China Foundry

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 352–357 | Cite as

Weibull analysis of fluidity and hardness of ultrasonically degassed secondary Al7Si0.3Mg aluminum alloy

  • Çağlar YükselEmail author
Overseas Foundry


The influence of ultrasonic degassing process on fluidity and hardness of secondary Al7Si0.3Mg alloy castings was studied by Weibull analysis. This work makes a contribution about fluidity and hardness distribution of secondary aluminum alloys with ultrasonic degassing phenomena using a two-parameter form of Weibull analysis. Results show that both hardness and fluidity of alloy are improved after the ultrasonic degassing process. Average efficiency of ultrasonic degassing on fluidity measurements is 31.71%, whereas on hardness values is 8.48%. The Brinell hardness of 45.7 and fluidity of 19.5 of Weibull modulus were achieved as the most reliable and reproducible after 45 s ultrasonic degassing process against 15 s and 30 s ultrasonic degassing processes. The value of 70.08 HB is obtained from ultrosonic degassing, which is equivalent to sand casting of primary Al7Si0.3Mg aluminum alloy, and the highest value of 56.4 cm for 45 s after ultrasonic degassing of fluidity was measured.

Key words

Weibull analysis Weibull modulus ultrasonic degassing fluidity hardness aluminum 

CLC numbers




  1. [1]
    Campbell J. Complete casting handbook: metal casting processes, metallurgy, techniques and design. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Dong S, Wang W, Shi Z, et al. Effects of Ultrasonic Stirring on Microstructures of Al-7wt% Si Alloy Ingot. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1074, No. 1, p. 012026). 2018, IOP Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Moussa M E, Waly M A, El-Sheikh A M. Effect of high-intensity ultrasonic treatment on microstructure, hardness and wear behaviour of the hypereutectic Mg-5Si alloy. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 143, No. 1, p. 012037). 2016, IOP Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Srivastava N, Gupta R, Chaudhari G P. Effect of high-power ultrasound on mechanical properties of Al-Si alloys. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 330, No. 1, p. 012023). 2018, IOP Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Colak M, Kayikci R, Dispinar D. Influence of different cross sections on fluidity characteristics of A356. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2015, 68(2): 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kwon Y D, Lee Z H. The effect of grain refining and oxide inclusion on the fluidity of Al-4.5 Cu-0.6 Mn and A356 alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2003, 360(1–2): 372–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Davami P, Kim S K, Tiryakioğlu M. The effect of melt quality and filtering on the Weibull distributions of tensile properties in Al-7% Si-Mg alloy castings. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2013, 579: 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Eskin G I. Cavitation mechanism of ultrasonic melt degassing. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 1995, 2(2): S137–S141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Eskin G I. Ultrasonic Treatment of Molten Aluminium, 2nd Ed. Metallurgiya, Moscow, USSR, 1988.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of applied mechanics, 1951, 103(730): 293–297.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Tan E, Tarakcilar A R, Dispina D. The effect of melt quality and quenching temperature on the Weibull distribution of tensile properties in aluminum alloys. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 2015, 46(10): 1005–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Dispinar D, Akhtar S, Nordmark A, et al. Degassing, hydrogen and porosity phenomena in A356. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2010, 527(16–17): 3719–3725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Tunçay T, Bayoğlu S. The Effect of Iron Content on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of A356 Cast Alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2017, 48(2): 794–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Dispinar D, Campbell J. Use of bifilm index as an assessment of liquid metal quality. International Journal of Cast Metals Research, 2006, 19(1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Uludağ M, Çetin R, Gemi L, et al. Change in Porosity of A356 by Holding Time and Its Effect on Mechanical Properties. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2018, 27(10): 5141–5151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Zahedi H, Emamy M, Razaghian A, et al. The effect of Fe-rich intermetallics on the Weibull distribution of tensile properties in a cast Al-5 pct Si-3 pct Cu-1 pct Fe-0.3 pct Mg alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2007, 38(3): 659–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Dai X, Yang X, Campbell J, et al. Effects of runner system design on the mechanical strength of Al-7Si-Mg alloy castings. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2003, 354(1–2): 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Shevidi A H, Taghiabadi R, Razaghian A. Weibull analysis of effect of T6 heat treatment on fracture strength of AM60B magnesium alloy. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2018, 28(1): 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Huisman W, Graule T, Gaucklerl J. Alumina of high reliability by centrifugal casting. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 1995, 15(9): 811–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Green N R, Campbell J. Statistical distributions of fracture strengths of cast Al-7Si-Mg alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 1993, 173(1–2): 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Hudak D, Tiryakioğlu M. On comparing the shape parameters of two Weibull distributions. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2011, 528(27): 8028–8030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Hazen A. Water supply. American civil engineers handbook, 1930: 1444–1518.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Filliben J J. The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality. Technometrics, 975, 17 (1): 111–117.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Balaba W M, Stevenson L T, Wefers K, et al. Probability estimators for Weibull statistics of the failure strengths of brittle powder compacts. Journal of materials science letters, 1990, 9(6): 648–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Kirtay S, Dispinar D. Effect of ranking selection on the Weibull modulus estimation. Gazi University Journal of Science, 2012, 25(1): 175–187.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Barbosa J, Puga H. Ultrasonic melt processing in the low-pressure investment casting of Al alloys. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2017, 244: 150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Yüksel Ç, Öztürk M C, Balcı Y B, et al. Ultrasonik GazGiderme Yöntemiile Metal KalitesininArtirilmasi. Technological Applied Sciences, 2017, 13(2): 172–179. (In Turkish).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    El-Aziz A M, El-Hady M A, Khlifa W. Effect of High Intensity Ultrasonic Treatment on the Microstructure, Corrosion and Mechanical Behaviour of AC7A Aluminum Alloy. Light Metals, 2016: 721–724.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Campbell J. Castings. Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier, 2003.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Puga H, Barbosa J, Tuan N Q, et al. Effect of ultrasonic degassing on performance of Al-based components. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2014, 24(11): 3459–3464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Yu S, Feng H, Li Y. A novel method for preparing Al matrix surface composites. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2008, 457(1–2): 404–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Tiryakioğlu M, Yousefian P, Eason P D. Quantification of Entrainment Damage in A356 Aluminum Alloy Castings. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2018, 49(11): 5815–5822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Cox M, Harding R A. Influence of tilt filling on Weibull modulus of 2L99 aluminium investment castings. Materials science and technology, 2007, 23(2): 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Foundry Journal Agency and Springer Singapore 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringAtatürk UniversityErzurumTurkey

Personalised recommendations