Advertisement

Risks of non-conservative design according to ASME B31.1 for high-temperature piping subjected to long-term operation in the creep range

  • Hyeong-Yeon LeeEmail author
  • Seok-Kwon Son
  • Min-Gu Won
  • Ji-Young Jeong
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates the risks of non-conservative piping design according to ASME B31.1 for high-temperature piping subjected to long-term operation at high temperature in a creep regime based on a sensitivity analysis of the hold time. Design evaluations of high-temperature piping were conducted over a range of hold times in the creep regime according to ASME B31.1, which implicitly considers the creep effects, and the French high-temperature design code of the RCC-MRx, which explicitly considers the creep effects. Conservatisms were quantified among the codes in terms of the hold times. In the case of B31.1, the design evaluation results do not change depending on the hold time at high temperature, whereas in the case of RCC-MRx, they do. It was shown that the design limits of RCC-MRx were exceeded when the hold time exceeded certain values, whereas those of B31.1 were satisfied regardless of the hold times. Thus, the design evaluations according to B31.1 did not consistently yield conservative results and might lead to non-conservative results in the case of long-term operations in the creep range.

Keywords

ASME B31.1 Creep Hold time High-temperature piping RCC-MRx Sensitivity analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    ASME B31.1, ASME Code for Power Piping, ASME (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Rules for Construction of Nuclear Power Plant Components, Division 5, High temperature reactors, ASME (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II Part D, ASME (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.J. Cohn, F. Faham, D. Patel, Ranking of creep damage in main steam piping system girth welds considering multiaxial stress ranges. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 138(4), 041202 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.J. Cohn, Creep life evaluations of ASME B31.1 allowance for variation from normal operation. PRESs VES P, Transactions of ASME, August, 138, ASME 041405-1~4 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abram et al., Status of Fast Reactor Research and Technology Development, IAEA-TECDOC-1691, IAEA (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.-H. Eoh, J.-W. Lee, H. Kim et al., Sodium Thermal-hydraulic test for design validation of prototype Gen-IV sodium-cooled fast reactor, April 8-11, Charlotte, NC, USA, 2018 ICAPP (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.-Y. Lee, K.-N. Song, Y.-W. Kim et al., An evaluation of creep–fatigue damage for prototype process heat exchanger of the NHDD plant. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 133(5), 051208 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    RCC-MRx, Tome 1, Section III Subsection B, Class 1 N1RX Reactor Components its Auxiliary Systems and Supports, AFCEN (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.-Y. Lee, Comparison of elevated temperature design codes of ASME subsection NH and RCC-MRx. Nucl. Eng. Des. 308, 142–153 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.08.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.-Y. Lee, J.-B. Kim, J.-H. Eoh et al., High temperature design and damage evaluation of Mod.9Cr-1Mo steel heat exchanger. No. PVP2011-57756, p. 409–416. ASME 2011 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, July 17–21 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2011-57756
  12. 12.
    H.-Y. Lee, J.-B. Kim, H.-Y. Park, Creep–fatigue damage evaluation of sodium to air heat exchanger in sodium test loop facility. Nucl. Eng. Des. 250, 308–316 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.05.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H.-Y. Lee, H. Kim, J.-B. Kim et al., Design and integrity evaluation of a finned-tube sodium-to-air heat exchanger in a sodium test facility. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 139(3), 031203 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.-Y. Lee, M.-G. Won, S.-K. Son et al., Development of a program for high-temperature design evaluation according to RCC-MRx. Nucl. Eng. Des. 324, 181–195 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.08.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    RCC-MRx, Section III Tome 1, Subsection Z, Appendix A3, AFCEN (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASME B31.3, ASME Code for Process Piping, ASME (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. (Science Press), Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Nuclear Society and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyeong-Yeon Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Seok-Kwon Son
    • 2
  • Min-Gu Won
    • 3
  • Ji-Young Jeong
    • 1
  1. 1.Korea Atomic Energy Research InstituteDaejeonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.National Fusion Research InstituteDaejeonRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.School of Mechanical EngineeringSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations