Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 315–321 | Cite as

Trump, Brexit & “Post-Truth”: How Post-Structuralist IR Theories can help us understand World Order in the 21st century

  • Judith Renner
  • Alexander SpencerEmail author

Many claim that we live in a “post-truth” world order which disregards “facts” and in which emotions are more important than reason (d’Ancona 2017; Ball 2017; Davis 2017). And without doubt in many debates on the current development of international politics and world order the aspect of “post-truth” politics is considered to be a vital element. With the rise of populist movements around the world, the Brexit decision in the UK and the election of Donald Trump in the US, the delegitimation of expert knowledge, claiming of “fake news” and referral to “alternative facts” seem to have taken centre stage. It is these elements of world order that this short essay wants to reflect on by considering what IR theory has to say about “(post)-truth” as a situation “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief”.1In particular it will focus on post-structuralist approaches to IR for two...


  1. dʼAncona, Matthew. 2017. Post-truth: the new war on truth and how to fight back. London: Ebury.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, James. 2017. Post-truth: how bullshit conquered the world. London: Biteback.Google Scholar
  3. Cadwalladr, Carole. 2017. Daniel Dennett: “I begrudge every hour I have to spend worrying about politics”. The Guardian. (Created 12 Feb 2017). Accessed 10 Aug 2018.Google Scholar
  4. Calcutt, Andrew. 2016. The surprising origins of “post-truth”—and how it was spawned by the liberal left. The Conversation. (Created 18 Nov 2016). Accessed 9 Aug 2018.Google Scholar
  5. Conway, Philip. 2017. Post-truth, complicity and international politics. E‑International Relations. Accessed 8 Aug 2018.Google Scholar
  6. Crilley, Rhys. 2017. Book review essay. International relations in the age of “post-truth” politics. International Affairs 94(2):417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crilley, Rhys, and N. Chaterje-Doody. 2018. Security studies in the age of “post-truth”: in defence of poststructuralism. Critical Studies on Security Scholar
  8. Davis, Evan. 2017. Post-truth: why we have reached peak bullshit and what we can do about it. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  9. Delton, Jennifer. 2017. Don’t absolve postmodernism so quickly. The Chronical of Higher Education. (Created 15 Aug 2017). Accessed 9 Aug 2018.Google Scholar
  10. Epstein, Charlotte. 2008. The power of words in international relations. Birth of an anti-whaling discourse. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fluck, Matthew. 2010. Truth, values and the value of truth in critical international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(2):259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Houston, Kenneth. 2018. The necessity of postmodernism in the post-truth age. Areo Magazin. Accessed 10 Aug 2018.Google Scholar
  13. Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International relations theory: contributions of a feminist standpoint. Millennium 18(2):245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khan, Gulshan, and Mark Wenman. 2017. The politics of poststructuralism today. Political Studies Review 15(4):513–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Perrin, Andrew J. 2017. Stop blaming postmodernism for post-truth politics. The Chronical of Higher Education. (Created 4 Aug 2017). Accessed 9 Aug 2017.Google Scholar
  16. Pluckrose, Helen. 2017. How French “intellectuals” ruined the west: postmodernism and its impact, explained. Areo Magazine. Accessed 9 Aug 2018.Google Scholar
  17. Scruton, Roger. 2017. Post-truth? It’s pure nonsense. The Spectator. Accessed 9 Aug 2018.Google Scholar
  18. Stuart, Duncan. 2017. Make postmodernism great again: on the ills of blaming theory for Trump. Demos Journal. (Created 14 June 2017). Accessed 10 Aug 2018.
  19. Waldman, Paul. 2016. How Donald Trump is turning the GOP into a postmodernist part. The American Prospect. (Created 5 Dec 2016). Accessed 10 Aug 2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TUM School of Governance, Professur für PolitikwissenschaftTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany
  2. 2.Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften, Bereich PolitikwissenschaftenOtto-von-Guericke-Universität MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations