, Volume 24, Issue 7–8, pp 47–53 | Cite as

Aanprikken poortkatheter

Nursing Challenge


Hoe prik je een poortkatheter aan en spoel je hem door? We brengen de techniek stap voor stap in beeld.


  1. 1.
    Zottele Bomfim GA, Wolosker N, Yazbek G et al. Comparative Study of Valved and Nonvalved Fully Implantable Catheters Inserted Via Ultrasound-Guided Puncture for Chemotherapy, Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Oct 3, 1–7Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goossens GA, De Waele Y, Jérôme M et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Catheter Injection and Aspiration (CINAS) classification for assessing the function of totally implantable venous access devices, Support Care Cancer. 2016 Feb;24(2):755-761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ignatov A, Ignatov T, Taran A et al. Interval between Port Catheter Flushing Can Be Extended to Four Months, Gynecol Obstet Invest 2010;70:91–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Girda E, Phaeton R, Goldberg GL et al. Extending the interval for port-a-cath maintenance, Modern Chemotherapy 2 (2013) 15-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diaz JA, Rai SN, Wu X et al. Phase II Trial on Extending the Maintenance Flushing Interval of Implanted Ports, Journal of Oncology Practice, Volume 13, Issue 1, January 2017, 22-28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Solinas G, Platini F, Trivellato M et al. Port in oncology practice: 3-monthly locking with normal saline for catheter maintenance, a preliminary report, J Vasc Access 2017; 18(4): 325 – 327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goossens GA, Jérôme M, Janssens C et al. Comparing normal saline versus diluted heparin to lock non-valved totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients: a randomised, non-inferiority, open trial, Ann Oncol (2013) 24 (7): 1892-1899.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beckers MM, Ruven HJ, Seldenrijk CA et al. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer, Thromb Res. 2010 Apr;125(4):318-21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heibl C, Trommet V, Burgstaller S et al.Complications associated with the use of Port-a-Caths in patients with malignant or haematological disease: a single-centre prospective analysis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2010; 19:676–681.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang YF, Lo AC, Tsai CH et al. Higher complication risk of totally implantable venous access port systems in patients with advanced cancer—a single institution retrospective analysis. Palliat Med 2013; 27: 185–191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Non touch techniek:
  12. 12.
    Schulmeister L. A comparison of skin preparation procedures for accessing implanted ports, NITA, vol 10, 1987, p. 45–47.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Infusion therapy standards of practice INS. Supplement to January/February 2016, Volume 39, Number 1S.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hemsworth S, Selwood K, Saene R van, Pizer B, Does the number of exogenous infections increase in paediatric oncology patients when sterile surgical gloves are not worn for accessing Central Venous Access Devices? European Journal of Oncology Nursing (2007) 11, 442–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA et al, Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections (CDC Guidelines), Am J Infect Control 2011;39:S1-34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Els Put
    • 1
  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations