Advertisement

Maclaurin symmetric means of dual hesitant fuzzy information and their use in multi-criteria decision making

  • Zhiming Zhang
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper investigates the Maclaurin symmetric mean (MSM) within the context of dual hesitant fuzzy sets and develops the dual hesitant fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean (DHFMSM), which can address the issues in previous dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators. Moreover, we put forward the geometric Maclaurin symmetric mean considering both the MSM and the geometric mean and apply it to propose a dual hesitant fuzzy geometric Maclaurin symmetric mean (DHFGMSM), followed by its several properties and special cases. Subsequently, considering the importance of each argument, the weighted DHFMSM and the weighted DHFGMSM are presented and used to develop an algorithm for realistic multi-criteria decision-making problems. Finally, the practicality of the new results is illustrated by a case study, and the advantages of the new results are highlighted by a comparison with other existing methods.

Keywords

Dual hesitant fuzzy set DHFMSM DHFGMSM WDHFMSM WDHFGMSM MCDM 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61672205), the Scientific Research Project of Department of Education of Hebei Province of China (No. QN2016235), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei University (Nos. 799207217073 and 799207217108).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human or animal participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Atanassov K, Gargov G (1989) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31:343–349MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen SM (1998) Aggregating fuzzy opinions under the group decision-making environment. Cybern Syst 29(4):363–376zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen SM, Chang YC (2011) Weighted fuzzy rule interpolation based on GA-based weight-learning techniques. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19(4):729–744Google Scholar
  5. Chen SM, Han WH (2018) A new multiattribute decision making method based on multiplication operations of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology. Inf Sci 429:421–432MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen SM, Lee LW (2010a) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 37(1):824–833Google Scholar
  7. Chen SM, Lee LW (2010b) Fuzzy multiple criteria hierarchical group decision-making based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 40(5):1120–1128Google Scholar
  8. Chen SM, Lee LW (2011) Fuzzy interpolative reasoning for sparse fuzzy rule-based systems based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):9947–9957Google Scholar
  9. Chen SM, Tanuwijaya K (2011) Fuzzy forecasting based on high-order fuzzy logical relationships and automatic clustering techniques. Expert Syst Appl 38(12):15425–15437Google Scholar
  10. Chen SM, Lee SH, Lee CH (2001) A new method for generating fuzzy rules from numerical data for handling classification problems. Appl Artif Intell 15(7):645–664Google Scholar
  11. Chen SM, Yang MW, Yang SW, Sheu TW, Liau CJ (2012a) Multicriteria fuzzy decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 39(15):12085–12091Google Scholar
  12. Chen SM, Munif A, Chen GS, Liu HC, Kuo BC (2012b) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights. Expert Syst Appl 39(7):6320–6334Google Scholar
  13. Chen N, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2013a) Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis. Appl Math Model 37(4):2197–2211MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen N, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2013b) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 37:528–540Google Scholar
  15. Chen SM, Cheng SH, Chiou CH (2016) Fuzzy multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning methodology. Inf Fusion 27:215–227Google Scholar
  16. Detemple DW, Robertson JM (1979) On generalized symmetric means of two variables. Univ Beograd Publ Elektrotehn Fak Ser Mat Fiz 634:236–238MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Garg H, Kumar K (2019) Improved possibility degree method for ranking intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application in multiattribute decision making. Granul Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-018-0092-7 Google Scholar
  18. Jamkhaneh EB, Garg H (2018) Some new operations over the generalized intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision-making process. Granul Comput 3(2):111–122Google Scholar
  19. Joshi DK, Kumar S (2018) Entropy of interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy set and its application to group decision making problems. Granul Comput 3(4):367–381Google Scholar
  20. Ju YB, Yang SH, Liu XY (2014a) Some new dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators based on Choquet integral and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(6):2857–2868MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Ju YB, Zhang WK, Yang SH (2014b) Some dual hesitant fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(5):2481–2495MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Khan MSA, Abdullah S, Ali A, Amin F (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy prioritized aggregation operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. Granul Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-018-0093-6 Google Scholar
  23. Klement EP, Mesiar R (2005) Logical, algebraic, analytic, and probabilistic aspects of triangular norms. Elsevier, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Klir G, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang DC, Xu ZS, Liu D (2017) Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets with dual hesitant fuzzy information. Inf Sci 396:127–143Google Scholar
  26. Liu PD, Chen SM (2017) Group decision making based on Heronian aggregation operators of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(9):2514–2530Google Scholar
  27. Liu J, Liang Y (2018) Multi-granularity unbalanced linguistic group decision making with incomplete weight information based on VIKOR method. Granul Comput 3(3):219–228Google Scholar
  28. Liu PD, Chen SM, Liu J (2017) Multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy interaction partitioned Bonferroni mean operators. Inf Sci 411:98–121MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Maclaurin C (1729) A second letter to martin folkes, esq.; concerning the roots of equations, with demonstration of other rules of algebra. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 36:59–96Google Scholar
  30. Mahmooda T, Liu P, Yec J, Khana Q (2018) Several hybrid aggregation operators for triangular intuitionistic fuzzy set and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Granul Comput 3(2):153–168Google Scholar
  31. Mizumoto M, Tanaka K (1976) Some properties of fuzzy sets of type 2. Inf Control 31:312–340MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Nguyen HT, Walker EA (1997) A first course in fuzzy logic. CRC Press, Boca RatonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Pecaric J, Wen JJ, Wang WL, Lu T (2005) A generalization of Maclaurin’s inequalities and its applications. Math Inequal Appl 8:583–598MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Rahman K, Abdullah S (2018) Generalized interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to group decision making. Granul Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-018-0082-9 Google Scholar
  35. Ren ZL, Xu ZS, Wang H (2017) Dual hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison method. Inf Sci 388–389:1–16Google Scholar
  36. Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119Google Scholar
  37. Tang J, Meng FY (2019) Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to group decision making. Granul Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-018-0089-2 Google Scholar
  38. Tang XA, Fu C, Xu DL, Yang SL (2017) Analysis of fuzzy Hamacher aggregation functions for uncertain multiple attribute decision making. Inf Sci 387:19–33MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529–539zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Tyagi SK (2015) Correlation coefficient of dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its applications. Appl Math Model 39(22):7082–7092MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang HY, Chen SM (2008) Evaluating students’ answerscripts using fuzzy numbers associated with degrees of confidence. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(2):403–415Google Scholar
  42. Wang CY, Chen SM (2018) A new multiple attribute decision making method based on linear programming methodology and novel score function and novel accuracy function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. Inf Sci 438:145–155MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang HJ, Zhao XF, Wei GW (2014) Dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(5):2281–2290MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang L, Shen QG, Zhu L (2016) Dual hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 38:23–50Google Scholar
  45. Ye J (2014) Correlation coefficient of dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Appl Math Model 38:659–666MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Yu DJ (2014) Some generalized dual hesitant fuzzy geometric aggregation operators and applications. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 22(3):367–384zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Yu DJ (2015) Archimedean aggregation operators based on dual hesitant fuzzy set and their application to GDM. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 23(5):761–780MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Yu DJ, Li DF, Merigo JM (2016a) Dual hesitant fuzzy group decision making method and its application to supplier selection. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 7(5):819–831Google Scholar
  49. Yu DJ, Zhang WY, Huang G (2016b) Dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators. Technol Econ Dev Econ 22(2):194–209Google Scholar
  50. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Contr 8:338–356zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-1. Inf Sci 8:199–249MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao H, Xu ZS, Liu SS (2017) Dual hesitant fuzzy information aggregation with Einstein t-conorm and t-norm. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 26(2):240–264Google Scholar
  53. Zhu B, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2012) Dual hesitant fuzzy sets. J Appl Math.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/879629 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. Zulueta-Veliz Y, Sánchez PJ (2018) Linguistic dynamic multicriteria decision making using symbolic linguistic computing models. Granul Comput 3(3):229–244Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mathematics and Information ScienceHebei UniversityBaodingChina

Personalised recommendations