Advertisement

Food Ethics

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 35–48 | Cite as

Vegetable Diversity, Productivity, and Weekly Nutrient Supply from Improved Home Gardens Managed by Ethnic Families - a Pilot Study in Northwest Vietnam

  • To Thi Thu Ha
  • Jen Wen Luoh
  • Andrew Sheu
  • Le Thi Thuy
  • Ray-yu YangEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Assess to quality diets is a basic human right. Geographical challenges and cultural traditions have contributed to the widespread malnutrition present among ethnic minorities of mountainous areas in Northwest Vietnam. Home gardens can play a role in increased diet diversity and micronutrient intakes. However, low production yields and plant diversity in ethnic home gardens have limited their contributions to household food security and nutrition. The pilot study tested a home garden intervention in weekly vegetable harvests and increasing household production and consumption of diverse vegetables year-round. Food ethics issues encountered included limited access to quality food by resource-poor groups, conflicts arising from low preference and value given to some nutritious foods, limited access to information and technology for food production and consumption, each of which were addressed in the study design. The intervention includes: (1) nutrition-focused home garden training and (2) locally-adapted home garden packages consisting of garden planning, technical assistance, and high-yielding seed varieties. Twenty households from two ethnic villages in Son La province participated in the study and were randomly assigned into two groups (intervention and non-intervention). The total vegetable supply from weekly harvests of home garden produce was significantly higher in the intervention households (226 kg) compared to the non-intervention households (39 kg). The intervention group yielded 5.8 and 1.7 times more vegetables by weight and weight per area than those without the intervention. The vegetables were mainly consumed at home for both groups, but the intervention households gave more vegetables as gifts to neighbors. The intervention group cultivated a higher diversity of vegetables with a total of 42 different vegetables compared to 24 in the non-intervention group, which is reflected in an overall higher nutritional yield of vitamin A, iron, other micronutrients and phytochemicals. The home garden training significantly improved the amount, diversity and continuity of household food and nutrient supply. The home garden model is effective and could be scaled up to improve household vegetable supply and consumption, particularly in Northwest Vietnam.

Keywords

Home garden Vegetables Nutritional yield Diversity Developing countries 

Abbreviations

CGIAR

Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research

FAO

Food and Agriculture Organization

FAVRI

Fruit and Vegetable Research Institute

INFOODS

International Network of Food Data Systems

INI

National Institute of Nutrition in Vietnam

NUTTAB

Food Standards Australia New Zealand.

RAE

Retinol Activity Equivalent

RDA

Recommended Dietary Allowances

USDA

United States Department of Agriculture

WHO

World Health Organization

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the gardeners providing their time and collecting data, to Vietnam National Institute of Nutrition developing and providing nutrition trainings for the study. This research was funded by CGIAR Humidtropics Program and by long-term strategic donors to the World Vegetable Center: Republic of China (Taiwan), UK aid by the UK government, United States Agency for International Development, Australian Center for International Agricultural Research, Germany, Thailand, Philippines, Korea, and Japan.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

The informed consent for the training program and providing yearly harvest data was obtained from all the study participants and the community leaders.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berti, P.R., J. Krasevec, and S. Fitz Gerald. 2004. A review of the effectiveness of agriculture interventions in improving nutrition outcomes. Public Health Nutrition 7: 599–609.  https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2003595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chadha, M.L., and M.O. Oluoch. 2003. Home-based vegetable gardens and other strategies to overcome micronutrient malnutrition in developing countries. Food Nutr Agric: 17–23.Google Scholar
  3. Galhena, D., R. Freed, and K.M. Maredia. 2013. Home gardens: A promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing. Agric Food Secur 2: 8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2048-7010-2-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gao, J., T. He, and Q.M. Li. 2012. Traditional home-garden conserving genetic diversity: A case study of Acacia pennata in Southwest China. Conservation Genetics 13: 891–898.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0338-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. GSO. Statiscal yearbook of Vietnam 2014. Hanoi: Statistical publishing house; 2014.Google Scholar
  6. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449): 1435–1446.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huong, L.T., V. Thi, and T. Nga. 2013. Nutritional practices among ethnic minorities and child malnutrition in mountainous areas of Central Vietnam. Food and Nutrition Sciences 4: 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, K.M., S.E. Specio, P. Shrestha, K.H. Brown, and L.H. Allen. 2005. Nutrition knowledge and practices, and consumption of vitamin A-rich plants by rural Nepali participants and nonparticipants in a kitchen-garden program. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 26: 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khan, N.C., and P. Van Hoan. 2008. Vietnam recommended dietary allowances 2007. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 17: 409–415.Google Scholar
  10. Kim, Do Thi, T.G. Lien, and H.H. Khoi. 1998. Development of Vietnamese recommended dietary allowances and their use for the National Plan of action for nutrition. Nutrition Reviews: 56.Google Scholar
  11. King, F.S., A. Burgess, V.J. Quinn, and A.K. Osei. 2015. Nutrition for developing countries. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. NIN. Table 1 : Prevelance of undernutrition by severity – 2014 - by 6 ecological region. Hanoi: 2014.Google Scholar
  13. NIN, UNICEF. 2010. General nutrition survey 2009–2010. Hanoi: Medical Publishing House.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prendergast, A.J., and J.H. Humphrey. 2014. The stunting syndrome in developing countries. Paediatr Int Child Health 34: 250–265.  https://doi.org/10.1179/2046905514Y.0000000158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sunwar, S., C.-G. Thornström, A. Subedi, and M. Bystrom. 2006. Home gardens in western Nepal: Opportunities and challenges for on-farm management of agrobiodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 4211–4238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3576-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vlkova, M., Z. Polesny, V. Verner, J. Banout, M. Dvorak, J. Havlik, et al. 2010. Ethnobotanical knowledge and agrobiodiversity in subsistence farming: Case study of home gardens in Phong my commune, Central Vietnam. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 58: 629–644.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9603-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wezel, A., and S. Bender. 2003. Plant species diversity of homegardens of Cuba and its significance for household food supply. Agroforestry Systems 57: 39–49.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022973912195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.World Vegetable Center, Vietnam Office c/o Fruit and Vegetable Research InstituteHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.World Vegetable CenterTainanTaiwan
  3. 3.Fruit and Vegetable Research InstituteHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations