Advertisement

Spatial Information Research

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 49–62 | Cite as

Geo-spatial approach with frequency ratio method in landslide susceptibility mapping in the Busu River catchment, Papua New Guinea

  • Sujoy Kumar JanaEmail author
  • Tingneyuc Sekac
  • Dilip Kumar Pal
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

With the exacerbated kinetic energy of high volume of flowing water, the middle and lower catchment zones of a rugged terrain often become more prone to landslide. Almost half of Lae city, the second largest city in Papua New Guinea falling in the lower end of the catchment remains variably vulnerable to landslides. The study deliberates on the mapping of landslide sustainability, utilizing the geographical data sets such as terrain aspect and slope, land use land cover, site soil-geology, distance from river and distance from existing fault lines as input data for frequency ratio analysis culminating in delineation of susceptible landslide potential zones within the catchment area. The location of previous and recent landslide occurrence zones within the study region were identified and demarcated by dint of high resolution Google earth imagery complimented with the data gathered through field visit. All the thematic layers were prepared and organised for assignment of weights. The calculated frequency ratio values were assigned as weightage to each factor class. By using the weightage sum and raster calculator spatial analyst tool in ArcGIS 10.2.2 the results was generated. The result was then verified with known landslide occurrence and the cumulative % graph was constructed through calculated values. Furthermore the area under curve was calculated and validated with the ground truth information.

Keywords

Landslide Frequency ratio GIS Weighted sum AUC curve 

References

  1. 1.
    USGS Science for Changing World. (2004). Landslide types and processes. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fact Sheet 2004-3072. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2004/3072/fs-2004-3072.html. Accessed on April 05, 2018.
  2. 2.
    Corominas, J., van Westen, C., Frattini, P., Cascini, L., Malet, J. P., Fotopoulou, S., et al. (2014). Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 73, 209–263.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ba, Q. Q., Chen, Y. M., Deng, S. S., Wu, Q. J., Yang, J. X., & Zhang, J. Y. (2017). An improved information value model based on gray clustering for landslide susceptibility mapping. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feizizadeh, B., Roodposhti, M. S., Jankowski, P., & Blaschke, T. (2014). A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 73, 208–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pourghasemi, H. R., Pradhan, B., Gokceoglu, C., Mohammadi, M., & Moradi, H. R. (2013). Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6, 2351–2365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sekac, T., Jana, S. K., Pal, I., & Pal, D. K. (2016). Earthquake hazard assessment in the Momase region of Papua New Guinea. Spatial Information Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-016-0058-2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deng, X., Li, L., & Yufang, T. (2017). Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide susceptibility mapping by considering structural similarity. International Journal of Geo-Information, ISPRS, 6, 103.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6040103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rasyid, A. R., Bhandary, N. P., & Yatabe, R. (2016). Performance of frequency ratio and logistic regression model in creating GIS based landslides susceptibility map at Lompobattang Mountain, Indonesia. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 3, 19.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-016-0053-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Westen, C. J. V., Rengers, N., Terlien, M. T. J., & Soeters, R. (1997). Prediction of the occurrence of slope instability phenomena through GIS-based hazard zonation. Geologische Rundschau, 86, 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, S., & Pradhan, B. (2007). Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides, 4, 33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0047-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Solaimani, K., Mousavi, S. Z., & Kavian, A. (2013). Landslide susceptibility mapping based on frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6, 2557–2569.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0526-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park, S., Choi, C., Kim, B., & Kim, J. (2013). Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea. Environmental Earth Sciences, 68, 1443–1464.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1842-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Samanta, S., Pal, D. K., & Palsamanta, B. (2018). Flood susceptibility analysis through remote sensing, GIS and frequency ratio model. Applied Water Science, 8, 66.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0710-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sekac, T., Jana, S. K., & Pal, D. K. (2017). Identifying potential sites for hydropower plant development in Busu catchment: Papua New Guinea. Spatial Information Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0145-z.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guzzetti, F., Mondini, A. C., Cardinali, M., Fiorucci, F., Santangelo, M., & Chang, K. T. (2012). Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem. Earth Science Reviews, 112, 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, Z., Shi, W., Lu, P., Yan, L., Wang, Q., & Miao, Z. (2016). Landslide mapping from aerial photographs using change detection based Markov random field. Remote Sensing of Environment, 187, 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sekac, T., & Jana, S. K. (2014). Change detection of Busu River course in Papua New Guinea—Impact on local settlements using remote sensing and GIS technology. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5(8), 891–899.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clerici, A., Perego, S., Tellini, C., & Vescovi, P. (2006). A GIS-based automated procedure for landslide susceptibility mapping by the conditional analysis method: The Baganza valley case study (Italian Northern Apennines). Environmental Geology, 50, 941–961.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0264-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kitutu, M. G., Muwanga, A., Poesen, J., & Deckers, J. A. (2009). Influence of soil properties on landslide occurrences in Bududa district, Eastern Uganda. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(7), 611–620.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Farrokhnia, A., Pirasteh, S., Pradhan, B., Pourkermani, M., & Arian, M. (2010). A recent scenario of mass wasting and its impact on the transportation on Albroz mountains, Iran using geo-information technology. Arabian Journal of Geosciences.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0238-7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Spatial Information Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surveying and Land StudiesPapua New Guinea University of TechnologyLaePapua New Guinea

Personalised recommendations