Advertisement

Toward a General Theory of Societal Collapse: A Biophysical Examination of Tainter’s Model of the Diminishing Returns of Complexity

  • Ugo Bardi
  • Sara FalsiniEmail author
  • Ilaria Perissi
Original Paper

Abstract

The collapse of large social systems, often referred to as “civilizations” or “empires,” is a well-known historical phenomenon, but its origins are the object of an unresolved debate. In this paper, we present a simple biophysical model which we link to the concept that societies collapse because of the “diminishing returns of complexity” proposed by Tainter (The collapse of complex societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988). Our model is based on the description of a socio-economic system as a trophic chain of energy stocks which dissipate the energy potential of the available resources. The model is based on the idea that we observe that the exploitation of a non-renewable resource stock (“production”) has a strongly nonlinear relation with the complexity of the system, assumed to be proportional to the size of the stock termed “The Economy” (or “capital”), producing various trajectories of decline of the economy, in some cases rapid enough that they can be defined as “collapses.” The evolution of the relation of production and the economy produces a curve similar to the one proposed by Tainter, for the decline of a complex society.

Keywords

Tainter’s theory Societal collapse System dynamics Complexity 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bardi U (2013) Mind sized world models. Sustainability 5:896–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardi U (2017) The Seneca effect why growth is slow but collapse is rapid. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardi U, Lavacchi A (2009) A simple interpretation of Hubbert’s model of resource exploitation. Energies 2:646–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bury JB (1923) History of the later Roman Empire. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai J, Leung PS (2017) Short-term projection of global fish demand and supply gaps. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 601. Rome, p. 607Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter G, Kleinjans R, Villasante S, O’Leary BC (2016) Landing the blame: the influence of EU member states on quota setting. Mar Policy 64:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Catton W (1982) Overshoot, the ecological basis of revolutionary change. Illini Books, Champaign (ISBN 0-252-00988-6) Google Scholar
  8. Cline EH (2014) 1177 B.C.: the year civilization collapsed. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demandt A (1984) Der Fall Roms. Beck, MunchenGoogle Scholar
  10. Diamond J (2005) Collapse societies choose to fail or succeed. Penguin Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Edmondson JC (1989) Mining in the later Roman Empire and beyond: continuity or disruption? J Rom Stud 79:84–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forrester J (1971) World dynamics. Wright-Allen Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibbon E (1783) History of the decline and fall of the Roman empire. Strahan and Cadell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Gladwell M (2002) The tipping point: how little things can make a big difference: Malcolm. Back Bay Books, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta AK, Hall CAS (2011) A review of the past and current state of EROI data. Sustainability 3:1796–1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lotka AJ (1925) Elements of physical biology. Williams Wilkins Company, Philadelphia.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.15.9.812-b CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. McConnell JR, Wilson AI, Stohl A, Arienzo MM, Chellman NJ, Eckhardt S, Thompson EM, Pollard AM, Steffensen JP (2018) Lead pollution recorded in Greenland ice indicates European emissions tracked plagues, wars, and imperial expansion during antiquity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:5726–5731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meadows D, Meadows DHM, Randers J, Behrensh WW III (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Mobus GE, Kalton MC (2015) Principles of system science. Springer, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-I-4939-1920-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Motesharrei S, Rivas J, Kalnay E (2014) Human and nature dynamics (HANDY): modeling inequality and use of resources in the collapse or sustainability of societies. Ecol Econ 101:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Odum HT (1973) Energy, ecology, and economics. Ambio 2:220–227Google Scholar
  22. Pauly D, Zeller D (2016) Catch reconstructions reveal that global marine fisheries catches are higher than reported and declining. Nat Commun 7:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pearl J, Mackenzie D (2018) The book of why: the new science of cause and effect. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Perissi I, Bardi U, Bardi U, El Asmar T (2017) Dynamic patterns of overexploitation in fisheries. Ecol Model 359:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reynolds DB (2016) Cold war energy: the rise and fall of the Soviet Union. Alaska Chena LLC, Anchorage, AlaskaGoogle Scholar
  26. Richardson G (2013) System dynamics. In: Encyclopedia of operations research and management 1519–1522. Springer, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1153-7_1030
  27. Sverdrup HU, Koca D, Rganarsdottir KV (2012) Peak metals, minerals, energy, wealth, food and population: urgent policy considerations for a sustainable society. J Environ Sci Eng B 1:499–533Google Scholar
  28. Sverdrup HU, Koca D, Ragnarsdóttir KV (2013) Peak metals, minerals, energy, wealth, food and population: urgent policy considerations for a sustainable society. J Environ Sci Eng 2:189–222Google Scholar
  29. Taagepera R (1979) Size and duration of empires: growth-decline curves, 600 BC to 600 AD. Soc Sci Hist 3:115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tainter JA (1988) The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Tainter JA (1996) Complexity, problem solving, and sustainable societies. Getting down to earth: practical applications of ecological economics. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Tainter JA (2006) Social complexity and sustainability. Ecol Complex 3:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tainter JA (2008) Collapse sustainability, and the environment: how authors choose to fail or succeed. Rev Anthropol 37:342–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Volterra V (1926) Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118:558–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Watson RA, Cheung WWL, Anticamara JA, Rashid US, Zeller D, Pauly D (2013) Global marine yield halved as fishing intensity redoubles. Fish Fish 14:493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zeller D, Cashion T, Palomares M, Pauly D (2018) Global marine fisheries discards: a synthesis of reconstructed data. Fish Fish 19:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry DepartmentUniversity of FlorenceSesto FiorentinoItaly
  2. 2.Chemistry DepartmentConsorzio Interuniversitario per la Scienza e la Tecnolgia dei Materiali (INSTM)-University of FlorenceSesto FiorentinoItaly

Personalised recommendations