Advertisement

China Foundry

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 118–125 | Cite as

Microstructure and properties of ductile iron bars for plunger pump prepared by horizontal continuous casting process

  • Chun-jie XuEmail author
  • Zhen Zhao
  • Yu Lei
  • Yong-hui Liu
  • Zhong-ming Zhang
  • Yan Li
  • Dan Shechtman
Research & Development
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Ductile iron bars (DIBs) with a diameter of 145 mm, used for plunger pump production, were made by the horizontal continuous casting (HCC). The microstructure of the samples cut at three locations with different distances away from the surface (∼20 mm from the surface, half of the radius and the center of the HCCDIBs) were investigated. The mechanical properties were measured by tensile and torsion tests. Results show that after the spheroidization of graphite, the iron matrix incorporates the nodules of Format I, Size 8 close to the surface, Format I, Size 7 at the half of the radius from the surface, and Format II, Size 6 in the centre of the bar, according to the ASTM A247 standard. The content of pearlite in the matrix changes from 55% (∼20 mm from the surface) to 70% (half of the radius) and 80% (the center of the HCCDIBs). The strengths in tension are 552, 607 and 486 MPa with the elongations of 12.5%, 10.5% and 5.8% in samples cut at these three locations from the surface to the centre, respectively. The strength in torsion is equal to 558, 551 and 471 MPa at corresponding torsion angles of 418°, 384° and 144° respectively to the same distance from the bar surface. Fracture in tension is manifested via crack propagation through the interface between graphite nodules and matrix (Mode I), while in torsion the fracture is caused by the shear of graphite nodules (Mode II). It is shown that the transition between two fracture modes is also dependent on the size of graphite nodule. Typically, fracture Mode I was observed for nodules of smaller diameter (less than 22.7 µm) and fracture Mode II was seen for nodules of greater diameter (more than 24.8 µm).

Key words

horizontal continuous casting ductile iron bars plunger pump tension and torsion properties microstructure 

CLC numbers

TG143.5 

Document code

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Achievement Transfer and Promotion Plan-absorb Achievement Transformation Project (No. 2017CGZH-XNGJ-03), Shaanxi Provincial Education Department Scientific Research Program Project-service Local Special Industrialization Cultivation Project (No. 17JF018), Xi’an Science and Technology Planning Project Science and Technology Innovation Guide Projects (No. 201805037YD15CG21(19)) and Xi’an University of Technology Scientific and Technological Achievement Transformation Project-technical Requirement Solving Project of Enterprises (No. 2018-1).

References

  1. [1]
    Wu Huaichao, He Yongyong, Wang Zhangjun, et al. Study on hydraulic system for performance test of the slipper pair in high pressure axial piston pump. Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2015, 15(1): 8–10. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Shin J H, Kim K W. Effect of surface non-flatness on the lubrication characteristics in the valve part of a swash-plate type axial piston pump. Meccanica, 2014, 49(5): 1275–1295.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Li Juan, Yang Hongzhi, Han Mei, et al. Application and design of plunger pump lifting viscoelastic fluid. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 291–294: 2507–2511.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Xu Chunjie, Xu Xinfeng, Zhao Zhen, et al. Horizontal continuous casting technology of cast iron and application of dense bars. Foundry Technology. 2017, 38(11): 2559–2564. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Xu Chunjie, Guo Quanfen, Zhang Ting, et al. Effect on the microstructure and properties of HCC gray iron bars with normalizing treatment. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment. 2017, 38(4): 146–151. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Xu Chunjie, Dai Pan, Zhang Zhengyang, et al. Effect of austempering parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of HCC ductile iron dense bars. China Foundry, 2015, 12(2): 104–110.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Meng Lingnan, Xu Chunjie, Zhang Zhongming. Flow behavior of liquid iron in horizontal continuous mould and its effects on mechanical properties of cast iron. Special Casting & Nonferrous Alloys. 2010, 30(10): 932–934. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Xu Chunjie, Zhang Zhengyang, Meng Lingnan, et al. Effects of Cu and Mo on microstructure and mechanical properties of horizontal continuous cast ductile iron profiles. Special Casting & Nonferrous Alloys. 2011, 31(6): 407–409. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Wang Jincheng, Li Weiming, Zhang Zhongming, et al. Effect of austempering processing parameters on microstructure and hardness of nodular cast iron dense bar. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment. 2013, 33(1): 70–75. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Xu Chunjie, Feng Gangwen, Zhang Ting, et al. Microstructure and properties of high strength hcc gray iron bars with large diameter 220 mm. Foundry Technology. 2016, 37(11): 2309–2317. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Pongsak C, Panya S. Continuously cast ductile iron: Processing, structures, and properties. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2011, 211(8): 1372–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Zheng Liang. Effect of Solidification Cooling Rate on Microstructure of Cast Nickel Base Superalloy K417G[J]. Journal of Aeronautical Materials, 2006, 26(3): 7–11. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Chen Xiaofeng, Guo Dazhan, Lu Wenhua, et al. The fracture toughness of shaped ferritic ductile iron by horizontal continuous cast. Foundry, 1991, 39(5): 9–13. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Ghahremaninezhad A, Ravi-Chandar K. Deformation and failure in nodular cast iron. Acta Materialia, 2012, 60(5): 2359–2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Marino B, Mudry F, Pineau A. Experimental study of cavity growth in ductile rupture. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1985, 22(6): 989–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Shi Junping, Han Dong, Tang Anmin. The Fracture Analysis of Ductile Iron Fracture Test under Complex Stress Condition. Journal of Xi’an University of Technology, 2009, 25(3): 288–291. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Hao Shijin, Song Xuding. Ductile Cast Iron. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2015: 47–50. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Hütter G, Zybell L, Kuna M. Micromechanisms of fracture in nodular cast iron: From experimental findings towards modeling strategies — A review[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2015, 144(12): 118–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Foundry Journal Agency and Springer Singapore 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chun-jie Xu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Zhen Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yu Lei
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yong-hui Liu
    • 3
  • Zhong-ming Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yan Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dan Shechtman
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringXi’an University of TechnologyXi’anChina
  2. 2.Xi’an Shechtman Nobel Prize New Materials InstituteXi’anChina
  3. 3.Shaanxi Huaan Continuous Casting Co., Ltd.Xi’anChina
  4. 4.Faculty of Materials Science and EngineeringTechnion-Israel Insititue of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations