Advertisement

Development of tz curve for piles in sands under uplift force

  • Mohamed Ashour
  • Ayman Altahrany
  • Aser AbbasEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

A methodology is developed to assess the load transfer (tz) curves of piles in sandy soils under uplift/tension force based on soil–pile interaction. Compared to current practice, the proposed approach accounts for soil and pile properties and contributes to the improvement in the construction of a nonlinear (springs) tz curve in sandy soil which can be utilized with other computer codes to model the soil–pile response under tension forces (i.e., seismic events). The technique determines the mobilized shear stress/strain in soil associated with pile upward displacement at the soil–pile interface under progressing tension forces. A nonlinear soil constitutive model is employed to evaluate the variation of soil shear stress/strain at the soil–pile interface up to failure. The presented approach accounts for the influence of the pile length and diameter on the predicted tz curve and has been validated through a number of comparisons with measured pile-head response and tz curves.

Keywords

Sand Tension Uplift tz Curve Pile-head response 

References

  1. 1.
    API (American Petroleum Institute) (2014) Geotechnical and foundation design considerations. Addendum 1, ANSI/API recommended practice 2GEO, API Publishing Services, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    API (2007) Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms. API RP2A, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashour M, Norris G, Pilling P (1998) Lateral loading of a pile in layered soil using the strain wedge model. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(4):303–315.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1998)124:4(303) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashour M, Helal A (2017) Pre-and post-liquefaction response of axially loaded piles in sands. Int J Geomech.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carvalho D, Albuquerque D (2013) Uplift behavior of bored piles in tropical unsaturated sandy soil. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, vol 4, pp 2707–2710Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chattopadhyay C, Pise J (1986) Uplift capacity of piles in sand. J Geotech Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1986)112:9(888) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Nicola A, Randolph F (1993) Tensile and compressive shaft capacity of piles in sand. J Geotech Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1993)119:12(1952) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Nicola A (1996) The performance of pipe piles in sand. Dissertation submitted for the degree of doctor of philosophy, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gavin K, Igoe D, Doherty P (2011) Piles for offshore wind turbines: a state-of-the-art review. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 164(GE4):245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) (1986) Foundations and earth structures. Design manual 7.02, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Alexandria, VAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norris M (1986) Theoretically based BEF laterally loaded pile analysis. In: Third international conference on numerical methods in offshore piling, Editions Technip. Paris, France, pp 361–386Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mansur I, Kaufman I (1958) Pile tests, Low-sill structure, Old River, Louisiana. J Soil Mech Found Div (ASCE) 123(1):715–743Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mindlin D (1936) Force at a point in the interior of a semi-infinite solid. Physics 7:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Neil W, Hassan H (1994) Drilled shafts: effects of construction on performance and design criteria. In: Proceedings, international conference on deep foundations, FHWA, Orlando, FL, vol 1, pp 137–187Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Neil W, Reese C (1999) Drilled shafts: construction procedures and design methods, FHWA-IF-99-025. U.S. Dept. of transportation, FHWA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Neil M, Raines R (1991) Load transfer for pipe piles in highly pressured dense sand. J Geotech Eng 117(8):1208–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1991)117:8(1208) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Randolph F, Wroth P (1978) Analysis of deformation of vertically loaded piles. J Geotech Eng (ASCE) 104(12):1465–1488Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reddy B, O’Reilly M, Chapman D (1997) A software to predict the behaviour of tension piles. Comput Struct 62(4):653–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reddy B, O’Reilly M, Chapman N (1998) Modified T–Z model—a software for tension piles. Comput Struct 68(1998):613–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinsky I, Morrison F (1964) Sand displacement and compaction around model friction piles. Can Geotech J 1(2):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sulaiman H, Coyle M (1976) Uplift resistance of piles in sand. J Geotech Eng Div 102(5):559–562Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1991) Engineering and design: design of pile foundations. Engineer manual No. 1110-2-2906, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Civil EngineeringAlabama A&M UniversityNormal, AlabamaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Structural EngineeringMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt

Personalised recommendations