A comparison of the South African and Indonesian teachers preferred curriculum ideology for school science
South Africa and Indonesia are currently implementing revised school curricula, which are informed by various socio-scientific, political, and economic imperatives related to global educational reform. Teacher preparedness to implement these curriculum reforms could be affected by their teaching philosophies and preferred curriculum ideologies. The present research sought to determine curriculum ideologies preferred by Indonesian and South African teachers, as a preliminary investigation into teachers’ beliefs about the role of education in different teaching and learning contexts. The research question underlying this non-experimental comparative quantitative research asked: How do South African and Indonesian teachers’ preferred curriculum ideology for school science compare? Data were collected using a previously validated questionnaire from purposively selected science teachers from the two countries. Results indicate that the majority of teachers in both countries generally prefer the student-centered curriculum ideology for school science. Differences were observed between teachers concerning specific aspects of school science. It is concluded that teachers have specific preferred ideologies for school science; however, there are local context-specific factors that inform the preferred ideologies among teachers. Further research is required to determine the impact of the preferred ideologies on teaching and learning and curriculum implementation.
KeywordsCurriculum ideologies School science Teachers
The researchers would like to thank all the teachers who participated in the research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The research was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Alanazi, S. (2016). Comparison for curriculum ideologies. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 1–110.Google Scholar
- Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106–107.Google Scholar
- Browne, M. (2018). Development of one’s teaching philosophy: the three “R’s” of relationships, relevancy, and rigor. Empowering Research for Educators, 2, 1), 1–1), 7.Google Scholar
- Bustin, R. (2018). What’s your view? Curriculum ideologies and their impact in the geography classroom. Teaching Geography, 43(2), 61–63.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). California: Sage publications.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597–604.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.Google Scholar
- Department of Basic Education. (2011). Life sciences curriculum and assessment policy statement grade 10–12. Retrieved from www.thutong.doe.gov.za.
- Department of Basic Education. (2018). Education statistics in South Africa 2016. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Publications/Education%20Statistic%20SA%202016.pdf?ver=2018-11-01-095102-947. Accessed 26 Jan 2019.
- Faryadi, Q. (2015). Teaching philosophy statements. Online Submission, 5(6), 61–66.Google Scholar
- Gunawan, I. (2017). Indonesian curriculum 2013: instructional management, obstacles faced by teachers in implementation, and the way forward. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 128, 56–63.Google Scholar
- Hodson, D. (2004). Going beyond STS: towards a curriculum for socio-political action. The Science Education Review, 3(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
- Lee, J. C. K., & Yin, H. B. (2005). Teacher receptivity to and concerns about curriculum change: an exploration of research on curriculum implementation. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 1(1), 107–128.Google Scholar
- Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.Google Scholar
- Mäkinen, M. (2018). Curriculum ideologies reflecting pre-service teachers’ stances toward inclusive education. Contemporary Pedagogies in Teacher Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76326.
- Ornstein, A.C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues. 4thed. New York: PearsonGoogle Scholar
- Posner, G. J. (2003). Analyzing the curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Putra, K. A. (2014). The implication of curriculum renewal on ELT in Indonesia. Parole, 4(1), 63–75.Google Scholar
- Sayed, Y. (2004). The case of teacher education in post-apartheid South Africa: politics and priorities. In L. Chisholm (Ed.), Changing class: education and social change in post-apartheid South Africa (pp. 247–265). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
- Schiro, M. S. (2008). Curriculum theory: conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Schiro, M. S. (2013). Curriculum theory: conflicting visions and enduring concerns (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Schwab, K. (2016). The global competitiveness report 2016–2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2017-2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017–2018.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2019.
- UN Development Programme. (n.d.). Goal 4: quality education. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goal-4-quality-education.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2019.
- Welch, W. W., & Lawrenz, F. (1982). Characteristics of male and female science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(7), 587–594.Google Scholar
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar