Quantum Mechanical Pragmatic Rules and Social Science

  • E. HavenEmail author


This paper discusses if we may find quantum pragmatic rules in social science.


Maximization problem Quantum probability Complementarity 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.


  1. Bender, C. M., & Boettcher, S. (1998). Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry. Physical Review Letters, 80, 5243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Barros, A., & Suppes, P. (2009). Quantum mechanics, interference and the brain. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frieden, B. R., Hawkins, R. J., & d’Anna, J. L. (2007). Financial economics from fisher information. In B. R. Frieden & R. A. Gatenby (Eds.), Exploratory data analysis using Fisher information (pp. 42–73). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Haven, E., & Khrennikov, A. (2013). Quantum Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Chapter 14).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haven, E., & Khrennikov, A. (2017). The Palgrave handbook of quantum models in social science: Applications and grand challenges. London: Palgrave MacMillan, Springer Nature.Google Scholar
  6. Khrennikov, A. (2010). On the physical basis of the theory of ‘mental waves’. Neuroquantology, 8(4, Supplement 1), S71–S80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Khrennikova, P. (2016). Application of quantum master equation for long-term prognosis of asset-prices. Physica A, 450, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Meier, C. A. (2001). Atom and archetype: The Pauli/Jung letters, 1932–1958. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Plotnitsky, A., & Khrennikov, A. (2015). Reality without realism: On the ontological and epistemological architecture of quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 25(10), 1269–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Neuroscientia 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Memorial UniversitySt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations