Advertisement

Modeling of the stormwater runoff quantity and quality in Amman-Zarqua Basin, Jordan

  • Othman Al-MashaqbehEmail author
  • Malek Shorman
Original Paper
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

The Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) was applied to simulate stormwater runoff quantity and quality generated from different land uses at Amman-Zarqa Basin (AZB) over two winter seasons (October 25, 2012 to May 31, 2014). The model was calibrated and validated using several storm events over two winter seasons for a measured surface flow data at the inlet of King Talal Dam (KTD). The calibration and validation results showed good agreement between simulated and measured surface runoff flow data at AZB. The results showed that the total precipitation estimated by the model is about 1106 MCM during the study period. About 93.2% of precipitation (1031 MCM) is lost by infiltration and evaporation and 6.8% (75 MCM) is generated as runoff in AZB. The total predicted surface flow by the model was about 207 MCM compared with a measured value of 213 MCM in the basin. It is noticed that the contribution of surface runoff flow is about 36% of the total storage of KTD during the study period. Based on the results of this preliminary modeling study, pollutant loads (BOD5, COD, and TSS) carried by stormwater runoff were much higher than those by treated wastewater over the study period. The SWMM is a very effective model and has successfully modeled both hydraulic and pollutant loads generated from Amman-Zarqa Basin.

Keywords

Rainfall-runoff simulations Stormwater modeling Pollutant loads SWMM 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Jordan Scientific Research Fund (SRSF) (Grant no. EWE/1/08/2011)/Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research provided full support for this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abu Hilal AH, Abu Alhaija MM (2010) Nutrients in water and sediments of King Talal Dam-Jordan. Jordan J Biol Sci 3(3):87–100Google Scholar
  2. Al Kuisi M, Al-Qinna M, Margane A, Aljazzar T (2012) Spatial assessment of salinity and nitrate pollution in Amman-Zarqa Basin: a case study. Environ Earth Sci 59(1):117–129.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0010-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Mahamid J (2005) Integration of water resources of the upper aquifer in Amman-Zarqa basin based on mathematical modeling and GIS, Jordan. Freib Online Geol 12:223Google Scholar
  4. Al-Afayfeh N, Al-bakri J, Naber S, Shammout M, Shatanawi M (2006) Optimization for sustainable water resource management. Environmental Software and Services GMBH AustriaGoogle Scholar
  5. Alawi A, Haddadin M (2004) Dead populations of fish in the rivers Jordan and Zarqa. Biol Conserv 6(3):215–216Google Scholar
  6. Al-Jassabi S, Khalil AM (2006) Initial report on identification and toxicity of microcystis in King Talal Reservoir, Jordan. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 11(2):125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Kharabsheh A (1999) Ground-water quality deterioration in arid areas: a case study of the Zerqa River basin as influenced by Khirbet Es-Samra wastewater (Jordan). J Arid Environ 34:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Al-Mashaqbeh O, Jiries A, El-HajAli Z (2014) Stormwater runoff quality generated from an urban and a rural area in Amman-Zarqa basin. Published in water pollution XII. ISSN 1743-3541, Print ISBN 978-1-84564-776-6Google Scholar
  9. Al-Mashaqbeh O, Jiries A, El-HajAli Z (2015) Characterization of stormwater runoff generated from urban areas in Amman City/Jordan. In: Proceeding of 7th conference on scientific research in Jordan, Amman 14th November 2015Google Scholar
  10. Alqadi K, Kumar L (2011) Water issues in the Kingdom of Jordan. A brief review with reasons of declining quality. J Food Agric Environ 9(3–4):1019–1023Google Scholar
  11. Al-Rawabdeh A, Al-Ansari N, Al-Taani A, Al-Khateeb F, Knutsson S (2014) Modeling the risk of groundwater contamination using modified DRASTIC and GIS in Amman-Zerqa Basin. Cent Eur J Eng 4(3):264–280Google Scholar
  12. Anderson NJ (1997) Modelling the sustainable yield of groundwater resource in riverbed aquifers in arid and semi-arid areas. MPhil to PhD Transfer Report. Department of Civil Engineering, University of London. London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  13. Arnold C, Gibbons J (1996) Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. J Am Plan Assoc 62(2):243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cawley AM, Cunnane C (2003) Comment on estimation of greenfield runoff rate. In: Proceedings of the Irish National Hydrology Seminar, Tullamore, Ireland, November, 29–43Google Scholar
  15. Department of Statistics (DOS) (2013) Jordan statistical yearbook. Department of Statistics, Amman, JordanGoogle Scholar
  16. Fandi K, Qudsieh I, Mubibi S, Massadeh M (2009) Water pollution assessment of King Talal Dam. Adv Environ Biol 3(1):92–100Google Scholar
  17. FAO (1991) Water harvesting: a manual for the design and construction of water harvesting schemes for plant production. AGL/MISC/17/91. FAO. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  18. Haan CT, Barfield BJ, Hayes JC (1994) Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  19. Hadadin NA (2015) Dams in Jordan current and future perspective. Can J Pure Appl Sci 9(1):3279–3290 (ISSN: 1920-3853; Print ISSN: 1715-9997) Google Scholar
  20. Hadadin NA, Tarawneh ZS (2007) Environmental issues in Jordan, solutions and recommendations. Am J Environ Sci 3(1):30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hammouri N, El-Naqa A (2007) Drought assessment using GIS and remote sensing in Amman-Zarqa Basin, Jordan. Jordan J Civ Eng 1(2):142–152Google Scholar
  22. JVA, Jordan Valley Authority (2014) Annual reports, Dams DirectorateGoogle Scholar
  23. Krebs G, Kokkonen T, Valtanen M, Setälä H, Koivusalo H (2014) Spatial resolution considerations for urban hydrological modelling. J Hydrol 512:482–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rossman LA (2010) Storm water management model user’s manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  27. Salamah E (1980) Hydrogeology and hydrochemistry in catchments area of King Talal Reservoir (Jordan). Z dt Geol Ges Hann 131:319–338Google Scholar
  28. Shatanawi M, Fayyad M (1996) Effect of Khirbet As-Samra treated effluent on the quality of irrigation water in the Central Jordan Valley. Water Res 30:2915–2920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tan SBK, Chua LHC, Shuy EB, Lo EY, Lim LW (2008) Performances of rainfall-runoff models calibrated over single and continuous storm flow events. J Hydrol Eng 13(7):597–607.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:7(597)) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2007) Stormwater management model user’s manual. Version 5.0Google Scholar
  31. US EPA (2015) Stormwater homepage. http://www.epa.gov/npdes/npdes-stormwater-program. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  32. Warwick JJ, Tadepalli P (1991) Efficacy of SWMM application. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 117(3):352–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Water Authority Jordan, WAJ (2002) Jordan climatological handbook. Annual reports, Water Authority JordanGoogle Scholar
  34. Water Authority Jordan, WAJ (2012) Wastewater sector annual report for the year 2011—Department of Wastewater Systems and Water Reuse and Environment Unit. Water Authority JordanGoogle Scholar
  35. Yahya T, Zaatera M, Khatera D (2017) Semi-volatile organic pollutants in Jordanian surface water. Arab J Chem 10:3318–3323Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Water and Environment CentreRoyal Scientific SocietyAmmanJordan
  2. 2.KEO International ConsultantsKuwaitKuwait

Personalised recommendations