V-shaped plate exposed to an air impingement slot jet. Heat Transf. Asian Res. 41, 5 (2012)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    A. Karami, T. Yousefi, E. Rezaei, A. Amiri, Modeling of the free convection heat transfer from an isothermal horizontal cylinder in a vertical channel via the fuzzy logic. Int. J. Multiphys. 6, 7–16 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Aghakhani, M.M. Jalilian, A. Karami, Prediction of weld bead dilution in GMAW process using fuzzy logic. Appl. Mech. Mater. 110—-116, 3171–3175 (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    M. Aghakhani, M.R. Ghaderi, A. Karami, A.A. Derakhshan, Combined effect of TiO\(_{2}\) nanoparticles and input welding parameters on the weld bead penetration in submerged arc welding process using fuzzy logic. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 70, 63–72 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    E. Rezaei, A. Karami, T. Yousefi, S. Mahmoudinezhad, Modeling the free convection heat transfer in a partitioned cavity using ANFIS. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 39, 470–475 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    A. Karami, E. Akbari, E. Rezaei, M. Ashjaee, Neuro-fuzzy modeling of the free convection from vertical arrays of isothermal cylinders. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 27, 588–592 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    A. Karami, E. Rezaei, M. Rahimi, S. Khani, Modeling of heat transfer in an air cooler equipped with classic twisted tape inserts using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Chem. Eng. Commun. 200, 532–542 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    A. Karami, T. Yousefi, S. Mohebbi, C. Aghanajafi, Prediction of free convection from vertical and inclined rows of horizontal isothermal cylinders using ANFIS. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39, 4201 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. Karami, T. Yousefi, I. Harsini, E. Maleki, S. Mahmoudinezhad, Neuro-fuzzy modeling of the free convection heat transfer from a wavy surface. Heat Transf. Eng. 36, 847–855 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    A. Karami, T. Yousefi, S. Ebrahimi, E. Rezaei, S. Mahmoudinezhad, Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) to predict the forced convection heat transfer from a v-shaped plate. Heat Mass Transf. 49, 789–798 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Nuclear Electronics and Nuclear Detection Society and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical Engineering DepartmentKermanshah University of TechnologyKermanshahIran
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentRazi UniversityKermanshahIran
  3. 3.Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations