Reliability assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) bridges due to service loading

  • Abhijeet Dey
  • Ghanshyam Miyani
  • Arjun SilEmail author
Technical Paper


The performance and reliability of highway bridges deteriorate with respect to time due to aggressive environmental conditions such as corrosion, freeze–thaw, alkali–silica reaction and increasing road freight volumes, resulting in effective influences in service life of the structure as well as potential loss of the economy. Thus, it becomes necessary to consider life-cycle cost with these aggressive environmental conditions during the survival period of degrading highway bridges for better planning and management. In this study, an implementation of time-dependent reliability approaches in the serviceability and safety evaluation of highway girder bridges under aggressive environmental conditions has been investigated for both time-dependent non-stationarities in the loads and strength. The influence of several parameters such as live-load variations, rate of occurrence of live load, degradation of initiation time, strength degradation rate, correlation of strength and number of bridge girders affected on the time-dependent structural reliability of bridges are examined. Parametric analysis is carried out to show the responsiveness of time-dependent structural reliability with the initial strength of component and strength deterioration models. Thus, the analysis of results indicates helpful information that could be employed for superior forecasting of the effective service life of degrading RC bridges as well as in predicting the optimum time for periodic inspection and creating maintenance strategies for continued service life of the bridges.


Reliability Bridge Load Strength Component Time-dependent 


  1. 1.
    AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) (2007) LRFD bridge design specifications. AASHTO, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) (2008) The manual for bridge evaluation. AASHTO, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailey SF (1996) Basic principles and load models for the structural safety evaluation of existing road bridges. Thesis No. 1467, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bridge plans for Colorado Bridge L-18-BO (1962) Colorado department of transportation, Staff Bridge Inspection Branch, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang SE, Shinozuka M (1996) Life-cycle cost analysis with natural hazard risk. J Infrastruct Syst ASCE 2(3):118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crumpton CF, Bukovatz JE (1974) Corrosion and Kansas bridges. Transp Res Rec 500:25–31Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Enright MP, Frangopol DM (1996) Reliability-based analysis of degrading reinforced concrete bridges. In: Frangopol DM, Hearn G (eds) Structural reliability in bridge engineering: design, inspection, assessment, rehabilitation and management. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Enright MP, Frangopol DM, Hearn G (1996) Degradation of reinforced concrete bridges under aggressive conditions. In: Chong KP (ed) Materials for the new millennium, vol 2. ASCE, pp 978–987Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ellingwood BR (2005) Risk-informed condition assessment of civil infrastructure: state of practice and research issues. Struct Infrastruct Eng 1(1):7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Enright MP, Frangopol DM (1998) Service-life prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges. J Struct Eng ASCE 124(3):309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Estes AC (1997) A system reliability approach to the lifetime optimization of inspection and repair of highway bridges. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil, Environmental and Architecture Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frangopol DM, Estes AC (1997) Lifetime bridge maintenance strategies based on system reliability. Struct Eng Int 7(3):193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frangopol DM, Lin K-Y, Estes AC (1997) Reliability of reinforced concrete girders under corrosion attack. J Struct Eng ASCE 123(3):286–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frangopol DM, Lin KY, Estes AC (1997) Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 123(10):1390–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghosn M, Moses F (1986) Reliability calibration of bridge design code. J Struct Eng ASCE 112(4):745–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    IRC:18 (2000) Design criteria for prestressed concrete road bridges (post-tensioned concrete). The Indian Road Congress, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    IRC:21 (2000) Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges, section III, cement concrete (plain and reinforced). The Indian Road Congress, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    IRC:6 (2014) Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges, section II, loads and stresses. The Indian Road Congress, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li QW, Wang C, Ellingwood BR (2015) Time dependent reliability of aging structures in the presence of non-stationary loads and degradation. Struct Saf 52:132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin K-Y (1995) Reliability-based minimum life cycle cost design of reinforced concrete girder bridges. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil, Environmental and Architecture Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    LRFD Bridge design specifications (1994) 1st edn, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    LRFD Bridge design specifications (2001) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    MacGregor JG, Mirza SA, Ellingwood B (1983) Statistical analysis of resistance of reinforced and prestressed concrete members. J Am Concr Inst 80(3):167–176Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Management and Monitoring Systems: Proposed Rule (1993) Federal register, vol 58 (No. 39; March 2), pp 12096–12125Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mori Y, Ellingwood B (1993a) Methodology for reliability-based condition assessment: application to concrete structures in nuclear plants. NUREG/CR-6052, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mori Y, Ellingwood B (1993) Reliability-based service-life assessment of aging concrete structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 119(5):1600–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Novokshchenov V (1989) Condition survey of prestressed concrete bridges. Concr Int 11(9):60–68Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nowak AS (1993) Calibration of LRFD bridge design code. Final rep. NCHRP 12-33, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nowak AS, Yarnani AS, Tabsh SW (1994) Probabilistic models for resistance of concrete bridge girders. ACI Struct J Am Concr Inst 91(3):269–276Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shroff AC (1988) Evaluating a 50 year old concrete bridge. Concr Int 10(5):56–62Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thoft-Christensen P, Jensen FM, Middleton CR, Blackmore A (1997) Assessment of the reliability of concrete slab bridges, structural reliability theory, vol R9616, no 157. Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, AalborgGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frangopol DM, Corotis RB, Rackwitz R (eds) (1996) Reliability and optimization of structural systems. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 321–328Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vaysburd AM (1990) Rehabilitation of an elevated roadway bridge. Concr Int 12(9):45–50Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang C, Li QW, Ellingwood BR (2016) Time-dependent reliability of ageing structures: an approximate approach. Struct Infrastruct Eng 12(12):1566–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Whiting DA, Stejskal BG, Nagi MA (1993) Condition of prestressed concrete bridge components: technology review and field surveys. FHWA-RD-93-037, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Woodward RJ (1989) Collapse of a segmental post-tensioned concrete bridge. Transp Res Rec 1211:38–59Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yanev B (1996) The management of bridges in New York City. In: Frangopol DM, Hearn G (eds) Structural reliability in bridge engineering. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, pp 78–89Google Scholar
  38. 38. Accessed 9 Jan 2018Google Scholar
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
  41. 41.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNIT SilcharAssamIndia

Personalised recommendations