Advertisement

Evaluating the Relationship Between Multimedia Viewing, Sedentary Behavior, and Executive Function: a Systematic Review

  • Dean McDonnellEmail author
  • Evan Hunt
  • Laura Griffin
  • Ryoko Sasamoto
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Research and discussions over the relationship between executive function, multimedia viewing, and sedentary human behavior are becoming increasingly popular throughout academia and mainstream media. While some studies report screen-viewing behavior as being associated with reduced levels of physical activity, other studies have also reported associations with higher levels of cognitive activity. The aim of this paper is to establish the relationship between multimedia viewing, sedentary behavior, and executive function. In achieving this aim, the main objectives are to (1) identify a framework to specify core characteristics of visual stimuli that may influence behavior and (2) identify the ways executive functions may mediate the interpretation of visual media. Literature searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, PsychInfo and PsychArticles, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science. Methods of assessment reported in the literature were predominantly reliant on experimenter observation and participant self-report, without psychometric, empirical, or objective measurement of the core variables under study. Despite a sizable proportion of research conducting large-scale experiments and/or secondary analysis of data from longitudinal databases, there were no indications of the characteristics or styles of visual stimuli used. The myriad of published works range in methodological design, resource, and stimuli use or sample population. Raising a question of comparability and replicability, recommendations are made for researchers in reporting multimedia stimuli and importance in addressing the role of cognitive engagement and social interaction within the methodological design and reporting.

Keywords

Cognition Executive function Multimedia Sedentary behavior Screen viewing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express thanks to the Centre for Translation and Textual Studies of Dublin City University for their support in carrying out this research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Considerations

While this paper involved no recruitment of participants, ethical approval was granted by Dublin City University.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ackerman, P. L. (1990). A correlational analysis of skill specificity: Learning, abilities, and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 883–901.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.5.883.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman, P. L., & Cianciolo, A. T. (2000). Cognitive, perceptual speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 259–290.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.6.4.259.Google Scholar
  3. Baller, G., Brand, M., Kalbe, E., & Kessler, J. (2006). Inventar zur Gedächtnisdiagnostik (IGD), Manual. Goettingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  4. Barry, D., Bates, M. E., & Labouvie, E. (2008). FAS and CFL forms of verbal fluency differ in difficulty: A metaanalytic study. Applied Neuropsychology, 15(2), 97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280802083863.Google Scholar
  5. Benzing, V., Heinks, T., Eggenberger, N., & Schmidt, M. (2016). Acute cognitively engaging exergame-based physical activity enhances executive functions in adolescents. PLoS One, 11(12), e0167501.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167501.Google Scholar
  6. Best, J. R. (2012). Exergaming immediately enhances children’s executive function. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1501–1510.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026648.Google Scholar
  7. Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2012). Child development in the context of adversity: experiential canalization of brain and behavior. American Psychologist, 67(4), 309–318.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027493.Google Scholar
  8. Bovend’eerdt, J., Kemper, H. C. G., & Verschuur, R. (1980). MOPER fitnesstest: Handleiding en Prestatieschalen [The MOPER fitness test: manual and performance scales]. Haarlem: De Vrieseborch.Google Scholar
  9. Broadbent, E., Peri, K., Kerse, N., Jayawardena, C., Kuo, I., Datta, C., & MacDonald, B. (2014, October). Robots in older people’s homes to improve medication adherence and quality of life: a randomised cross-over trial. In International conference on social robotics (pp. 64–73). Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_7.Google Scholar
  10. Cai, Y., Zhu, X., & Wu, X. (2017). Overweight, obesity, and screen-time viewing among Chinese school-aged children: national prevalence estimates from the 2016 Physical Activity and Fitness in China—the youth study. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 6(4), 404–409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2017.09.002.Google Scholar
  11. Cartwright, M., Hirani, S. P., Rixon, L., Beynon, M., Doll, H., Bower, P., et al. (2013). Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 346, f653.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f653.Google Scholar
  12. Cobb, B.B., & Mathews, J.J. (1972). A proposed new test for aptitude screening of air traffic controller applicants (FAA-AM-72-18). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved 18/04/19 from National Transportation Library at https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/20997.
  13. Cohen, M., Ylvisaker, M., Hamilton, J., Kemp, L., & Claiman, B. (2010). Errorless learning of functional life skills in an individual with three aetiologies of severe memory and executive function impairment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(3), 355–376.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010903309401.Google Scholar
  14. Corrigan, J. D., & Hinkeldey, N. S. (1987). Relationships between parts A and B of the trail making test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 402–409.Google Scholar
  15. Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function system. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  16. Di Bartolo, C. A., & Braun, M. K. (2017). Screen time. In Pediatrician’s guide to discussing research with patients (pp. 207–223). Berlin: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49547-7_12.Google Scholar
  17. Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 318(5855), 1387–1388.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151148.Google Scholar
  18. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.Google Scholar
  19. Dubow, E. F., Huesmann, L. R., & Greenwood, D. (2007). Media and youth socialization: underlying processes and moderators of effects. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: theory and research (pp. 404–430). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Eggenberger, P., Wolf, M., Schumann, M., & de Bruin, E. D. (2016). Exergame and balance training modulate prefrontal brain activity during walking and enhance executive function in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8, 66.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00066.Google Scholar
  21. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for the kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  22. Flynn, R. M., & Richert, R. A. (2018). Cognitive, not physical, engagement in video gaming influences executive functioning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19(1), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2017.1419246.Google Scholar
  23. Free, C., Phillips, G., Galli, L., Watson, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., et al. (2013). The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Medicine, 10(1), e1001362.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362.Google Scholar
  24. Grøntved, A., & Hu, F. B. (2011). Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. Journal of American Medical Association, 305(23), 2448–2455.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.812.Google Scholar
  25. Guralnik, J., Simonsick, E., & Ferrucci, L. (1994). A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. Journal of Gerontology Medical Sciences, 42(2), 85–94.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.2.M85.Google Scholar
  26. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspectivetaking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.001.Google Scholar
  27. Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., et al. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. British Medical Journal, 343, d5928.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928.Google Scholar
  28. Homer, B. D., Plass, J. L., Rose, M. C., MacNamara, A. P., Pawar, S., & Ober, T. M. (2019). Activating adolescents’ “hot” executive functions in a digital game to train cognitive skills: The effects of age and prior abilities. Cognitive Development, 49, 20–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.11.005.Google Scholar
  29. Innocenti, A., Cammisuli, D. M., Sgromo, D., Franzoni, F., Fusi, J., Galetta, F., & Pruneti, C. (2017). Lifestyle, physical activity and cognitive functions: the impact on the scores of Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCa). Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 155(1–2), 25–32.  https://doi.org/10.12871/000398292017123.Google Scholar
  30. Kesse-Guyot, E., Charreire, H., Andreeva, V. A., Touvier, M., Hercberg, S., Galan, P., & Oppert, J. M. (2012). Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of different sedentary behaviors with cognitive performance in older adults. PLoS One, 7(10), e47831.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047831.Google Scholar
  31. Kommu, P. P. K., Solomon, S., Krishnan, L., Saravanan, S., & Ravichandran, K. (2017). The effect of cartoon on the immediate motor executive function of 4-6 year old children. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 4(5), 1648–1651.  https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20173648.Google Scholar
  32. Kucirkova, N., Messer, D., Sheehy, K., & Panadero, C. F. (2014). Children’s engagement with educational iPad apps: insights from a Spanish classroom. Journal of Computers & Education, 71, 175–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.003.Google Scholar
  33. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lorenz, R. C., Gleich, T., Gallinat, J., & Kühn, S. (2015). Video game training and the reward system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 40.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00040.Google Scholar
  35. Maillot, P., Perrot, A., & Hartley, A. (2012). Effects of interactive physical-activity video-game training on physical and cognitive function in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27(3), 589–600.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026268.Google Scholar
  36. Marusic, U., Giordani, B., Moffat, S. D., Petrič, M., Dolenc, P., Pišot, R., & Kavcic, V. (2018). Computerized cognitive training during physical inactivity improves executive functioning in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(1), 49–69.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2016.1263724.Google Scholar
  37. Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., et al. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.Google Scholar
  38. Nowak, N. T., & Moffat, S. D. (2011). The relationship between second to fourth digit ratio, spatial cognition, and virtual navigation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(3), 575–585.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9668-2.Google Scholar
  39. Nowak, N. T., Diamond, M. P., Land, S. J., & Moffat, S. D. (2014). Contributions of sex, testosterone, and androgen receptor CAG repeat number to virtual Morris water maze performance. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 41, 13–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.12.003.Google Scholar
  40. Ofcom. (2017). Adults’ media use and attitudes. Retrieved 19/01/2018 from Ofcom website at: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacyresearch/adults/adults-media-use-and-attitudes.
  41. Oswald, W. D., & Fleischmann, U. M. (1997). Das Nürnberger-Alters-Inventar [The Nürnberger-Alters Inventory]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  42. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery theory and interpretation. Tucson: AZ Neuropsychology Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (2013). Senior fitness test manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  44. Roberts, D. (2018). The engagement agenda, multimedia learning and the use of images in higher education lecturing: or, how to end death by PowerPoint. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(7), 969–985.Google Scholar
  45. Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42(8), 1029–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.012.Google Scholar
  46. Ruiz, J. R., Ortega, F. B., Castillo, R., Martín-Matillas, M., Kwak, L., Vicente-Rodríguez, G., Noriega, J., Tercedor, P., Sjöström, M., & Moreno, L. A. (2010). Physical activity, fitness, weight status, and cognitive performance in adolescents. The Journal of Pediatrics, 157(6), 917–922.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.06.026.Google Scholar
  47. Ruiz-Ariza, A., Casuso, R. A., Suarez-Manzano, S., & Martínez-López, E. J. (2018). Effect of augmented reality game Pokémon GO on cognitive performance and emotional intelligence in adolescent young. Computers & Education, 116, 49–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.002.Google Scholar
  48. Sánchez-Horcajo, R., Llamas-Alonso, J., & Cimadevilla, J. M. (2015). Practice of aerobic sports is associated with better spatial memory in adults and older men. Experimental Aging Research, 41(2), 193–203.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2015.1001656.Google Scholar
  49. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime (version 2.0). Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc. Retrieved 18/04/2019 from https://pstnet.com/products/e-prime/.
  50. Schuetz, R. L., Biancarosa, G., & Goode, J. (2018). Is technology the answer? Investigating students’ engagement in math. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1490937.Google Scholar
  51. Sedentary Behavior Research Network. (2012). Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviors”. Journal of Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 37(3), 540–542.  https://doi.org/10.1139/h2012-024.Google Scholar
  52. Sepede, G., Tavino, M., Santacroce, R., Fiori, F., Salerno, R. M., & Di Giannantonio, M. (2016). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of internet addiction in young adults. World Journal of Radiology, 8(2), 210–225.  https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.210.Google Scholar
  53. Tremblay, M. S., Aubert, S., Barnes, J. D., Saunders, T. J., Carson, V., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., et al. (2017). Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN)–terminology consensus project process and outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 75.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-525-8.Google Scholar
  54. Van Cauwenberge, A., Schaap, G., & Van Roy, R. (2014). “TV no longer commands our full attention”: effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 100–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.021.Google Scholar
  55. Van der Elst, W., van Boxtel, M. P., van Breukelen, G. J., & Jolles, J. (2005). Rey’s verbal learning test: Normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24-81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11(3), 290–302.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617705050344.Google Scholar
  56. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three- dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599.Google Scholar
  57. Wechsler, D. (1997a). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—3rd Edition (WAIS-3R). San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
  58. Wechsler, D. (1997b). Wechsler Memory Scale – 3rd Edition (WMS-III). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  59. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
  60. Yang, F., Helgason, A. R., Sigfusdottir, I. D., & Kristjansson, A. L. (2012). Electronic screen use and mental well-being of 10–12-year-old children. The European Journal of Public Health, 23(3), 492–498.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cks102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Technology and PsychologyInstitute of Art, Design, and TechnologyDublinIreland
  2. 2.School of PsychologyNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  3. 3.School of Applied Languages and Intercultural Studies, Centre for Translation and Textual StudiesDublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations