Obedience and Dehumanization: Placing the Dublin Regulation within a Historical Context
This article critically examines the Dublin Regulation and its impact on asylum-seekers, disputing the claim that the regulation is in accordance with human rights treaties. By drawing on case studies of asylum-seekers arriving at refugee shelters in Berlin from eastern and southeast European countries, the article demonstrates that the regulation’s genuine motive is to deter and control non-EU nationals. The case studies in this article show that surveillance mechanisms and EU laws inflict slow violence (Nixon 2011) on asylum-seekers. By applying Hannah Arendt’s remarks on Adolf Eichmann’s “inability to think” (1977), the article suggests that a similar process of “thoughtlessness” is at work within the current human rights violations of the Dublin Regulation. Drawing on the historical legacy of the social work profession, it ultimately proposes a social work model of civil disobedience as a counter strategy.
KeywordsDublin regulation Asylum-seekers Refugees Migration Surveillance Human rights Social work Civil disobedience
- EU (1990). Convention Determining the State Responsible for Examining Applications for Asylum lodged in one of the Member States of the European Communities ("Dublin Convention"), 15 June 1990.Google Scholar
- European Parliament and of the Council (1999). Presidency conclusions, Tampere European Council, 15–16 October 1999.Google Scholar
- European Parliament and of the Council (2013a). Directive 2013/32/EU on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, Article 36 and 38, June 1999.Google Scholar
- European Parliament and of the Council (2013b). Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 26 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast), 29 June 2013.Google Scholar
- European Parliament and of the Council (2016). “Regulation 2016/399 on a union code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders” (Schengen Borders Code, SBC).Google Scholar
- UN General Assembly (1948). Universal declaration of human rights, 10 December 1948, 217 A (III.Google Scholar
- UN General Assembly (1951). Convention relating to the status of refugees, 28 July 1951, United Nations.Google Scholar
Articles, Books, Press Releases, Etc.
- Arendt, H. (1968). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Arendt, H. (1977). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. London: Penguin Books Ltd..Google Scholar
- Dambach, K. (2018). “Church asylum in Germany,” Info Migrants, 22.03.2018. Accessed 19.09.2018: <http://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/8049/church-asylum-in-germany>.
- Deleuze, G. (1992). “Postscript on the societies of control,” trans. Joughin, M., MIT Press, October, Vol. 59. pp. 3–7.Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1983) Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, trans. Hurley, R. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte (2010) “What Are Human Rights? Four Schools of Thought.” Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 32, Number 1, February 2010, 1–20.Google Scholar
- Den Boer, M., & Goudappel, F. (2014). How secure is our privacy in Seceurope? European security through surveillance. In F. Davis, N. McGarrity, & G. Williams (Eds.), Surveillance, Counter-Terrorism and Comparative Constitutionalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Doebbler, C. F., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). United Kingdom asylum law in its European context. London: GEMS SOAS publications.Google Scholar
- Erwin, S. (2000). Living by algorithm: Smart surveillance and the society of control. Humanities and Technology Review. Fall 2015, Volume 34, pp. 28–69.Google Scholar
- European Commission, Migration and Home Affairs (2017). Identification of applicants (EURODAC). Accessed 18.07.2018. <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/asylum/identification-of-applicants_en,>.
- European Commission, Migration and Home Affairs (2018a). Memo, Common European Asylum System. Accessed: 18.06.18. <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/asylum_en.>.
- European Commission, Migration and Home Affairs (2018b). Asylum shopping. Accessed 21.08.2018. <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/content/asylum-shopping_en.>.
- Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the College De France, 1975–1976 (pp. 259). New York: Picador.Google Scholar
- Freire, P. (1974). Education for critical consciousness. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Frontex European Border and Coast Guard Agency (2017). “Eurosur.” Accessed: 17.06.18. <http://frontex.europa.eu/intelligence/eurosur/.>.
- Giamimo, C. (2017). The little-known passport that protected 450,000 refugees. Atlas obscura. Accessed: 25.10.2018. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/nansen-passport-refugees
- Gore, M. S. (1969). Social work and its human rights aspects, Social welfare and human rights, proceedings of the XIVth International conference on social welfare, New York: Columbia University Press for ICSW, pp. 56–68.Google Scholar
- Hannum, H. (2004). Guide to international human rights practice (4th ed.). New York: Transnational Publishers Lc.Google Scholar
- Lambert, J. (2008). Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. European Parliament. “Report on the evaluation of the Dublin system.” Accessed 15.10.18 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A6-2008-0287&language=EN
- Nordling, V. (2017). Destabilising citizenship practices? Social work and undocumented migrants in Sweden (Lund Dissertations in Social Work 51 ed.).Google Scholar
- Nyers, P. (2006). Rethinking refugees: Beyond states of emergency. New York: Routhledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Ristik, J. (2017). “The right to asylum and the principle of non-refoulement under the European Convention on Human Rights. European Scientific Journal. October 2017 edition Vol.13.Google Scholar
- Salter, M. B. (2003). Rights of passage: The passport in international relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
- Soysal, Y. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Staub-Bernasconi, S. (2006). Soziale Arbeit : Dienstleistung oder Menschenrechtsprofession? Zum Selbstverständnis sozialer Arbeit in Deutschland mit einem Seitenblick auf die internationale Diskussionslandschaft. In W. Lesch & A. Lob-Hüdepohl (Eds.), Einführung in die Ethik der Sozialen Arbeit. München: Schöningh.Google Scholar
- Staub-Bernasconi, S. (2014). Transcending disciplinary, professional and national borders in social work education. In C. Noble, H. Strauss, B. Littlechild (Eds), Global social work: Crossing borders, blurring boundaries (pp. 27–40). Sydney: Sydney University Press. Google Scholar
- UNHCR (2007). Advisory opinion on the extraterritorial application of non-refoulement obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 Protocol, 26 January 2007. Accessed 15.10.18. <http://www.refworld.org/docid/45f17a1a4.html>.
- UNHCR (2009). Nansen - a man of action and vision. Accessed 25.10.2018. < http://www.unhcr.org/events/nansen/4aae50086/nansen-man-action-vision.html>.
- UNHCR (2016). “The Dublin Regulation. Regulation establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national.” Info sheet. Accessed 18.06.18. <http://www.unhcr.org/4a9d13d59.pdf.>.
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Publications by NGOs, EU and Other State Organizations
- Diakonia Germany et al. (2015.). Memorandum for a free choice of host country in the EU respecting refugees’ interests.Google Scholar
- Diakonie (2018). “Familienzusammenführungen im Rahmen der Dublin-III Verordnung nach Deutschland Anspruch – Verfahren – Praxistipps.”Google Scholar
- ECtHR, Press Unit (2016). Factsheet – “Dublin” cases.Google Scholar
- EU, Migrationsverket (2014). “I’m in the Dublin procedure – what does this mean?” Information for applicants for international protection found in a Dublin procedure, pursuant to article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.Google Scholar
- European Parliament, Policy Department C: Citizen’s rights and constitutional affairs (2015). Enhancing the common European asylum system and alternatives to Dublin study.Google Scholar
- Flüchtlingsrat Berlin e.V. (2017). Handlungsoptionen im Fall von Abschiebungen aus Sammelunterkünften eine Handreichung für Sozialarbeiter_innen und Betreuer_innen.Google Scholar
- Förderverein PRO ASYL e.V (2015a). Erniedrigt, misshandelt, schutzlos: Flüchtlinge in Bulgarien.Google Scholar
- Förderverein PRO ASYL e.V (2015b). Erste Hilfe gegen Dublin-Abschiebungen Basiswissen und Tipps für die Einzelfallarbeit.Google Scholar
- Nicholson, F. (2018). The “essential right” to family unity of refugees and others in need of international protection in the context of family reunification. Independent Consultant division of international protection UNHCR. Google Scholar