Advertisement

The ‘Agapic Behaviors’: Reconciling Organizational Citizenship Behavior with the Reward System

  • Roberta SferrazzoEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

Current corporate systems risk generating inequality among workers, insofar as they concentrate only on economic results by favoring, through the incentive and award system, only what can be seen, produced, and measured. As such, these systems are unable to recognize workers’ agapic behaviors – similar to the ones considered in organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) literature – that cannot be quantified, i.e. workers’ generosity, humanity, kindness, compassion, help for others and mercy. Although these types of behaviors may appear unproductive or irrational, they create symbols of belonging to the company and social cohesion. This article claims that beyond focusing on reward systems, companies should recognize agapic behaviors to increase workers’ intrinsic motivation. These behavioral attitudes allow fraternal relationships -as conceived in the Civil Economy tradition- to arise within organizations; moreover, they contribute to advancing new managerial practical implications in the humanistic management field.

Keywords

Agapic behaviors Awards Civil economy Humanistic management Organizational citizenship behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Paolo Santori for his useful comments on this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

“This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.”

References

  1. Acevedo, Alma. 2012. Personalist business ethics and humanistic management: Insights from Jacques Maritain. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2): 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1980. Pure love. The Journal of Religious Ethics: 83–99.Google Scholar
  3. Amann, Wolfgang, and Agata Stachowicz-Stanusch. 2012. Integrity in organizations: Building the foundations for humanistic management. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Marc H., and Peter Y.T. Sun. 2017. Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full-range’theory. International Journal of Management Reviews 19 (1): 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ariely, Dan, Anat Bracha, and Stephan Meier. 2009. Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review 99 (1): 544–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bal, M, & Lub, XD. 2015. Individualization of work arrangements. Idiosyncratic Deals between Employees and Organizations: Conceptual issues, applications and the role of co-workers, 9.Google Scholar
  7. Bal, PM, and XD Lub. 2015. Individualization of Work Arrangements: A Contextualized Perspective on the Rise and Use of i-Deals. In Idiosyncratic Deals Between Employees and Organizations: Conceptual Issues, Applications, and the Role of Coworkers, eds. P.M. Bal and D.M. Rousseau, 9–23. London: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bal, P. Matthijs, and Simon B. de Jong. 2017. From human resource management to human dignity development: A dignity perspective on HRM and the role of workplace democracy. In Dignity and the Organization, ed. Monika Kostera and Michael Pirson, 173–195. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, Garey Stanley, and Gary S. Becker. 2009. A Treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Belk, Russell W., and Gregory S. Coon. 1993. Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of consumer research 20 (3): 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bénabou, Roland, and Jean Tirole. 2003. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The review of economic studies 70 (3): 489–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bénabou, Roland, and Jean Tirole. 2006. Incentives and prosocial behavior. American economic review 96 (5): 1652–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boltanski, Luc. 1990. L’amour et la justice comme compétences. Paris: Métailié.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boselie, Paul. 2010. Strategic human resource management: A balanced approach. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Bowie, Norman E. 1999. Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Bowles, Samuel, and Sandra Polania-Reyes. 2012. Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements? Journal of Economic Literature 50 (2): 368–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bruni, Luigino. 2008. Reciprocity, altruism and the civil society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bruni, Luigino. 2013. On virtues and awards: Giacinto Dragonetti and the tradition of economia civile in enlightenment Italy. Journal of the History of Economy Thought 35 (4): 517–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bruni, Luigino, and Pier Luigi Porta. 2003. Economia civile and pubblica felicita in the Italian Enlightenment. History of Political Economy 35 (1): 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bruni, Luigino, and Alessandra Smerilli. 2009. The Value of Vocation. The Crucial Role of Intrinsically Motivated People in Values-based Organizations. Review of Social Economy 67 (3): 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bruni, Luigino, and Robert Sugden. 2000. Moral canals: Trust and social capital in the work of Hume, Smith and Genovesi. Economics and Philosophy 16 (1): 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bruni, Luigino, and Robert Sugden. 2008. Fraternity: Why the market need not be a morally free zone. Economics and Philosophy 24 (1): 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bruni, Luigino, and Stefano Zamagni. 2016. Civil Economy: Another idea of the market. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bruni, L, Pelligra, V, Reggiani, T, & Rizzolli, M. 2019. The Pied Piper: Prizes, Incentives, and Motivation Crowding-in. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-16.Google Scholar
  25. Chater, Nick, and George Loewenstein. 2016. The under-appreciated drive for sense-making. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 126 (B): 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Collins, Randall. 1981. On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology 86 (5): 985–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Collins, Randall. 1988. Theoretical sociology. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  28. Dierksmeier, Claus. 2016. Reframing economic ethics: The philosophical foundations of humanistic management. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dokko, Gina, Aimée A. Kane, and Marco Tortoriello. 2013. One of us or one of my friends: How Social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies 35 (5): 703–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dragonetti, Giacinto. 1769. A treatise on virtues and rewards. London: Johnson and Payne.Google Scholar
  31. Durkheim, Emile. 1961. The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  32. Ellingsen, Tore, and Magnus Johannesson. 2007. Paying respect. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (4): 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Festré, Agnes, and Pierre Garrouste. 2015. Theory and evidence in psychology and economics about motivation crowding out: A possible convergence? Journal of Economic Surveys 29 (2): 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Foley, Janice R, Polanyi, Michael. 2016 Workplace Democracy: Why Bother?. Economic and Industrial Democracy 27 (1):173-191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Frey, Bruno S. 1997. Not Just for the Money. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  36. Frey, Bruno S., and Jana Gallus. 2017. Honours versus money. The economics of awards. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Frey, Bruno S., and Reto Jegen. 2001. Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys 15 (5): 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frey, Bruno S., and Felix Oberholzer-Gee. 1997. The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. The American Economic Review 87 (4): 746–755.Google Scholar
  39. Frye, Harrison P. 2017. Incentives, offers, and community. Economics & Philosophy 33 (3): 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gallus, Jana, and Bruno S. Frey. 2017. Awards as strategic signals. Journal of Management Inquiry 26 (1): 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Garrett, Lyndon E., M. Spreitzer Gretchen, and A. Bacevice Peter. 2017. Co-constructing a Sense of Community at Work: The Emergence of Community in Coworking Spaces. Organization Studies 38 (6): 821–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ghoshal, Sumantra. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education 4 (1): 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gladwin, Thomas N., James J. Kennelly, and Tara-Shelomith Krause. 1995. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of management Review 20 (4): 874–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gneezy, Uri, and Aldo Rustichini. 2000a. Pay enough or don't pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 791–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gneezy, Uri, and Aldo Rustichini. 2000b. A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gneezy, Uri, Stephan Meier, and Pedro Rey-Biel. 2011. When and why incentives (don't) work to modify behavior. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (4): 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual; essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  48. Grant, Adam M. 2013. Give and take: A revolutionary approach to success. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  49. Greenwood, M.R. 2002. Ethics and HRM: A Review and Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 36(3): 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gubler, Timothy, Ian Larkin, and Lamar Pierce. 2016. Motivational Spillovers from Awards. Organization Science 27 (2): 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hahn, Tobias, Ans Kolk, and Monika Winn. 2010. A new future for business? Rethinking management theory and business strategy. Business & Society 49 (3): 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hartman, Edwin M. 2015. Rationality in Management Theory and Practice: An Aristotelian Perspective. Philosophy of Management 14 (1): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hicks, Donna. 2011. Dignity: The essential role it plays in resolving conflict. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Hicks, Donna. 2018. Leading with dignity. London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Karlsson, Niklas, George Loewenstein, and Jane McCafferty. 2004. The Economics of Meaning. Nordic Journal of Political Economy 30 (1): 61–75.Google Scholar
  56. Kerr, Steven B. 1975. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal 18 (4): 769–783.Google Scholar
  57. Klotz, Anthony C., Mark C. Bolino, Hairong Song, and Jason Stornelli. 2018. Examining the nature, causes, and consequences of profiles of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior 39 (5): 629–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kostera, Monika, and Michael Pirson. 2017. Dignity and the Organization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lamertz, Kai. 2005. Organizational Citizenship Behaviour as Performance in Multiple Network Positions. Organization Studies 27 (1): 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Latemore, Greg. 2017. Dignity and leadership: implications of leaders’ language and their assumptions of human nature. In Dignity and the organization, ed. Monika Koster and Michael Pirson, 149–171. London: Palgrave Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Latham, Gary P., and Edwin A. Locke. 2007. New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologist 12 (4): 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lawrence, Thomas B. 2004. Rituals and resistance: Membership dynamics in professional fields. Human Relations 57 (2): 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lazear, Edward P. 2018. Compensation and Incentives in the Workplace. Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (3): 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. LePine, Jeffrey A., Amir Erez, and Diane E. Johnson. 2002. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (1): 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lewis, Clive Staples. 1991. The four loves. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  66. Loewenstein, George. 1999. Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics. The Economic Journal 109 (February): F25–F34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mannen, Delia, and Lorissa MacAllister. 2017. Dignity by design: A shift from formalistic to humanistic design in organizations. In Dignity and the organization, ed. Monika Koster and Michael Pirson, 221–244. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Melé, Domenèc. 2003. The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (1): 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Melé, Domènec. 2012. The Christian notion of Αγάπη (agápē): Towards a more complete view of business ethics. In Leadership through the Classics, 79–91. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Melé, Domènec, and Martin Schlag. 2015. Christian humanism in economics and business. In Humanism in Economics and Business, 1–10. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Milbank, John. 2007. The Gift and the Mirror. In Counter-Experiences: Reading JeanLuc Marion, ed. Kevin Hart, 253–318. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  72. Neckermann, Susanne, and Bruno S. Frey. 2013. And the Winner is…? The Motivating Power of Employee Awards. Journal of Socio-Economics 46: 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nugent, Paul D., and Mitchel Y. Abolafia. 2006. The creation of trust through interaction and exchange: The role of consideration in organizations. Group & Organization Management 31: 628–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nygren, Anders. 1953. Agape and Eros. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  75. Organ, Dennis W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  76. Organ, Dennis W. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance 10: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Organ, Dennis W., Philip M. Podsakoff, and Scott B. MacKenzie. 2006. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  78. Osterloh, Margit, and Bruno S. Frey. 2004. Corporate Governance for Crooks? The Case for Corporate Virtue. In Corporate Governance and Firm Organization: Microfoundations and Structural Forms, ed. A. Grandori, 191–211. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Paauwe, Jaap. 2009. HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management studies 46 (1): 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pirson, Michael. 2016. Humanistic management: Protecting dignity and promoting well being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Pirson, Michael. 2017a. A Humanistic Perspective for Management Theory: Protecting Dignity and Promoting Well-Being. Journal of Business Ethics: 1–19.Google Scholar
  82. Pirson, Michael. 2017b. Humanistic management: Protecting dignity and promoting well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pirson, Michael A., and Paul R. Lawrence. 2010. Humanism in business— Towards a paradigm shift? Journal of Business Ethics 93 (4): 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Podsakoff, Nathan P., Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. MacKenzie, Timothy D. Maynes, and Trevor M. Spoelma. 2014. Consequences of unit-level organizational citizenship behaviors: A review and recommendations for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior 35: S87–S119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rayner, Julie, Alan Lawton, and Helen M. Williams. 2012. Organizational citizenship behavior and the public service ethos: Whither the organization? Journal of business ethics 106 (2): 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rosso, Brent D., Kathryn H. Dekas, and Amy Wrzesniewski. 2010. On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior 30: 91–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ruffini, Renato. 2013. Economia civile e management. Milano: Guerini e associati.Google Scholar
  88. Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic definitions and new direction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sen, Amartya. 1985. Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  90. Simon, Herbert A. 1955. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (1): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational; Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  92. Simon, Herbert A. 1987. Behavioural economics. In The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  93. Spitzeck, Heiko. 2011. An integrated model of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics 99 (1): 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tasselli, Stefano. 2018. Love and Organization Studies: Moving beyond the Perspective of Avoidance. Organization Studies 40 (7): 1073–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Thaler, Richard H. 2016. Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future. American Economic review 106 (7): 1577–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Titmuss, Richard Morris. 1970. The gift relationship. From human blood to social policy. London: Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.“Sciences of Civil Economy”, Department of LawLUMSA UniversityPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations