Advertisement

An outranking approach for hesitant 2-tuple linguistic sets

  • Shahzad Faizi
  • Tabasam Rashid
  • Sohail Zafar
Original Paper
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

The hesitant 2-tuple linguistic set (H2TLS), a special case of hesitant 2-tuple linguistic representation model, not only can express the qualitative preferences of the decision makers (DMs), but can effectively reflect their uncertainty and hesitancy with the help of translation parameter containing more than one element assigned to each linguistic variable of the linguistic term set (LTS). This paper develops an outranking method to address the solution to multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems in the context of hesitant 2-tuple linguistic information. The main contribution of this paper is twofold. One is to propose the outranking relations of H2TLEs based on the proposed directional Hausdorff distance. Another is to establish an outranking method, similar to the ELECTRE method, to solve MCGDM problems in which attributes are evaluated by hesitant 2-tuple linguistic arguments under certain criteria. Last but not the least, a numerical example and a comparison analysis of the results obtained both in the proposed method and fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) method for H2TLSs based on the generalized distance measure are conducted to verify the practicality and effectiveness of the work.

Keywords

Hesitant 2-tuple linguistic set Directional Hausdorff distance 2-tuple linguistic model Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets Multi-criteria group decision making Outranking approach 

Notes

References

  1. Bao G, Lian X, He M, Wang L (2010) Improved two-tuple linguistic representation model based on new linguistic evaluation scale. J Control Decis 25(5):780–784MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Beg I, Rashid T (2016) Hesitant 2-tuple linguistic information in multiple attributes group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30:109–116CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellman R, Zadeh L (1970) Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Manag Sci 17(4):141–164MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Benayoun R, Roy B, Sussman B (1966) ELECTRE: Une méthode pour guider le choix en presence de points de vue multiples. Note de travail 49, SEMA-METRA International, Direction ScientifiqueGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen N, Xu Z (2015) Hesitant fuzzy electre ii approach: a new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems. Inf Sci 292:175–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen S, Chen C (2011) Handling forecasting problems based on high-order fuzzy logical relationships. Exp Syst Appl 38(4):3857–3864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen S, Hong J (2014) Multicriteria linguistic decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and the aggregation of fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 286:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen S, Tanuwijaya K (2011) Fuzzy forecasting based on high-order fuzzy logical relationships and automatic clustering techniques. Exp Syst Appl 38(12):15425–15437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen S, Wang N, Pan J (2009) Forecasting enrollments using automatic clustering techniques and fuzzy logical relationships. Exp Syst Appl 36(8):11070–11076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen S, Munif A, Chen G, Liu H, Kuo B (2012) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights. Exp Syst Appl 39(7):6320–6334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dong Y, Li C, Herrera F (2016) Connecting the linguistic hierarchy and the numerical scale for the 2-tuple linguistic model and its uses to deal with hesitant unbalanced linguistic information. Inf Sci 367–368:259–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faizi S, Rashid T, Zafar S (2017) An outranking method for multi-criteria group decision making using hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic term sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32:2153–2164CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Figueira J, Mousseau V, Roy B (2005) Electre methods. In: Fuguera J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, vol 39. Springer, Boston, pp 133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greco S, Kadziński M, Mousseau V, Owiński RS (2011) Electre\(^{GKMS}\): robust ordinal regression for outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 214(1):118–135MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta P, Muhuri P (2018) Computing with words for student strategy evaluation in an examination. Granular Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41,066-018-0109-2 Google Scholar
  16. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Set Syst 115(1):67–82MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(6):746–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Set Syst 78(1):73–87MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L (2008) A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(2):354–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hwang C, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Hwang C, Lai Y, Liu T (1993) A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput Oper Res 20:889–899CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee L, Chen S (2015a) Fuzzy decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic operators. Inf Sci 294:513–529MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee L, Chen S (2015b) Fuzzy decision making and fuzzy group decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(3):1119–1137MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Liao H, Xu Z (2015) Approaches to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information based on the cosine distance and similarity measures for hfltss and their application in qualitative decision making. Exp Syst Appl 42:5328–5336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng X (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf Sci 271:125–142MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng X (2015) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic vikor method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(5):1343–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liao H, Yang L, Xu Z (2018) Two new approaches based on electre II to solve the multiple criteria decision making problems with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Appl Soft Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.11.049 Google Scholar
  28. Martínez L, Herrera F (2012) An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: extensions, applications and challenges. Inf Sci 207:1–18MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mendel J (2007) Computing with words and its relationships with fuzzistics. Fuzzy Set Syst 177:988–1006MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. Pedrycz W, Chen S (2011) Granular computing and intelligent systems: design with information granules of higher order and higher type. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pedrycz W, Chen S (2015a) Granular computing and decision-making: interactive and iterative approaches. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pedrycz W, Chen S (2015b) Information granularity, big data, and computational intelligence. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peng H, Wang J (2016) Hesitant uncertain linguistic z-numbers and their application in multi-criteria group decision making problems. Int J Fuzzy Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40,815-016-0257-y Google Scholar
  34. Peng J, Wang J, Wang J, Yang L (2015) An extension of electre to multi-criteria decision making problems with multi-hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 307:113–126MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Peng J, Wang J, Wu X (2016) An extension of the electre approach with multi-valued neutrosophic information. Neural Comput Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00,521-016-2411-8 Google Scholar
  36. Qin J, Liu X, Martínez L (2018) Granular computing in decision making. Granular Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41,066-018-0098-1 Google Scholar
  37. Rashid T, Faizi S, Xu Z, Zafar S (2018) Electre based outranking method for multi-criteria decision making using hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic term sets. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(1):78–92MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Herrera F (2011) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. In: Wang Y, Li T (eds) Foundations of intelligent systems. Advances in intelligent and soft computing, vol 122. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 287–295.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25664-6_34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodríguez R, Martínez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers M, Bruen M (1998) A new system for weighting environmental criteria for use within electre III. Eur J Oper Res 107(3):552–563CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Roy B (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods. Theory Decis 31:49–73MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539MATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Vahdani B, Jabbari A, Roshanaei V, Zandieh M (2010) Extension of the electre method for decision making problems with interval weights and data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50(5–8):793–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang H, Chen S (2008) Evaluating students’ answerscripts using fuzzy numbers associated with degrees of confidence. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(2):403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang J, Hao J (2006) A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14(3):435–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang J, Hao J (2007) Fuzzy linguistic pert. IIEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(2):133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang J, Wang D, Zhang H, Chen X (2014a) Multi-criteria outranking approach with hesitant fuzzy sets. OR Spectr 36:1001–1019MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang J, Wu J, Wang J, Zhang H, Chen X (2014b) Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision making problems. Inf Sci 288:55–72MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang J, Wang J, Zhang H, Chen X (2015) Multi-criteria decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowl Based Syst 86:224–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang J, Kuang J, Wang J, Zhang H (2016) An extended outranking approach to rough stochastic multi-criteria decision making problems. Cognit Comput 8(6):1144–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wei C, Liao H (2016) A multigranularity linguistic group decision making method based on hesitant 2-tuple sets. Int J Intell Syst 31:612–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wei C, Zhao N, Tang X (2014) Operators and comparisons of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(3):575–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xu Y (2011) Distance measure for linguistic decision making. Syst Eng Proc 1:450–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu Z (2008) Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 178:452–467MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. Xu Z, Chen J (2007) An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 177(1):248–263MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Xu Z, Xia M (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181:2128–2138MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. Yoon K (1987) A reconciliation among discrete compromise situations. J Oper Res Soc 38:277–286CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. Zadeh L (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 9:43–80MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. Zadeh L (1997) Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Set Syst 90(2):111–127MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang Z, Wu C (2014) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(5):2185–2202MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhou H, Wang J, Zhang H (2016a) Multi-criteria decision making approaches based on distance measures for linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets. J Oper Res Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2016.41 Google Scholar
  63. Zhou H, Wang J, Zhang H (2016) Stochastic multi-criteria decision making approach based on smaa-electre with extended grey numbers. Int Trans Oper Res.  https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12,380 Google Scholar
  64. Zhou W, Xu Z (2016) Generalized asymmetric linguistic term set and its application to qualitative decision making involving risk appetites. Eur J Oper Res 254(2):610–621MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhu B, Xu Z (2014) Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Management and TechnologyLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations