Advertisement

Journal of Cognitive Enhancement

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 281–292 | Cite as

Spatial Contextual Cueing, Assessed in a Computerized Task, Is Not a Limiting Factor for Expert Performance in the Domain of Team Sports or Action Video Game Playing

  • Anne SchmidtEmail author
  • Franziska Geringswald
  • Stefan Pollmann
Original Research

Abstract

In two reaction time experiments, we investigated if handball and action video game players show improved implicit learning of repeated spatial configurations for efficient search guidance in comparison to a control group without sport or video game proficiency. To this end, we used both a sport-specific pseudo 3-D contextual cueing task and the original contextual cueing paradigm (Chun and Jiang 36, 28-71, 1998). In this visual search paradigm, a target element has to be searched in a distractor-filled display. A typical block of trials consisted of one half of displays that were repeatedly presented in subsequent blocks, while the other half of displays was always randomly generated. In numerous studies with this paradigm, it has been found that search becomes more efficient in repeated displays, even though participants are often unaware of these repetitions (Chun 4, 170-178, 2000). Contextual cueing was present in all groups. Thus, all groups showed incidental learning of repeated displays. Contrary to our hypothesis, handball and action video game players did not differ in the strength of contextual cueing from the control group, although these groups had overall faster search times in the sport-specific displays of experiment 1. To conclude, our data yield no evidence for superior context-learning skills in athletes or action video game players.

Keywords

Attention Contextual cueing Expertise Team sports Action video game playing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Florian Baumgartner and Daniel Kottke by helpful statistical advice and discussions.

We would also like to thank the Sportclub Magdeburg for the opportunity to study elite athletes, the coaches for their support, and the athletes for their willingness to participate in the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abernethy, B. (1987). Selective attention in fast ball sports: II: expert-novice differences. Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 19(4), 7–16.Google Scholar
  2. Abernethy, B. (1988). Visual search in sport and ergonomics: its relationship to selective attention and performer expertise. Human Performance, 1(4), 205–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves, H., Voss, M. W., Boot, W. R., Deslandes, A., Cossich, V., Salles, J. I., & Kramer, A. F. (2013). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in elite volleyball players. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(36), 1–9.Google Scholar
  4. Annac, E., Manginelli, A. A., Pollmann, S., Shi, Z., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2013). Memory under pressure: secondary-task effects on contextual cueing of visual search. Journal of Vision, 13(13), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bavelier, D., Green, C. S., Han, D. H., Renshaw, P. F., Merzenich, M. M., & Gentile, D. A. (2011). Brains on video games. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(12), 763–768.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bediou, B., Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., Tipton, E., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2018). Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 77–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bejjanki, V. R., Zhang, R., Li, R., Green, C. S., Lu, Z. L., & Bavelier, D. (2014). Action video game play facilitates the development of better perceptual templates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(47), 16961–16966.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F., Simons, D. J., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2008). The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. Acta Psychologica, 129, 387–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Boot, W. R., Blakely, D. P., & Simons, D. J. (2011). Do action video games improve perception and cognition? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 798–815.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brockmole, W. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckley, D., Codina, C., Bhardwaj, P., & Pascalis, O. (2010). Action video game players and deaf observers have larger Goldmann visual fields. Vision Research, 50(5), 548–556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., & Drummond, E. (2005). The effects of action video game experience on the time course of inhibition of return and the efficiency of visual search. Acta Psychologica, 119, 217–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaddock, L., Neider, M. B., Voss, M. W., Gaspar, J. G., & Kramer, A. F. (2011). Do athletes excel at everyday tasks? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 43(10), 1920–1926.Google Scholar
  16. Chisholm, J. D., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Improved top-down control reduces oculomotor capture: the case of action video game players. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(2), 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chisholm, J. D., Hickey, C., Theeuwes, J., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Reduced attentional capture in action video game players. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 667–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chua, K.-P., & Chun, M. M. (2003). Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(1), 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cuing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170–178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clark, J. E., Lanphear, A. K., & Riddick, C. C. (1987). The effects of videogame playing on the response selection processing of elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42(1), 82–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Colagiuri, B., & Livesey, E. J. (2016). Contextual cuing as a form of nonconscious learning: theoretical and empirical analysis in large and very large samples. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1996–2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deveau, J., Ozer, D. J., & Seitz, A. R. (2014). Improved vision and on-field performance in baseball through perceptual learning. Current Biology, 24, 146–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dye, M. W. G., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2009). Increasing speed of processing with action video games. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(6), 321–326.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 685–705). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Faubert, J. (2013). Professional athletes have extraordinary skills for rapidly learning complex and neutral dynamic visual scenes. Scientific Reports, 3, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18(10), 850–855.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2010). Differences in spatial working memory as a function of team sports expertise: the Corsi Block-tapping task in sport psychological assessment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110, 801–808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2011). Studying cognitive adaptions in the field of sport: broad or narrow transfer? A comment on Allen, Fioratou, and McGeorge (2011). Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113(2), 481–488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Geringswald, F., & Pollmann, S. (2015). Central and peripheral vision loss differentially affects contextual cueing in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1485–1496.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Geyer, T., Zehetleitner, M., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Contextual cueing of pop-out visual search: when context guides the deployment of attention. Journal of Vision, 10(5), 20 1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Thorpe, S. (2015). Investigating implicit statistical learning mechanisms through contextual cueing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(9), 524–533.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534–537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2006). Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1465–1478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2007). Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision. Psychological Science, 18(1), 88–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2012). Learning, attentional control, and action video games. Current Biology, 22, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Green, C. S., Kattner, F., Eichenbaum, A., Bediou, B., Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Bavelier, D. (2017). Playing some video games but not others is related to cognitive abilities: a critique of Unsworth et al. (2015). Psychological Science, 28, 679–682.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Greenfield, P. M., DeWinstanley, P., Kilpatrick, H., & Kaye, D. (1994). Action video games and informal education: effects on strategies for dividing visual attention. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hubert-Wallander, B., Green, C. S., Sugarman, M., & Bavelier, D. (2011). Changes in search rate but not in the dynamics of exogenous attention in action videogame players. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2399–2412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hüttermann, S., Memmert, D., & Simons, D. J. (2014). The size and shape of the attentional “spotlight” varies with differences in sports expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(2), 147–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Irons, J. L., Remington, R. W., & McLean, J. P. (2011). Not so fast: rethinking the effects of action video games on attentional capacity [abstract]. Australian Journal of Psychology, 63(4), 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jiang, Y., & Leung, A. W. (2005). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jiang, Y., & Wagner, L. C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextual cuing—configuration or individual locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 454–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kristjánsson, Á. (2013). The case for causal influences of action videogame play upon vision and attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(4), 667–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li, R., Polat, U., Makous, W., & Bavelier, D. (2009). Enhancing the contrast sensitivity function through action video game training. Nature Neuroscience, 12(5), 549–551.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Lleras, A., & von Mühlenen, A. (2004). Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. Spatial Vision, 17(4–5), 465–482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lum, J., Enns, J. T., & Pratt, J. (2002). Visual orienting in college athletes: explorations of athlete type and gender. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(2), 156–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Manginelli, A. A., Langer, N., Klose, D., & Pollmann, S. (2013). Contextual cueing under working memory load: selective interference of visuospatial load with expression of learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(6), 1103–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mann, D. T. Y., Williams, A. M., Ward, P., & Janelle, C. M. (2007). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: a meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29(4), 457–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Memmert, D., Simons, D. J., & Grimme, T. (2009). The relationship between visual attention and expertise in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 146–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Müller-Plath, G., Ott, D., & Pollmann, S. (2010). Deficits in subprocesses of visual feature search after frontal, parietal, and temporal brain lesions—a modeling approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1399–1424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Murphy, K. (2017). The field of view is more useful in golfers than regular exercisers. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 13, 64–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Nougier, V., Ripoll, H., & Stein, J.-F. (1989). Orienting of attention in highly-skilled athletes. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 20, 205–223.Google Scholar
  55. Oudejans, R. R., Michaels, C. F., & Bakker, F. C. (1997). The effects of baseball experience on movement initiation in catching fly balls. Journal of Sports Sciences, 15(6), 587–595.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Pesce-Anzeneder, C., & Bösel, R. (1998). Modulation of the spatial extent of the attentional focus in high-level volleyball players. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10(3), 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. R Development Core Team (2007). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  59. Schmidt, A., Geringswald, F., Sharifian, F., & Pollmann, S. (2018). Not scene learning, but attentional processing is superior in team sport athletes and action video game players. bioRxiv.  https://doi.org/10.1101/353953.
  60. Simon, H. A., & Chase, W. G. (1973). Skill in chess. American Scientist, 61, 394–403.Google Scholar
  61. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (2010). The invisible gorilla: how our intuitions deceive us [abstract]. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  62. Smyth, A. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2008). Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Memory & Cognition, 36(2), 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Song, J. H., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Connecting the past with the present: how do humans match an incoming visual display with visual memory? Journal of Vision, 5, 322–330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Starkes, J. L., & Ericsson, K. A. (Eds.) (2003). Expert performance in sports: advances in research on sport expertise. Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  65. Tenenbaum, G., & Eklund, R. C. (2007). Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 161–262). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thomas, J. R., Gallagher, J., & Lowry, K. (2003). Developing motor and sport expertise: meta-analytic findings. In Communication to the Conference North American Society of Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity, Savannah, GA. In J. G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 161–178). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..Google Scholar
  67. Vadillo, M. A., Konstantinidis, E., & Shanks, D. R. (2016). Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vestberg, T., Gustafson, R., Maurex, L., Ingvar, M., & Petrovic, P. (2012). Executive functions predict the success of top-soccer players. PLoS One, 7(4), e34731.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Vickery, T. J., Sussman, R. S., & Jiang, Y. V. (2010). Spatial context learning survives interference from working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1358–1371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Voss, M. W., Kramer, A. F., Basak, C., Prakash, R. S., & Roberts, B. (2010). Are expert athletes ‘expert’ in the cognitive laboratory? A meta-analytic review of cognition and sport expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 812–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Experimental PsychologyOtto-von-Guericke UniversityMagdeburgGermany
  2. 2.Center for Behavioral Brain SciencesOtto-von-Guericke UniversityMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations