Advertisement

Kinetic investigation and optimization of a sequencing batch reactor for the treatment of textile wastewater

  • Desta SolomonEmail author
  • Zebene Kiflie
  • Stijn Van Hulle
Original Paper
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Discharging of untreated or partially treated textile wastewater is common in Ethiopia, and this has detrimental effect to the environment. It is difficult to treat textile wastewater by conventional biological processes. In this study, real textile wastewater was taken and treated using sequencing batch reactor using a biomass taken from domestic wastewater treatment plant. Cycle period, air flowrate and sludge retention time (SRT) were initially optimized using the response surface methodology. The optimum ratio of cycle period/air flowrate/SRT which gives a 57% COD removal and 54% color removal was found to be 25 h/15 L/h/16 day. Using two types of wastewater substrate concentrations and various hydraulic retention times at optimized condition, COD removal, color removal, sludge volume index (SVI) and mixed liquor suspended solid were measured. The maximum of COD removal (73%) and color removal (65.8%) was obtained at an organic loading rate of 0.078 kg COD/m3 day. SVI at the optimized condition was found to be 90–92 mL/g. Finally, a first-order kinetic model was used to represent the degradation of textile wastewater.

Keywords

Textile wastewater Sequencing batch reactor Organic loading rate Sludge volume index Color removal Chemical oxygen demand removal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

First, we would like to thank NORAD project of Hawaasa University for the financial support. Finally, the authors would like to acknowledge laboratory workers of Addis Ababa Institute of Technology, Addis Ababa University, for providing the necessary laboratory facility.

Compliance with ethical standard

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Daud NK, Akpan UG, Hameed BH (2011) Decolorization of sunzol black DN conc. in aqueous solution by Fenton oxidation process, effect of system parameters and kinetic study. Desalin Water Treat 3994:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2012.1213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hayat H, Mahmood Q, Pervez A et al (2015) Comparative decolorization of dyes in textile wastewater using biological and chemical treatment. Sep Purif Technol 154:149–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellouze E, Tahri N, Ben Amar R (2012) Enhancement of textile wastewater treatment process using Nanofiltration. Desalination 286:16–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fersi C, Dhahbi M (2008) Treatment of textile plant effluent by ultrafiltration and/or nanofiltration for water reuse. Desalination 222:263–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke EA, Anliker R (1980) Organic dyes and pigments. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Puvaneswari N, Muthukrishnan J, Gunasekaran P (2006) Toxicity assessment and microbial degradation of azo dyes. IJEB 1009:618–626Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chung K, Fulk GE, Egan M (1978) Reduction of Azo dyes by intestinal anaerobes. Appl Environ Microbiol 35:558–562Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shi B, Li G, Wang D et al (2007) Removal of direct dyes by coagulation: the performance of preformed polymeric aluminum species. J Hazard Mater 143:567–574.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rajeshkannan R, Rajasimman M, Rajamohan N (2010) Optimization, equilibrium and kinetics studies on sorption of Acid Blue 9 using brown marine algae Turbinaria conoides. Biodegradation 21:713–727.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-010-9337-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verma P, Madamwar D (2003) Decolourization of synthetic dyes by a newly isolated strain of Serratia marcescens. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:615–618.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025115801331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh M, Srivastava RK (2011) Sequencing batch reactor technology for biological wastewater treatment: a review. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 199–203.  https://doi.org/10.1002/apj
  12. 12.
    Oliveira RP, Ghilardi JA, Ratusznei SM et al (2008) Anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor applied to automobile industry wastewater treatment: volumetric loading rate and feed strategy effects. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 47:1374–1383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mohan SV, Rao NC, Prasad KK et al (2005) Treatment of complex chemical wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) with an aerobic suspended growth configuration. Process Biochem 40:1501–1508.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2003.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsang YF, Hua FL, Chua H et al (2007) Optimization of biological treatment of paper mill effluent in a sequencing batch reactor. Biochem Eng J 34:193–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2006.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodrigues CSD, Madeira LM, Boaventura RAR (2014) Synthetic textile dyeing wastewater treatment by integration of advanced oxidation and biological processes—performance analysis with costs reduction. 2:1027–1039Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ng WJ, Sim TS, Ong SL et al (1993) Efficiency of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) in the removal of selected microorganisms from domestic sewage. Water Res 27:1591–1600.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(93)90105-Q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Metcalf & Eddy (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ersu CB, Arslankaya E (2006) Biological nutrient removal in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Sci Technol 33:29–38Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Su J, Kung C, Lin J et al (1997) Utilization of sequencing batch reactor for in situ piggery wastewater treatment. J Environ Sci Heal Part A 32:391–405Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morling S (2010) Nitrogen removal and heavy metals in leachate treatment using SBR technology. J Hazard Mater 174:679–686.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klimiuk E, Kulikowska D (2004) Effectiveness of organics and nitrogen removal from municipal landfill leachate in single- and two-stage SBR systems. Polish J Environ Stud 13:525–532Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sirianuntapiboon S, Sadahiro O, Salee P (2007) Some properties of a granular activated carbon-sequencing batch reactor (GAC-SBR) system for treatment of textile wastewater containing direct dyes. J Environ Manage 85:162–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sirianuntapiboon S, Chairattanawan K, Jungphungsukpanich S (2006) Some properties of a sequencing batch reactor system for removal of vat dyes. Bioresour Technol 97:1243–1252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abu-ghunmi LN, Jamrah AI (2006) Biological treatment of textile wastewater using sequencing batch reactor technology. Environ Model Assess 11:333–343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-005-9025-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fu LY, Wen XH, Yi Qian QLL (2001) Treatment of dyeing wastewater in two SBR systems. Process Biochem 36:1111–1118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00143-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lourenco ND, Novais JM, Pinheiro HM (2000) Reactive textile dye colour removal in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Sci Technol 42:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khouni I, Marrot B, Ben R (2012) Treatment of reconstituted textile wastewater containing a reactive dye in an aerobic sequencing batch reactor using a novel bacterial consortium. Sep Purif Technol 87:110–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moghaddam SS, Moghaddam MRA, Arami M (2010) Coagulation/flocculation process for dye removal using sludge from water treatment plant: optimization through response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 175:651–657.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhu X, Tian J, Liu R, Chen L (2011) Optimization of Fenton and electro-Fenton oxidation of biologically treated coking wastewater using response surface methodology. Sep Purif Technol 81:444–450.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xu H, Qi S, Li Y, Zhao Y (2013) Heterogeneous Fenton-like discoloration of Rhodamine B using natural schorl as catalyst: optimization by response surface methodology. Env Sci Pollut Res 20:5764–5772.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1578-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gilpavas E, Dobroz-Gomoz I G-GM (2012) Decolorization and mineralization of Diarylide Yellow 12 (PY12) by photo-Fenton process : the Response Surface Methodology as the optimization tool Edison GilPavas, Izabela Dobrosz-Gómez and Miguel Ángel Gómez-García. Water Sci Technol 65:1795–1801.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fathinia M, Khataee AR, Zarei M, Aber S (2010) A: chemical comparative photocatalytic degradation of two dyes on immobilized TiO2 nanoparticles: Effect of dye molecular structure and response surface approach. J Mol Catal AChemical 333:73–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2010.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sharma S, Kapoor S, Sharma RAC (2017) Effect of Fenton process on treatment of simulated textile wastewater: optimization using response surface methodology. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1253-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mason R, Gunst R, Hess J (2003) Statistical design and analysis of experiments with applications to engineering and science, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rosales E, Sanromán MA, Pazos M (2012) Application of central composite face-centered design and response surface methodology for the optimization of electro-Fenton decolorization of Azure B dye. Env Sci Pollut Res 19:1738–1746.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0668-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Saldana-Robels A, Gerra-Sanchez R, Maldonado-Rubio MP-HJ (2014) Optimization of the operating parameters using RSM for the Fenton oxidation process and adsorption on vegetal carbon of MO solutions. J Ind Eng Chem 20:848–857.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Montogomery D (2010) Design and analysis of experimenters, 7th edn. Wiley India Pvt Ltd, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Novais JM, Pinheiro HM (2001) Effect of some operational parameters on textile dye biodegradation in a sequential batch reactor. J Biotechnol 89:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Palm JC, Jenkins D, Parker DS (1980) Relationship between organic oxygen sludge dissolved loading, and concentration in the completely settleability mixed activated process sludge. J WPCF 52:2484–2506Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zinatizadeh AAL, Mansouri Y, Akhbari A, Pashaei S (2011) Biological treatment of a synthetic dairy wastewater in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor: statistical modeling using optimization using response surface methodology. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q 17:485–495.  https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ110524034Z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Janczukowicz W, Szewczyk M, Krzemieniewski M, Pesta J (2001) Settling properties of activated sludge from a sequencing batch reactor (SBR)z. Polish J Environ Stud 10:15–20Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Clesceri LS, Greenbaerg AE, Eaton AD (1998) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater (standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater), 20th edn. American Public Health Association (APHA), WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kapdan IK, Oztekin R (2006) The effect of hydraulic residence time and initial COD concentration on color and COD removal performance of the anaerobic-aerobic SBR system. J Hazard Mater 136:896–901.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ong SA, Toorisaka E, Hirata M, Hano T (2005) Treatment of azo dye Orange II in aerobic and anaerobic-SBR systems. Process Biochem 40:2907–2914.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zheng YM, Yu HQ, Sheng GP (2005) Physical and chemical characteristics of granular activated sludge from a sequencing batch airlift reactor. Process Biochem 40:645–650.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.01.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arrojo B, Mosquera-Corral A, Garrido JM, Méndez R (2004) Aerobic granulation with industrial wastewater in sequencing batch reactors. Water Res 38:3389–3399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tay J-H, Liu Q-S, Liu Y (2001) Microscopic observation of aerobic granulation in sequential aerobic sludge blanket reactor. J Appl Microbiol 91:168–175.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01374.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tay J-H, Liu QS, Liu Y (2002) The effects of shear force on the formation, structure and metabolism of aerobic granules. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57:227–233.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Addis Ababa Institute of TechnologyAddis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia
  2. 2.Department of Green chemistry and Technology, Campus KortrijkGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations