Advertisement

GZ - Psychologie

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 16–21 | Cite as

Tussen stoornisgerichte zorg en risicogericht ingrijpen

Diagnostiek in de ambulante forensische psychiatrie
  • Niels BoswinkelEmail author
  • Wouter Den Bode
psychodiagnostiek

Samenvatting

Belangrijkste missie van de forensische psychiatrie is zorgen voor veiligheid. Maar ook hier geldt: geen gerichte zorg zonder goede indicatiestelling. Gz-psychologen Niels Boswinkel en Wouter den Bode, teamleiders bij forensische polikliniek de Waag, schreven een introductie over diagnostiek binnen een (ambulante) forensische setting.

Referenties

  1. 1.
    Cuevas, C., Wolff, K.T. & Baglivio, M.T. (2017) Self-efficacy, aspirations, and residential placement outcomes: Why belief in a prosocial self matters, Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 1-11.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woldgabreal, Y., Day, A. & Ward, ST. (2016) Linking positive psychology to offender supervision outcomes: the mediating role of psychological flexibility, general self-efficacy, optimism and hope, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43 (6), 697-721.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andrews, D. A. & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis/Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zie voor een overzicht: Brown, J. & Singh, J.P. (2014) Forensic Risk Assessment: A Beginner’s Guide, Archives of Forensic Psychology, 2014 (1), 49-59.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Falzer, P.R. (2013) Valuing Structured Professional Judgment: Predictive Validity, Decision-making, and the Clinical-Actuarial Conflict, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 31, 40-54.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Serin, R.C., Chadwick, N. & Lloyd, C.D. (2016) Dynamic risk and protective factors, Psychology, Crime & Law, 22 (1-2), 151-170.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ward, T. & Fortune, C-A. (2016) The role of dynamic risk factors in the explanation of offending, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 29, 79-88.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vogel, V. de & Ruiter, C. de (2006) Structured professional judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: A prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20, Psychology, Crime & Law, 12 (3), 321-336.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Horn, J.E., Eisenberg, M. & Uzieblo, K. (2016) Risicotaxatie in de Nederlandse ambulante forensische geestelijke gezondheidszorg, Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 58 (8), 583-592.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Vries Robbé, M., De Vogel, V. & De Spa, E. (2011) Protective Factors for Violence Risk in Forensic Psychiatric Patients: A Retrospective Validation Study of the SAPROF, International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10 (3), 178-186.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bouman, Y.,H.A., De Ruiter, C. & Schene, A.H. (2010) Changes in quality of life in forensic psychiatric outpatients after 6 months of community-based treatment, Personality and Mental Health, 4, 257-270.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Horn (2018) The Forensic Symptoms Inventory – Revised (FSI-R Adults): measurement and structural invariance across gender and age groups, Psychological Reports, 121 (3), 566-594.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    13.Ackerman, S. J., Hilsenroth, M. J., Baity, M. R. & Blagys, M. D. (2000). Interaction of therapeutic process and alliance during psychological assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 82-109.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum is een imprint van Springer Media B.V., onderdeel van Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations