Using the discontinuation rule to reduce the effect of random guessing on parameter estimation in the item response theory
The discontinuation rule is often used to reduce the effect of random guessing in psychological tests. It may also play the similar role in the item response theory. In this article, a Monte Carlo study was implemented to explore the feasibility of the four- and six-consecutive-zero discontinuation rules to reduce the effect of random guessing on parameter estimation in the Rasch model. The results showed that random guessing inflated estimation errors, and these discontinuation rules can reduce this effect on item-parameter estimation under the joint and marginal maximum likelihood, but can do so only for person-parameter estimation under the marginal maximum likelihood and expected a posteriori methods.
KeywordsDiscontinuation rules Maximum likelihood The Rasch model
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Birnbaum A (1968) Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In: Lord FM, Novick MR (eds) Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
- De Ayala RJ (2006) Estimating person measures from partial credit responses containing missing data. J Appl Meas 7:278–291Google Scholar
- Gershon R (1992) Guessing and measurement. Rasch Meas Trans 6:209–210Google Scholar
- Linacre JM (1994) Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans 7:328Google Scholar
- Linacre JM (2008) A user’s guide to WINSTEPS-MINISTEP: Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago, IL. https://www.winsteps.com
- Rasch G (1960) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- Riverside Publishing Company (2003) Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th edn. Itasca, ILGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute (2013) SAS/STAT® 9.4 [Computer program]. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
- Wechsler D (2014) Wechsler intelligence scale for children, 5th edn. NCS Pearson, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- Wright BD, Stone MH (1979) Best test design. Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics, and Assessment Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar