Curriculum Perspectives

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 81–84 | Cite as

Understanding curriculum? Notes towards a conceptual basis for curriculum inquiry

Point and counterpoint
  • 36 Downloads

References

  1. Bernstein, B. (1990). Vertical and horizontal discourse: an essay. In Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique (pp. 155–174). London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Deng, Z. (2017). Rethinking curriculum and teaching. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 1–25). Oxford Online Publication Date: May 2017: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.55.Google Scholar
  3. du Preez, P., & Simmonds, S. (2014). Curriculum, curriculum development, curriculum studies? Problematising theoretical ambiguities in doctoral theses in the education field. South African Journal of Education, 34(2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gough, N. (2003). Introduction: narrative experiments as curriculum inquiry. In Intertextual Turns in Curriculum Inquiry: Fictions, Diffractions and Deconstructions. unpublished PhD dissertation, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia, pp 1–32.Google Scholar
  5. Green, B. (2018). Engaging curriculum: bridging the curriculum theory and English education divide. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Green, B., & Hopwood, N. (2015). The body in professional practice, learning and education: a question of corporeality. In B. Green & N. Hopwood (Eds.), The body in professional practice, learning and education: body/practice (pp. 15–33). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Green, B., Reid, J., & Brennan, M. (2017). Challenging policy, rethinking practice; or, struggling for the soul of teacher education. In T. A. Trippestad, A. Swennen, & T. Werler (Eds.), The struggle for teacher education: international perspectives on teacher education governance and reforms (pp. 39–55). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  8. Green, W. (2003). Curriculum inquiry in Australia: Toward a local genealogy of the curriculum field. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International Handbook of Curriculum Research (7 ed., pp. 123–141). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Musgrave, P. (1979). Society and the curriculum in Australia. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. O’Connor, K., & Yates, L. (2010). Classifying curriculum scholarship in Australia: a review of postgraduate theses 1975–2005. Aust Educ Res, 37(1), 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pinar, W. F. (2007). Introduction, in Intellectual advancement through disciplinarity: verticality and horizontality in curriculum studies (pp. xi–xxxv). Dordrecht: Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Pinar, W. F. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, D., & Ewing, R. (2002). Curriculum studies. Change: Transformations in Education, 5(1), 21–45.Google Scholar
  15. Westbury, I. (2005). Reconsidering Schwab’s ‘Practicals’: a response to Peter Hlebowitsh’s ‘Generational ideas in curriculum: a historical triangulation'. Curric Inq, 35(1), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Curriculum Studies Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia

Personalised recommendations