The Impacts of Face-to-Face and Cyber Incivility on Performance, Helping Behavior, Counterproductive Behaviors, and Physiological Activity
- 21 Downloads
The present experiment compared the immediate impacts of cyber incivility and face-to-face incivility vs. neutral interactions on both behavioral [task performance, creativity, flexibility, helping behavior, and counterproductive behaviors (CBs)] and physiological outcomes [heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and skin conductance (SCR)]. We randomly assigned 232 undergraduate students to one of four conditions: (1) face-to-face uncivil, (2) cyber uncivil, (3) face-to-face neutral, or (4) cyber neutral. In the uncivil conditions, two uncivil interactions were delivered with instructions to complete anagrams and list uses for a brick. Physiological responses were measured while participants completed the tasks. Additionally, participants were given the opportunity to help the experimenter by picking up pens that were “accidentally” dropped. Thefts of extra candy, pens, and gift cards served as measures of CBs. After uncivil interactions, participants engaged in significantly more CBs and experienced greater HR increases as compared to neutral interactions. Additionally, participants were most likely to steal pens in the face-to-face uncivil condition. However, HR increased more in cyber conditions than face-to-face conditions. Instances of incivility did not impact task performance, creativity, flexibility, or helping behavior. These findings suggest that although face-to-face incivility led to increased CBs, cyber incivility may have a stronger impact on physiological responses.
KeywordsIncivility Cyber incivility Face-to-face incivility Counterproductive behaviors Heart rate Skin conductance
The authors wish to thank Sydney Batchelder, Breanna Fortin, Meaghan Rodgers, Rachel Scrivano, Ashlee Tangarone, Taylor Page, Samantha Dyar, Elizabeth Bartilucci, Alexandra Wilson, Sarah Caruso, Priscilla Rigos, and Jacob Ward for their assistance with data collection, and Calli Oleksy and Katy Minet for their assistance with physiological data processing.
Funding for this study was awarded to the first author through a Connecticut State Universities – American Association of University Professors (CSU-AAUP) grant and the second author through a Quinnipiac University College of Arts and Sciences Grant-in-Aid.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
- Cho, M., Bonn, M. A., Han, S. J., & Lee, K. H. (2016). Workplace incivility and its effect upon restaurant frontline service employee emotions and service performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(12), 2888–2912. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2015-0205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Clercq, D., Haq, I. U., Azeem, M. U., & Ahmad, H. N. (2019). The relationship between workplace incivility and helping behavior: Roles of job dissatisfaction and political skill. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1567453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Giumetti, G. W., Hatfield, A. L., Scisco, J. L., Schroeder, A. N., Muth, E. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (2013). What a rude e-mail! Examining the differential effects of incivility versus support on mood, energy, engagement, and performance in an online context. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032851.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han, Y., Kim, Y., & Hur, W.-M. (2019). The effects of perceived supervisor incivility on child-care workers’ job performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and intrinsic motivation. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0133-7.
- Jackson, S. L. (2017). Statistics plain and simple. Boston: Cengage.Google Scholar
- Mackey, J. D., Bishoff, J. D., Daniels, S. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2017). Incivility’s relationship with workplace outcomes: Enactment as a boundary condition in two samples. Journal of Business Ethics. Google Scholar
- Porath, C. L., & Erez, A. (2007). Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1181–1197.Google Scholar
- Robinson, S. L., Wang, W., & Kiewitz, C. (2014). Coworkers behaving badly: The impact of coworker deviant behavior upon individual employees. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salomon, K., & Jagusztyn, N. E. (2008). Resting cardiovascular levels and reactivity to interpersonal incivility among black, Latina/o, and white individuals: The moderating role of ethnic discrimination. Health Psychology, 27(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6126.96.36.1993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scisco, J. L. (2019). Cyberbullying in the workplace: A review of the research. In G. W. Giumetti & R. M. Kowalski (Eds.), Cyberbullying in schools, workplaces, and romantic relationships: The many lenses and perspectives of electronic mistreatment (pp. 81–97). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). A model of counterproductive work behavior. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive workplace behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar