Advertisement

Embodied Perspectives on Behavioral Cognitive Enhancement

  • C. I. Zona
  • M. Raab
  • Martin H. FischerEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Recent debates about strategies to enhance human cognition concerned mostly pharmacological, environmental, and genetic factors, as well as computerized cognitive training paradigms targeting healthy populations. We offer a new perspective on behavioral cognitive enhancement, arguing that embodied cognition represents a productive framework to explain results and to inform new studies aimed at enhancing cognition. Understanding cognitive mechanisms and their time course through an embodied perspective contributes to our knowledge of brain functioning and its potential. We review two domains: (a) physical exercise and (b) embodied learning. For each domain, we summarize experimental evidence according to the level of embodiment of the knowledge representations targeted by interventions (i.e., situatedness, embodiment proper, grounding). Future research should integrate embodiment and cognitive enhancement in training paradigms focused on joint cognitive and physical tasks.

Keywords

Cognitive enhancement Cognitive training Embodied cognition Embodied learning Physical exercise 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Bernhard Hommel for the helpful comments on an earlier version of this text.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This review reports no new data and is in compliance with ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alban, M. W., & Kelley, C. M. (2013). Research report: embodiment meets metamemory: weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1628–1634.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032420.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhalla, M., Proffitt, D. R., Bertamini, M., Bertenthal, B., Bunker, L., Creem, S., Gaesser, G., Kubovy, M., & Yang, T. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1076–1096.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, N., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). Moving to learn: how guiding the hands can set the stage for learning. Cognitive Science, 40(7), 1831–1849.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardona, J. F. (2017). Embodied cognition: a challenging road for clinical neuropsychology. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 388.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00388.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson, R. A., Avraamides, M. N., Cary, M., & Strasberg, S. (2007). What do the hands externalize in simple arithmetic? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 747–756.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Casasanto, D. (2011). Different bodies, different minds: the body specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 378–383.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan, A. S., Han, Y. M. Y., Sze, S. L., & Lau, E. M. (2015). Neuroenhancement of memory for children with autism by a mind-body exercise. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(DEC), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen, J. F., Gaigg, S. B., & Calvo-Merino, B. (2018). I can feel my heartbeat: dancers have increased interoceptive accuracy. Psychophysiology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press ISBN: 9780190217013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coello, Y., & Fischer, M. H. (2016). Foundations of embodied cognition—volume 1. Perceptual and emotional embodiment. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen Kadosh, R. (Ed.). (2014). The stimulated brain: cognitive enhancement using non-invasive brain stimulation. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Colzato, L. S. (2017). Theory-driven approaches to cognitive enhancement.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57505-6 Google Scholar
  15. Congdon, E. L., Novack, M. A., Brooks, N., Hemani-Lopez, N., O’Keefe, L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2017). Better together: simultaneous presentation of speech and gesture in math instruction supports generalization and retention. Learning and Instruction, 50, 65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.03.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106(2), 1047–1058.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cremen, I. A., & Carson, R. G. (2017). Have standard tests of cognitive function been misappropriated in the study of cognitive enhancement? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(May), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daamen, M., & Raab, M. (2012). Psychological assessment in physical exercise. In H. Boecker, C. H. Hillmann, L. Scheef, & H. K. Strüder (Eds.), Functional neuroimaging in exercise and sport sciences (pp. 109–153). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media LLC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davidsen, J., & Ryberg, T. (2017). “This is the size of one meter”: children’s bodily-material collaboration. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(1), 65–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9248-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Di Nota, P. M., Chartrand, J. M., Levkov, G. R., Montefusco-Siegmund, R., & DeSouza, J. F. X. (2017). Experience-dependent modulation of alpha and beta during action observation and motor imagery. BMC Neuroscience, 18(1), 28.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-017-0349-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Dietz, P. (2013). The influence of sports on cognitive task performance—a critical overview. In E. Hildt & A. G. Franke (Eds.), Cognitive enhancement: an interdisciplinary perspective, Trends in augmentation of human performance (Vol. 1).  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417042-1.00010-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drid, P., Majstorović, N., & Drapšin, M. (2010). The effects of different excercise workloads on visual perception skills in elite Serbian female judokas. Kinesiology, 42, 201–207.Google Scholar
  23. Dubljević, V., Venero, C., & Knafo, S. (2015). What is cognitive enhancement? In Cognitive enhancement: pharmacologic, environmental and genetic factors (pp. 1–9). North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2009). Toward a science of exceptional achievement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1172, 199–217.  https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1393.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2015). Embodied L2 construction learning. Language Learning, 65(2), 268–297.  https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischer, M. H. (2012). A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied and situated numerical cognition. Cognitive Processing, 13, S161–S164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0477-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: spatial-numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(OCT), 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fischer, M. H., & Coello, Y. (2016). Foundations of embodied cognition—volume 2: conceptual and interactive embodiment. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  30. Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2014). Spatial associations in numerical cognition: from single digits to arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1461–1483.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.927515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2018). Number concepts—abstract and embodied. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 373(1752), 20170125.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(March), 825–850.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701623605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gentili, R., Papaxanthis, C., & Pozzo, T. (2006). Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice. Neuroscience, 137(3), 761–772.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gentsch, A., Weber, A., Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2016). Towards a common framework of grounded action cognition. Relating motor control, perception and cognition. Cognition, 146, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2011). Special issue: Viewpoint action-based language: a theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48(7), 905–922.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gómez-Pinilla. (2008). Brain foods: the effects of nutrients on brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(7), 568–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gregorcic, B., Planinsic, G., & Etkina, E. (2017). Doing science by waving hands: talk, symbiotic gesture, and interaction with digital content as resources in student inquiry. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guillot, A., Lebon, F., Rouffet, D., Champely, S., Doyon, J., & Collet, C. (2007). Muscular responses during motor imagery as a function of muscle contraction types. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 66, 18–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.05.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hainselin, M., Picard, L., Manolli, P., Vankerkore-Candas, S., & Bourdin, B. (2017). Hey teacher, don’t leave them kids alone: action is better for memory than reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(MAR), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hald, L. A., de Nooijer, J., van Gog, T., & Bekkering, H. (2016). Optimizing word learning via links to perceptual and motoric experience. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 495–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9334-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hillman, C. H., Erickson, K. I., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Be smart, exercise your heart: Exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(1), 58–65.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Jacobson, J., & Matthaeus, L. (2014). Athletics and executive functioning: how athletic participation and sport type correlate with cognitive performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 521–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(19), 6829–6833.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801268105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Jaroslawska, A. J., Gathercole, S. E., Allen, R. J., & Holmes, J. (2016). Following instructions from working memory: why does action at encoding and recall help? Memory & Cognition, 44, 1183–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition: what actions tell the self. Oxford: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johnson, J. G., & Raab, M. (2003). Take the first: option-generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 215–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00027-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D. A., & Savio-Ramos, C. (2016). Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: centripetal force. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(NOV), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1169–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kalicinski, M., & Lobinger, B. (2013). Benefits of motor and exercise imagery for older adults. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 8(1), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jirspa-2012-0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 317–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kontra, C., Lyons, D. J., Fischer, S. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Physical experience enhances science learning. Psychological Science, 26(6), 737–749.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615569355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kouchaki, M., Gino, F., & Jami, A. (2014). The burden of guilt: heavy backpacks, light snacks, and enhanced morality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 414–424.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lachman, R., Lachman, J. L., & Butterfield, E. C. (1979). Cognitive psychology and information processing. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leder, H., Bär, S., & Topolinski, S. (2012). Covert painting simulations influence aesthetic appreciation of artworks. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1479–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lillard, A. S. (2005). Montessori: the science behind the genius. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Loeffler, J., Raab, M., & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2016). A lifespan perspective on embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 845.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00845.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. McMorris, T. (2016). Exercise-cognition interaction: neuroscience perspectives (1st ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  60. Michalak, J., Burg, J., & Heidenreich, T. (2012). Don’t forget your body: mindfulness, embodiment, and the treatment of depression. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21, 519–524.Google Scholar
  61. Michalak, J., Troje, N. F., & Heidenreich, T. (2010). Embodied effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 68(3), 312–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organisation of individual differences in executive functions: four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Moreau, D. (2015). Brains and brawn: complex motor activities to maximize cognitive enhancement. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 475–482.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9323-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moreau, D., Kirk, I. J., & Waldie, K. E. (2016). Seven pervasive statistical flaws in cognitive training interventions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(April), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moreau, D., Morrison, A. B., & Conway, A. R. A. (2015). An ecological approach to cognitive enhancement: complex motor training. Acta Psychologica, 157, 44–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Munzert, J., Lorey, B., & Zentgraf, K. (2009). Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Research Reviews, 60, 306–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 44–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90004-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. North, J. (2012). An overview and critique of the “10,000 hours rule” and “theory of deliberate practice”. Project Report. Leeds Metropolitan University. http://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/78/.
  69. Nyberg, L., Sandblom, J., Jones, S., Neely, A. S., Petersson, K. M., Ingvar, M., & Backman, L. (2003). Neural correlates of training-related memory improvement in adulthood and aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(23), 13728–13733  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1735487100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Öttl, B., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2017). Forming associations between language and sensorimotor traces during novel word learning. Language and Cognition, 9(1), 156–171.  https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pesce, C., & Ben-Soussan, T. D. (2016). “Cogito ergo sum” or “ambulo ergo sum”? New perspectives in developmental exercise and cognition research. In T. McMorris (Ed.), Exercise-cognition interaction (pp. 251–282). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. H., McRae, K., & Spivey, M. J. (2011). The mechanics of embodiment: a dialog on embodiment and computational modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(JAN), 1–21  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005.Google Scholar
  73. Potkin, K., Bunney, W., & García, A. (2012). Sleep improves memory: the effect of sleep on long term memory in early adolescence. PLoS One, 7(8), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(9), 458–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Raab, M. (2017). Motor heuristics and embodied choices: how to choose and act. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 34–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Raab, M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2015). The power of simplicity: a fast-and-frugal heuristics approach to performance science. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(OCT), 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Raab, M., & Laborde, S. (2011). When to blink and when to think: preference for intuitive decisions results in faster and better tactical choices. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(1), 89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599725.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013). About sleep’s role in memory. Physiological Reviews, 93(2), 681–766.  https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00032.2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169–192.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Schaeffner, S., Koch, I., & Phillipp, A. M. (2018). The role of learning in sensory-motor modality switching. Psychological Research, 82, 955–969.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0872-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(8), 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2016). Is moving more memorable than proving? Effects of embodiment and imagined enactment on verb memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1010.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2017). Bodily effort enhances learning and metacognition: investigating the relation between physical effort and cognition using dual-process models of embodiment. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 13(1), 3–10.  https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0202-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Slepian, M. L., Masicampo, E. J., Toosi, N. R., & Ambady, N. (2012). The physical burdens of secrecy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 619–624.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Söderqvist, S., & Nutley, S. B. (2017). Are measures of transfer effects missing the target? Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0048-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Topolinski, S. (2010). Moving the eye of the beholder: motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1220–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2015). Routes to embodiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00940/full.
  89. Trevisan, P., Sedeño, L., Birba, A., Ibáñez, A., & García, A. M. (2017). A moving story: Whole-body motor training selectively improves the appraisal of action meanings in naturalistic narratives. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 12538.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12928-w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. van Dam, W. O., Rueschemeyer, S. A., Bekkering, H., & Lindemann, O. (2013). Embodied grounding of memory: toward the effects of motor execution on memory consolidation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(12), 2310–2328.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.777084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Verburgh, L., Scherder, E. J. A., van Lange, P. A., & Oosterlaan, J. (2014). Executive functioning in highly talented soccer players. PLoS ONE 9(3): e91254.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vestberg, T., Gustafson, R., Maurex, L., Ingvar, M., & Petrovic, P. (2012) Executive functions predict the success of top-soccer players. PLoS ONE 7(4): e34731.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Weisberg, S. M., & Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Embodied cognition and STEM learning: overview of a topical collection. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2, 38.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0071-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Werner, K., & Raab, M. (2013). Moving to solution. Experimental Psychology, 60, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Woods, A. J., Philbeck, J. W., & Danoff, J. V. (2009). The various perceptions of distance: an alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1104–1117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Wriessnegger, S., Steyrl, D., Koschutnig, K., & Müller-Putz, G. (2014). Short time sports exercise boosts motor imagery patterns: implications of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(469), 1–9.Google Scholar
  97. Xie, L., Kang, H., Xu, Q., Chen, M. J., Liao, Y., Thiyagarajan, M., et al. (2013). Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science, 342(6156), 373–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PotsdamPotsdam OT GolmGermany
  2. 2.German Sport University CologneKölnGermany
  3. 3.London South Bank UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations