Advertisement

Journal of Cognitive Enhancement

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 359–364 | Cite as

Age-Related Differences in Visual Perception Between People Aged from 7 to 83: an Eye-Tracking Study

  • Władysław Błasiak
  • Katarzyna Kazubowska
  • Paweł KazubowskiEmail author
Original Research
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Our eye-tracking research presents the time of solving and the chosen oculometric parameters for two different visual perception tests on a sample of 44 people aged from 7 to 83. The findings have shown biometric stability of subject’s eyes with respect to the fixation times and saccade velocities. The main purpose of this study was to examine the speed of performing two different visual perception tests in people of various ages. In this study, an eye tracker (The Eye Tribe) captured several parameters during two different visual perception tests conducted with 44 people aged from 7 to 83 years. We determined a relationship between the time of solving the perception tests and the age of the persons being tested. For participants aged 7 to 20 years and over 50 years, lower frequencies of eye fixation and lower values of mouse average trajectory length were found. People of this age declared significantly less stress during the first test. Pearson correlation coefficient between the mean of the duration of the fixation times and the average speed of the saccades for all tested individuals in both tests were high (r ˃ 0.7). Based on our results, it was suggested that it is highly probable that a person with relatively high mean of the duration of the fixation times or average saccade velocities recorded for one test will also have high values of these parameters during another tests. No significant correlations were found between oculometric parameters and parameters related to computer mouse movement. This study suggests that eye-tracking method could be very useful for investigating age-related differences in visual perception. The results could lead to further improvement of a wide range of visual materials destined for people of different ages.

Keywords

Age-related differences Visual perception tests Eye-tracking Oculometric parameters 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Billino, J., Bremmer, F., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2008). Differential aging of motion processing mechanisms: evidence against general perceptual decline. Vision Research, 48, 1254–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blasiak, W. (2016). Neuro-science and eyetracking. Investigations and Applications. Cracow: Libron-Filip Lohner.Google Scholar
  3. Blasiak, W., Godlewska, M., Wcisło, D., & Rosiek, R. (2012). Spectrum of physics comprehension. European Journal of Physics, 33, 565–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carstensen, L. L., Mikels, J. A., & Mara, M. (2006). Aging and the intersection of cognition, motivation and emotion. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, 6, 343–362.Google Scholar
  5. Charness, N. (2008). Aging and human performance. Human Factors, 50, 548–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Creasey, H., & Rapoport, S. I. (1985). The aging human brain. Annals of Neurology, 17, 2–1O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, E. T., Greg, D., Fujawa, G., & Shikano, T. (2002). Perceptual processing and search efficiency of young and older adults in a simple-feature search task: a staircase approach. The Journal of Gerontology, 57, 324–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye-tracking methodology: theory and practice. England, London: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Hertel, G., Thielgen, M., Rauschenbach, C., Grube, A., Stamov-Rosnagel, C., & Krumm, S. (2013). Age-differences in motivation and stress at work, age differences in motivation and stress at work. In C. M. Schlick, E. Frieling, & J. Wegge (Eds.), Age-differentiated work systems (Vol. 1, pp. 119–149). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer. Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kazubowski, P. (2016). The eyetracking research of oculometric parameters in the process of solving physics problems. Cracow: Polish Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  11. Kirsch P, Lis S, Esslinger C, Gruppe H, Danos P, Broll J, et al. Brain activation during mental maze solving. Neuropsychobiology 2006; 51: 54–58.Google Scholar
  12. Kliegl, R, Nuthmann A & Engbert R. Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 206; 135: 12–35.Google Scholar
  13. Lai, M. L., Tsai, M. J., Yang, F. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Liu, T. C., Lee, S. W., et al. (2013). A review using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laubrock, J., Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2006). SWIFT explorations of age differences in eye movements during reading. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 872–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leigh, R. J., & Zee, D. S. (1999). The neurology of eye movements (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: FA Davis.Google Scholar
  16. Levine, B. K., Beason-Held, L. L., Purpura, K. P., Aronchick, D. M., Optican, L. M., Alexander, G. E., et al. (2000). Age-related differences in visual perception: A PET study. Neurobiology of Aging, 21, 577–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lich, M., & Bremmer, F. (2014). Self-motion perception in the elderly. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linville, D. G., & Armeric, S. P. (1991). Cortical cerebral blood flow governed by the basal forebrain: age-related impairments. Neurobiology of Aging, 12, 503–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lureiro-Martinez, D., Trujillo, C. A., & Unda, J. (2017). Time perspective and age: a review of age associated differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1–8.Google Scholar
  20. Morgan MW. “Normal age related vision changes,” in Vision and Aging, eds Rosenbloom AA., Morgan M., editors. 2nd Edn. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann 1993; 2: 178–199.Google Scholar
  21. Mueller, S. C., Jacson, C. P. T., & Skelton, R. W. (2008). Sex differences in a virtual water maze: an eye tracking and pupillometry study. Behavioural Brain Research, 193, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ott, B. R., Heindel, W. C., Whelihan, W. M., Caron, M. D., Piatt, A. L., & DiCarlo, M. A. (2003). Maze test performance and reported driving ability in early dementia. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology. Thousand Oaks, 16, 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., & Yang, J. (2009). Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 24, 755–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodgers, M. K., Sindone, J. A., & Moffat, D. A. (2012). Effects of age on navigation strategy. Neurobiology of Aging, 33, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Salverda, A. P., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). A goal-based perspective on eye movements in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137, 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Souza, D. E., Franca, F. R., & Campos, T. F. (2006). Maze test: instrument for analyzing the acquisition of motor skills. Brazilan Journal of Physical Therapy, 10, 354–359.Google Scholar
  28. Souza, A. E., De Oliveira, D. C., & Campos, T. F. (2013). Maze test: an instrument to evaluate age-related cognitive and motor changes in humans. RBCEH Brazilian Journal of the Sciences of Human Aging, 10, 19–29.Google Scholar
  29. Spear, P. D. (1993). Neural bases of visual deficits during aging. Vision Research, 33, 2589–2609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spooner, J. W., Sakala, S. M., & Baloh, R. W. (1980). Effect of aging on eye tracking. Arch NeuroI, 37, 575–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Voskuhler, A., Nordmeier, V., Kuchinke, L., & Jakobs, A. (2008). OGAMA (Open gaze and mouse analyzer): open-source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1150–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Warabi, T., Kase, M., & Kato, T. (1984). Effect of aging on the accuracy of visually guided saccadic eye movement. Annals of Neurology, 16, 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wyburn, G. M., Pickford, R. W., & Hirst, R. J. (1964). Human senses and perception (1st ed.. English). University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pawel Wlodkowic UniversityPlockPoland
  2. 2.Center of Optics, Optometry and Visual RehabilitationPilaPoland

Personalised recommendations