No Effect of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation to Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Naturalistic Prospective Memory in Healthy Young and Older Adults
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, has been shown to enhance working memory and multitasking abilities. Because of the substantial overlap in both cognitive processes (maintenance, monitoring) and neural substrates (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, DLPFC) that support both working memory and prospective memory – the ability to remember to perform intended actions at appropriate moments in the future (taking medications, turning off appliances) – we tested whether tDCS would also enhance young and older adults’ prospective memory. If tDCS enhances DLPFC activation, then it should benefit prospective memory performance, particularly for tasks that rely on controlled monitoring processes for prospective memory cue detection. Healthy young and older adults played the Virtual Week game while they received either a session of active tDCS to DLPFC and then, after at least 48 h, a session of placebo-controlled, sham stimulation, or vice versa. The Virtual Week game is a reliable measure of naturalistic prospective memory that includes assessments of five different types of prospective memory tasks that vary in cue-type (time vs. event) and task-regularity and, thus, the extent to which task performance should rely on controlled monitoring processes and DLPFC activation. Active tDCS had no effect on prospective memory performance relative to sham tDCS for either age group or any task type. In contrast, there were reliable practice effects across test sessions regardless of whether active tDCS was applied during the first or second session. A single session of tDCS to DLPFC did not enhance young or older adults’ prospective memory performance, but practice did.
KeywordsTranscranial direct current stimulation tDCS Noninvasive brain stimulation Prospective memory Aging Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex DLPFC
The study was funded by the Cognition & Emotion Research Centre of ACU-Melbourne. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
HT designed the study with PGR; HT collected the young adult data; NSR collected the older adult data with the help of RV and JS; NSR and HT analyzed the data; NSR and HT wrote the manuscript, with helpful edits from MK.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Research Disclosure Statements
One older adult did not return for the second session and was thus excluded from final analysis. All independent and dependent variables, whether successful or failed, have been reported in the Method section.
- Bennabi, D., Pedron, S., Haffen, E., Monnin, J., Peterschmitt, Y., & Van Waes, V. (2014). Transcranial direct current stimulation for memory enhancement: From clinical research to animal models. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8.Google Scholar
- Brandt, J., Spencer, M., & Folstein, M. (1988). The telephone interview for cognitive status. Neuropsychology, Neuropsychiatry, and Behavioral Neurology, 1(2), 111–117.Google Scholar
- Ellis, D. M., Veloria, G. K. G., Arnett, C. R., Vogel, A. E., Pitães, M., & Brewer, G. A. (under review). No evidence for enhancing prospective memory with anodal Transcranial direct current stimulation across dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement.Google Scholar
- Hering, A., Kliegel, M., Rendell, P. G., Craik, F. I. M., & Rose, N. S. (2018). Prospective memory is a key predictor of functional Independence in older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. Google Scholar
- Minarik, T., Berger, B., Althaus, L., Bader, V., Biebl, B., Brotzeller, F., et al. (2016). The importance of sample size for reproducibility of tDCS effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.Google Scholar
- Phillips, L. H., Henry, J. D., & Martin, M. (2008). Adult aging and prospective memory: The importance of ecological validity.Google Scholar
- Rendell, P. G., & Craik, F. I. (2000). Virtual week and actual week: Age-related differences in prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(7).Google Scholar
- Rose, N. S., Rendell, P. G., Hering, A., Kliegel, M., Bidelman, G. M., & Craik, F. I. (2015b). Cognitive and neural plasticity in older adults’ prospective memory following training with the virtual week computer game. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9.Google Scholar