Advertisement

Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

, Volume 126, Issue 4, pp 343–349 | Cite as

Standardization of DNA extraction protocol and screening of begomovirus in chilli and tomato plants

  • R. Lavanya
  • V. ArunEmail author
Original Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Extraction of high-quality genomic DNA is an important requisite for a number of molecular- and genome-based studies. Isolation of good quantity and quality of genomic DNA from plant materials is a major concern for molecular biologists as many of them contain large amount of polysaccharides, phenolics and secondary metabolites. The presence of polyphenols and polysaccharides in plants results in a brown–dark brown-coloured, contaminated DNA which is sticky and viscous in nature. In our present study, we performed DNA isolation from two plants (tomato and chilli) using Dellaporta, modified CTAB, phenanthroline-based, CaCl2-based DNA extraction protocols (with and without high-salt Tris-EDTA buffer treatment). For chilli plants, Dellaporta method with high-salt TE buffer treatment was found to be better than other methods, and for tomato plants modified CTAB and phenanthroline-based methods without high-salt TE treatment were better. To further confirm the applicability, total DNA was isolated from 99 chilli samples using Dellaporta method with high-salt TE treatment. The plants were then screened for geminivirus and 49 were found to be positive. Furthermore, one of the PCR products of Deng primer was cloned and analysis of the clones showed the presence of insert, thus confirming the applicability of the DNA extraction method for detection of virus, PCR and cloning.

Keywords

Geminivirus Chilli plant Tomato plant Coat protein CTAB method Polyphenolics PCR 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the SRIHER management for the Founder Chancellor Sri N.P.V. Ramasamy Udayar Research Fellowship (2013).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

Institutional ethical clearance was obtained for this study, IEC-NI/14/DEC/44/75, dated December 22, 2014.

References

  1. Bandaranayake W, Wickramarachchi W, Wickramasinghe H, Rajapakshe R, Dissanayake D (2014) Molecular detection and characterization of begomoviruses associated with cucurbitaceae vegetables in Sri Lanka. J Natl Sci Found Sri Lanka 42:265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnwell P, Blanchard AN, Bryant JA, Smirnoff N, Weir AF (1998) Isolation of DNA from the highly mucilagenous succulent plant shape Sedum telephium. Plant Mol Biol Rep 16:133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng YJ, Guo WW, Yi HL, Pang XM, Deng X (2003) An efficient protocol for genomic DNA extraction from Citrus species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 21:177–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demeke T, Adams RP (1992) The effects of plant polysaccharides and buffer additives on PCR. Biotechniques 12:332–334Google Scholar
  6. Deng D, Mcgrath PF, Robinson DJ, Harrison BD (1994) Detection and differentiation of whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses in plants and vector insects by the polymerase chain reaction with degenerate primers. Ann Appl Biol 125:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deore P, Samantaray S, Maiti S (2014) Genomic DNA isolation protocol for aloe barbadensis miller: using leaf gel for genetic characterization. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 4:1–5Google Scholar
  8. Doyle JJ (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 12:13–15Google Scholar
  9. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull Bot Soc Am 19:11–15Google Scholar
  10. Henson JM, French R (1993) The polymerase chain reaction and plant disease diagnosis. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31:81–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jabbarzadeh Z, Khosh-Khui M, Salehi H, Saberivand A et al (2009) Optimization of DNA extraction for ISSR studies in seven important rose species of Iran. American–Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 3:639–642Google Scholar
  12. Jitendra K (2018) Detection of gemini virus in cassava and differentiation between SLCMV and ICMV by multiplex PCR. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10:5255–5259Google Scholar
  13. Katterman FR, Shattuck VI (1983) An effective method of DNA isolation from the mature leaves of Gossypium species that contain large amounts of phenolic terpenoids and tannins. Prep Biochem 13:347–359Google Scholar
  14. Khanuja SPS, Shasany AK, Darokar MP, Kumar S (1999) Rapid isolation of DNA from dry and fresh samples of plants producing large amounts of secondary metabolites and essential oils. Plant Mol Biol Rep 17:74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kiss T, Szkukálek A, Solymosy F (1989) Nucleotide sequence of a 17S (18S) rRNA gene from tomato. Nucleic Acids Res 17:2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Niu C, Kebede H, Auld DL, Woodward JE, Burow G, Wright RJ (2008) A safe inexpensive method to isolate high quality plant and fungal DNA in an open laboratory environment. Afr J Biotechnol 7(16):2818–2822Google Scholar
  17. Peterson DG, Boehm KS, Stack SM (1997) Isolation of milligram quantities of nuclear DNA from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), a plant containing high levels of polyphenolic compounds. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15:148–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Porebski S, Bailey LG, Baum BR (1997) Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saha A, Saha B, Saha D (2014) Molecular detection and partial characterization of a begomovirus causing leaf curl disease of potato in sub-Himalayan West Bengal, India. J Environ Biol 35:601–606Google Scholar
  20. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. CSHL Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  21. Senanayake DMJB, Mandal B, Lodha S, Varma A (2007) First report of Chilli leaf curl virus affecting chilli in India. Plant Pathol 56:343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stanley J (1983) Infectivity of the cloned geminivirus genome requires sequences from both DNAs. Nature 305:643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Varma A, Malathi VG (2003) Emerging geminivirus problems: a serious threat to crop production. Ann Appl Biol 142:145–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Varma A, Padh H, Shrivastava N (2007) Plant genomic DNA isolation: an art or a science. Biotechnol J 2:386–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wasswa P, Otto B, Maruthi MN, Mukasa SB, Monger W, Gibson RW (2011) First identification of a sweet potato begomovirus (sweepovirus) in Uganda: characterization, detection and distribution. Plant Pathol 60:1030–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologySri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER)ChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations