Advertisement

Awareness Aspects and Effects on Coordination and Information Sharing in the Domain of Software Engineering as CSCW: An Ethnographic Study

  • Simon Elias BibriEmail author
Original Paper
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

This study sets out to understand and explore awareness in software engineering as a form of collaborative work in terms of its entailment and implication. In doing so, it intends to answer the following two questions: What are the aspects of awareness that are most relevant to the domain of software engineering? In what ways does awareness affect coordination and information sharing among collaborating actors in the domain of software engineering? An ethnographic methodology was espoused in order to test existing theoretical perspectives and generalizations pertaining to cooperative awareness. The study shows that what constitutes awareness beyond what and where of work context is, to a great extent, contingent upon the requirements and objectives of each professional domain with respect to the nature and complexity of joint activities and the manner in which the collaborating actors interact with each other accordingly. This also depends on the role they play in cooperative endeavors. The aspects that are most relevant to the domain of software engineering include work-oriented information on each others’ activities, tasks as moment-by-moment work processes, general information of all collaborating actors, detailed information about each others’ attention and responsibility as to ongoing projects, changes to shared document repositories and workspaces, and the delicate interplay between individual and cooperative activities. Moreover, the study corroborates the importance of awareness information for successful and effective collaboration in the domain of software engineering in terms of coordination and information sharing. Accordingly, awareness affects coordination and information sharing in ways that it ensures that the contributions of collaborating actors are relevant to the coordinated work and their actions are evaluated according to the coordinated goals, reduces the effort associated with coordination and information sharing in terms of using CSCW synchronous and asynchronous technologies as well as the frequency of this use, keeps the collaboration efforts to a minimum, enables to structure activities and avoid duplication of work and to fine-grain synergistic group and shared working behavior in relation to coordinated tasks, and acts as a foundation for (and predictor for) closer collaboration in terms of coordination and information sharing. In addition, in the domain of software engineering, the contextual conditions that determine the manner in which coordination and information sharing can be achieved are mostly personal, experiential, and/or professional. This study suggests that it is important to focus on awareness as a set of theoretical perspectives and to support technologies pertaining to work practice in relevance to the domain when designing and evaluating CSCW systems in order to achieve more effective and efficient outcomes in terms of coordination and information sharing as social processes.

Keywords

Software engineering CSCW Awareness Collaborative technologies Collaboration Ethnography Coordination Information sharing 

Notes

Authors’ Contribution

The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The study is an integral part of a Ph.D. research endeavor being undertaken at NTNU.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Abran A, Moore JW, Bourque P, Dupuis R (2004) Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge (SWEBOK), IEEE Computer SocietyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bardram JE, Hansen TR (2010) Context-based workplace awareness: concepts and technologies for supporting distributed awareness in a hospital environment. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput (JCSCW) 19(2):105–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bannon LJ, Schmidt K (1989) CSCW: four characters in search of a context. In: ECSCW’89, 13–15 Sept. Gatwick, London, pp 358–372Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bentley R, Dourish P (1995) Medium versus mechanism: supporting collaboration through customization. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer-supported cooperative work ECSCW ‘95, Stockholm, Sweden, Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bentley R, Rodden T, Sawyer P, Sommerville I, Hughes J, Randall D, Shapiro D (1992) Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work—CSCW’92 (Oct. 31–Nov. 4, Toronto, Canada), New York, ACM, pp 123–129Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bibri SE (2015) The human face of Ambient Intelligence, cognitive, emotional, affective, behavioral, and conversational aspects. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bibri SE (2015) The shaping of ambient intelligence and the internet of things: historico-epistemic, socio-cultural, politico-institutional and eco-environmental dimensions. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blomberg J, Burrell M (2012) An ethnographic approach to design. In: Jacko JA (ed) Human–computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1025–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blomberg J, Karasti H (2012) Ethnography: positioning ethnography within participatory design. In: Simonsen J, Robertson T (eds) Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge, London, pp 86–116Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blomberg J, Karasti H (2013) ‘Reflections on 25 years of ethnography in CSCW. Comput Support Cooper Work J (CSCW) 22(4–6):373–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blomberg J, Giagomi J, Mosher A, Swenton-Wall P (1993) Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: Schuler D, Namioka A (eds) Participatory design: principles and practices, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 123–155Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borning A, Travers M (1991) Two approaches to casual interaction over computer and video networks. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI’91 (Apr. 27–May 2, New Orleans, LO), ACM, New York, pp 13–20Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cabitza F, Simone C (2013) Computational coordination mechanisms: a tale of a struggle for flexibility. Comput Support Cooper Work J (CSCW) 22:4–6Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Denscombe M (2007) The Good research guide. McGraw-Hill House, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dey AK (2000) Providing architectural support for building context-aware applications. PhD thesis, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dey AK (2001) Understanding and using context. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 5(1):4–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dey AK, Abowd GD, Salber D (2001) A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Hum Comput Interact 16(2–4):97–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dourish P, Bellotti V (1992) Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work—CSCW’92, Oct. 31–Nov. 4, ACM, Toronto, Canada, New York, USA, pp 107–114Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dourish P, Bly S (1992) Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI’92, May 3–7, ACM, Monterey, CA, pp 541–547Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Falzon MA (2009) Introduction. In: Falzon MA (ed) Multi-sited ethnography: theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research surrey, Ashgate, Burlington, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fine GA (1993) Ten lies of ethnography. J Contemp Ethnogr 22(3):267–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fitzpatrick G, Ellingsen G (2013) A review of 25 years of CSCW research in healthcare: contributions, challenges and future agendas. Comput Support Cooper Work (CSCW) 22:609–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gaver WW (1992) The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. Proceedings of CSCW’92 (Toronto, 1–4 November, 1992). ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goodwin C, Duranti A (1992) Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grasso MA, Convertino G (2012) Collective intelligence in organizations: tools and studies [Special theme of (CSCW)]. J Collab Comput Work Pract 21:4–5Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Greif I (1988) Computer-supported cooperative work: a book of readings. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San MateoGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gross T (2013) Supporting effortless coordination: 25 years of awareness research. Comput Support Cooper Work J (CSCW) 22:4–6Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gross T, Prinz W (2004) Modelling shared contexts in cooperative environments: concept, implementation, and evaluation. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput (JCSCW) 13(3–4):283–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gross T, Stary C, Totter A (2005) User-centered awareness in computer-supported cooperative work-systems: structured embedding of findings from social sciences. Int J Hum Comput Interact (IJHCI) 18(3):323–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grudin J (1994) Computer-supported cooperative work: history and focus. IEEE Comput 27(5):19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grudin J, Poltrock S (2012) CSCW: computer supported cooperative work. In: Soegaard M, Dam RF (eds.) Encyclopedia of human–computer interaction, Interaction-Design.org Foundation, viewed 10 November 2016. http://www.interactiondesign.org/encyclopedia/cscw_computer_supported_cooperative_work.html
  32. 32.
    Gutwin C, Greenberg S (2002) A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput 11(3–4):411–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Harper RR, Hughes JA, Shapiro DZ (1989) Working in harmony: an examination of computer technology in air traffic control. In: Proceedings of the first European conference on computer-supported cooperative work—ECSCW’89 (Sept. 13–15, Gatwick, UK), Dordrecht, Elsevier, pp 73–86Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Heath C, Luff P (1992) Collaboration and control: crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput 1:69–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heath C, Luff P (1996) Convergent activities: line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In: Engestroem Y, Middleton D (eds) Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 96–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Herskovic V, Pino JA, Ochoa SF, Antunes P (2007) Evaluation methods for groupware systems. In: International conference on groupware: design implementation and use, Springer, Country, 16–20 September, pp 328–336Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hammersley M (1990) ‘What’s wrong with ethnography? The myth of theoretical description. Sociology 24:597–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ishii H, Kobayashi M, Grudin J (1992) Integration of interpersonal space and shared workspace: ClearBoard design and experiments. In proceedings of CSCW’92. ACM, New York, pp 33–42Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johansen R (1988) Groupware: computer support for business teams. The Free Press, MumbaiGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Johannesson P, Perjons E (2012) A design science primer. CreateSpace, Scotts ValleyzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Johnson-Lentz P, Johnson-Lentz T (1982) Groupware: the process and impacts of design choices. In: Kerr EB, Hiltz SR (eds) Computer-mediated communication systems: status and evaluation. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Khan M, Sulaiman S, Tahir M, Said AM (2011) Domain-based classification of CSCW systems. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 3(11):1315–1319Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kirsh D (2001) The context of work. Hum Comput Interact 16:305–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kozulin A (1986) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Am Psychol 41(3):264–274MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kuuti K (1991) Activity theory and it application to information systems research and development. In: Missen HE (ed) Information systems research. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 529–549Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lanamäki A, Väyrynen K (2016) Six issues in which IS and CSCW research communities differ. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on the design of cooperative systems, 23–27 May, Trento, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Leinonen P, Jaervela S, Haekkinen P (2005) Conceptualising the awareness of collaboration: a qualitative study of a global virtual team. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput (JCSCW) 14(4):301–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nardi BA (1996) Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In: Nardi BA (ed) Context and consciousness. The MIT Press, London, pp 69–102Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Olson G, Olson J (2003) Mitigating the effects of distance on collaborative intellectual work. J Econ Innov New Technol 12(1):27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Penichet VMR, Marin I, Gallud JA, Lozano MD, Tesoriero RA (2007) Classification method for CSCW systems. In: Electronic notes in theoretical computer science, vol 168, Elsevier, 16–17 November, pp 237–247Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Porter S (1993) Critical realist ethnography: the case of racism and professionalism in a medical setting. Sociology 27:591–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Prinz W (2006) Industry perspective on Collaborative Environments. In: Ballesteros IL (ed) New collaborative working environments 2020, Report on industry–led FP7 consultations and 3rd report of the experts group on Collaboration@Work. European Commission, DG Information Society and Media, Bruxelles, pp 5–22Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rittenbruch M, McEwan G (2009) An historical reflection of awareness in collaboration. In: Markopoulos P, de Ruyter B, Mackay W (eds) Awareness systems: advances in theory, methodology, and design, Springer, London, pp 3–48Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schmidt K (2000) The critical role of workplace studies in CSCW. In: Luff P et al (eds) Workplace studies: recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schmidt K (2002) The problem with awareness: introductory remarks on awareness in CSCW. J Collab Comput 11(3–4):285–298Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schmidt K (2009) Divided by a common acronym: on the fragmentation of CSCW. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on computer-supported cooperative work, 7–11 September, Springer, London, Vienna, Austria, pp 223–242Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schmidt K (2011) The concept of “work’’ in CSCW. Comput Support Cooper Work (CSCW) 20(4–5):341–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schmidt A, Beigl M, Gellersen HW (1999) There is more to context than location. Comput Gr UK 23(6):893–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Schmidt K, Bannon L (2013) Constructing CSCW: the first quarter century. Comput Support Cooper Work (CSCW) 22(4–6):345–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schmidt K, Heath C, Rodden T (2002) Preface of the special issue on awareness in CSCW. Comput Support Cooper Work J Collab Comput 11(3–4):iii–ivGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human–machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Suchman L (2005) Introduction to plans and situated actions II: human–machine reconfigurations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ulrich W (2008) Information, context, and critique: context awareness of the third kind. In: The 31st information systems research seminar in scandinavia, Keynote talk presented to IRIS 31Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceThe Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations