Advertisement

The Indian Journal of Labour Economics

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 549–575 | Cite as

Estimating Labor Demand Elasticities and Elasticities of Substitution in Egyptian Manufacturing Sector: A Firm-Level Static Analysis

  • Hanan NazierEmail author
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

This paper analyzes central issues of labor demand: How do wages affect employers demand for labor? And does this differ according to skill levels? Specifically, this study measures the own-wage elasticities of the demand for labor, in addition to the elasticities of substitution between different labor inputs disaggregated according to skill in Egypt. Estimates of such phenomena at the firm level are rare for developing countries in general and for Egypt in particular, and this paper happens to be the first in the Egyptian case. The evidence indicates that unskilled workers are substitutes for all other labor types, while all other three types—the semiskilled production workers, skilled workers and professionals—are complements to each other. Results also indicate that skilled workers wage elasticities are higher than those for all other types of labor. We can also conclude that labor demand in Egypt is inelastic, no matter the skill level.

Keywords

Labor demand Elasticities of substitution Own-wage elasticities Egypt 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Economic Research Forum (Grant No. 2016-025).

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. 2002. Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market. Journal of Economic Literature 1 (1): 7–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addison T., L. Bellmann, T. Schank, and P. Teixeira. 2005. The Demand for Labor: An Analysis Using Matched Employer-Employee Data from the German LIAB. Will the High Unskilled Worker Own-Wage Elasticity Please Stand Up?” IZA Discussion Paper No. 1780, Institute for the Study of Labor, September.Google Scholar
  3. Addison, T., P. Portugal, and J. Varejão. 2014. Labor Demand Research: Towards a Better Match between Better Theory and Better Data. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8125, Institute for the Study of Labor, April.Google Scholar
  4. Akhter, N and A. Ali. 2007. Does Trade Liberalization Increase the Labor Demand Elasticities? Evidence from Pakistan. MPRA Paper No. 3881. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/3881.
  5. Anderson, G., and J. Thursby. 1986. Confidence Intervals for Elasticity Estimators in Translog Models. Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (4): 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angrist, J.D., and A.B Krueger. 1999. Empirical strategies in labor economics. In Handbook of Labor Economics, ed. Orly C, vol. 3, 1277–1366. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Ashenfelter, O., and R. Ehrenberg. 1975. The demand for labor in the pubhc sector. Labor in the public and nonprofit sectors, ed. D. Hamermesh, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Assaad, R. 2008. Labor Supply, Employment and Unemployment in the Egyptian Economy: 1988–2006. ERF Working Paper No. 0701, Economic Research Forum, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  9. Assaad, R., F. El-Hamidi and A. Ahmedet. 2000. The Determinants of Employment Status in Egypt. Discussion Paper, 88, Food Consumption and Nutrition Division (FCND), International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Atta, S. K. and E.A. Shehata. 2008. Estimation of demand on human labor input in the Egyptian agricultural according to dual approach. MPRA Paper No. 43398.Google Scholar
  11. Autor, D., L. Katz, and A. Krueger. 1998. Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 1169–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Autor, D., L. Katz, and M. Kearney. 2008. Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists. Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (2): 300–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Autor, David H., and D. Dorn. 2009. The Growth of Low Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market. NBER Working Paper No. 15150.Google Scholar
  14. Awad, I. 2003. Economic Reform, Employment, and Employment Policy in Egypt. Aspects of Structural Reform with Special Reference to the Egyptian Economy. Department of Economics 8th Conference, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  15. Bashier, A., and N. Wahban. 2013. The Determinants of Employment in Jordan: A Time Series Analysis. International Review of Management and Business Research 2 (4): 927.Google Scholar
  16. Behar, A. 2004. Estimates of Labor Demand Elasticities of Substitution Using Firm Level Manufacturing Data. CSSR Working Paper No. 98, Centre for Social Science Research, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  17. Behar, A. 2008. Are Skilled and Unskilled Labor Complements or Substitutes? Skill Supply, Cheap Capital, and Unskilled Labor Demand. Saarbrucken: VDM Press.Google Scholar
  18. Behar, A. 2010. Would Cheaper Capital Replace Labor? South African Journal of Economics 78: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bellmann, L., S. Bender, and T. Schank. 1999. Flexibility of Firms’ Labor Demand: Substituability or Complementarity. National Economic and Statistics Yearbook 219 (1/2): 109–126.Google Scholar
  20. Bergin, P., R. Feenstra, and G. Hanson. 2009. Offshoring and Volatility: Evidence from Mexico’s Maquiladora Industry. The American Economic Review 99: 1664–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bergstroe, M.V., and E. Panas. 1992. How Robust is the Capital-skill Complementarity Hypothesis? Review of Economics and Statistics 74: 540–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Berman, E., J. Bound, and S. Machin. 1998. Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 1245–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Berman, E., J. Bound, and Z. Griliches. 1994. Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufactures. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 367–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bernal, R. and M. Cardenas. 2003, November. Determinants of Labor Demand in Colombia: 1976–1996. NBER Working Paper 10077, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  25. Berndt, E. 1991. The Practice of Econometrics, Classic and Contemporary. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  26. Berndt, E., and M. Khaled. 1979. Parametric Productivity Measurement and Choice Among Flexible Functional Forms. Journal of Political Economy 87: 1220–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Betts, J.R. 1997. The Skill Bias of Technological Change in Canadian Manufacturing Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 79: 146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Binswanger, H. P. 1974. A cost function approach to the measurement of elasticities of factor demand and elasticities of substitution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56 (2): 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Black, S., and H. Kelejian. 1970. A Macro Model of the U.S. Labor Market. Econometrica 38: 712–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bond, S., and J. Van Reenen. 2007. Microeconometric models of investment and employment. Handbook of Econometrics, 6: 4417–4498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Borjas, J. 1987. Immigrants, Minorities, and Labor Market Competition. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 40 (3): 382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Borjas, G. J. 2003. The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (4): 1335–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Borjas, J., B. Freeman, and F. Katz. 1997. How Much Do Immigration and Trade Affect Labor Market Outcomes? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Brown, M., and J.S. de Cani. 1963. A measure of technological employment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 45: 386–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Buch, C., and M. Schlotter. 2013. Regional Origins of Employment Volatility: Evidence from German States. Empirica 40: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Buscher, H., C. Dreger, R. Ramos, and J. Surinach. 2005, September. The Impact of Institutions on the Employment Performance in European Labor Markets. IZA DP No. 1732, Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  37. Card, D. 1990. The Impact of Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review XLIII: 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Card, D. 2001. Immigration Inflows, Native Outflows, and the Local Labor Market Impacts of Higher Immigration. Journal of Labor Economics XIX: 22–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Central Authority for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS), Labor Force Sample Surveys, Various years.Google Scholar
  40. Chow, G., and G. Moore. 1972. An econometric model of business cycles. In Econometric Models of Cyclical Behavior, ed. B. Hickman. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  41. Christensen, L., D. Jorgenson, and L. Lau. 1973. Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers. Review of Economics and Statistics 55 (1): 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Chung, J. 1994. Utility and Production Functions. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Coen, R., and B. Hickman. 1970. Constrained Joint Estimation of Factor Demand and Production Functions. Review of Economics and Statistics 52: 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. De Ferranti, G., et al. 2002. Closing the Gap: Technology and Wages in Latin America. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  45. Dessus, S. and, A., Suwa-Eisenmann. 1999. Trade Integration with Europe & Labor Reallocations in the South Mediterranean Countries: The Case of Egypt. ERF Working paper 9918, Economic Research Forum.Google Scholar
  46. Dhrymes, P. 1969. A model of short-run labor adjustment. In The Brookings Model: Some Further Results, ed. James Duesenberry et al. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  47. Drazen, A., D. Hamermesh, and N. Obst. 1984. The Variable Employment Elasticity Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence. Research in Labor Economics 6: 287–309.Google Scholar
  48. Dunne, T., and M. Roberts. 1993. The Long Run Demand for Labor: Estimates from Census Establishment Data. CES Discussion Paper No 93-13, Center for Economic Studies, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  49. El-Ehwany, N., and El-Laithy, H. 2000. Poverty, Employment and Policy-Making in Egypt: Country Profile. Towards Decent Work in North Africa, 1, International Labor Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  50. El-Megharbel, N. 2007. The Impact of Recent Macro and Labor Market Policies on Job Creation Policies in Egypt. ECES Working Paper No. 123, The Egyptian Center for Economic Studies, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  51. Fabbri, F., J. Haskel, and M. Slaughter. 2003. Does Nationality of Ownership Matter for Labor Demand? Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 698–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Fajnzylber, P. and F. Maloney. 2001. How Comparable are Labor Demand Elasticities across Countries? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2658, World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  53. Fajnzylber, P., and W. Maloney. 2005. Labor Demand and Trade Reform in Latin America. Journal of International Economics 66 (2): 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Falk, M., and K. Seim. 1999. Workers’ skill level and information technology: Evidence from German service firms. In A Panel Analyzes of the Wage Structure and Qualification, Contributions to Employment Research, vol. 229, ed. L. Bellmann and V. Steiner, 79–116. Nurnberg: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  55. Falk, M., and K. Seim. 2001a. The Impact of Information Technology on High-Skilled Labor in Services: Evidence from Firm-Level Panel Data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 10 (4): 289–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Falk, M., and K. Seim. 2001b. Workers’ Skill Level and Information Technology: A Censored Regression Model. International Journal of Manpower 22 (1/2): 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Falk, M., and M. Koebel. 2004. The Impact of Office Machinery, and Computer Capital on the Demand for Heterogeneous Labor. Labor Economics 11 (1): 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Fawzy, S. 2002. Investment Policies and Unemployment Problem in Egypt. ECES Working Paper No. 68, The Egyptian Center for Economic Studies, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  59. Fergany, N. 1998. Dynamics of Employment Creation and Destruction, Egypt, 1990–1995. Research Notes, Vil.11, January. Cairo: Al Mishkat Center for Research and Training.Google Scholar
  60. FitzRoy, F., and M. Funke. 1995. Capital-Skill Complementarity in West German Manufacturing. Empirical Economics 20 (4): 651–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. FitzRoy, F., and M. Funke. 1998. Skills, Wages and Employment in East and West Germany. Regional Studies 32 (5): 459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Franz, W., and H. Konig. 1986. The Nature and Causes of Unemployment in the Federal Republic of Germany Since the 1970s: An Empirical Investigation. Economica, Supplement: Unemployment 53 (210): S219–S244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Freeman, R. 1975. Demand for labor in a nonprofit market: university faculty. In Labor in the Public and Nonprofit Sectors, ed. D. Hamermesh. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Freier, R., and V. Steiner. 2010. “Marginal Employment” and the Demand for Heterogeneous Labor: Elasticity Estimates from a Multi-Factor Labor Demand Model for Germany. Applied Economics Letters 17 (12): 1177–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Fukase, E. 2012. Export Liberalization, Job Creation, and the Skill Premium: Evidence from the US-Vietnam Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). World Development 41: 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Görg, H., M. Henry, E. Strobl, and F. Walsh. 2006, December. Multinational Companies, Backward Linkages and Labor Demand Elasticities. IZA DP No. 2506, Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  67. Greene, W. H. 2008. Econometric analysis, 6 edn. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  68. Grossman, J. 1982. The Substitutability of Natives and Immigrants in Production. Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (4): 596–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hall, E. 1991. Labor demand, labor supply, and employment volatility. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1991, vol. 6, ed. Olivier Jean Blanchard and Stanley Fischer. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Hamermesh, D. 1983. New measures of labor cost: implications for demand elasticities and nominal wage growth. In The Measurement of Labor Cost, ed. J. Triplett. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Hamermesh, D.S. 1989. Labor demand and the structure of adjustment costs. American Economic Review, 79 (4): 674–689.Google Scholar
  72. Hamermesh, D. 1993. Labor Demand. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Hansson, P. 1996. Trade, Technology and Changes in Employment of Skilled Labor in Swedish Manufacturing. Working Paper No. 131, Trade Union Institute for Economic Research, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  74. Hansson, P. 1999. Relative Demand for Skills in Swedish Manufacturing: Technology or Trade. Working Paper No. 152, Trade Union Institute for Economic Research, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  75. Hasan, R., D. Mitra, and K. Ramaswamy. 2007. Trade Reforms, Labor Regulations, and Labor Demand Elasticities: Empirical Evidence from India. The Review of Economics and Statistics 89 (3): 466–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Hassan, M. and C. Sassanpour. 2008. Labor Market Pressures in Egypt: Why is the Unemployment Rate Stubbornly High? Paper Presented to the International Conference on The Unemployment Crises in the Arab Countries organized by Arab Planning Institute, 17–18 March, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  77. Hijzen, A., and P. Swaim. 2008. Offshoring, Labor Market Institutions and the Elasticity of Labor Demand. GEP Research Paper, 2008/05.Google Scholar
  78. Ibrahim, A. 2013. The Determinants of Private Sector Demand for Employment in Egypt: 1990–2007. Advances in Management and Applied Economics 3 (1): 163–182.Google Scholar
  79. Jacobi, L., and S. Schaffner. 2008. Does Marginal Employment Substitute Regular Employment? A Heterogeneous Dynamic Labor Demand Approach for Germany, 56. No: Ruhr Economic Papers.Google Scholar
  80. Jenkins, R. 2004. Vietnam in the Global Economy: Trade, Employment and Poverty. Journal of International Development 16 (1): 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Jenkins, R. 2006. Globalization, FDI and Employment in Vietnam. Transnational Corporations 15 (1): 115.Google Scholar
  82. Kaiser, U. 2000. New Technologies and the Demand For Heterogeneous Labor: Firm-Level Evidence for the German Business-Related Service Sector. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9 (5): 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Kien, T.N., and Y. Heo. 2009. Impacts of Trade Liberalization on Employment in Vietnam: A System Generalized Method of Moments Estimation. The Developing Economies 47 (1): 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Kirkpatrick, G. 1982. Real Factor Prices and German Manufacturing Employment: A Time Series Analysis 1960(1)–1979(4). Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 118 (1): 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kolling, A., and T. Schank. 2002. New Evidence on the Determinants of the Employment Structure from Linked Employer-Employee Panel Data for Germany. In 10th International Conference on Panel Data, Berlin. International Conferences on Panel Data.Google Scholar
  86. Krishna, P., D. Mitra, and S. Chinoy. 2001. Trade Liberalization and Labor Demand Elasticities: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of International Economics 55 (2): 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Krusell, P., L. Ohanian, J. Rios-Rull, and G. Violante. 2000. Capital-Skill Complementarity and Inequality: A Macroeconomic Analysis. Econometrica 68: 1029–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. LaLonde, Robert J., and Robert H. Topel. 1991. Labor market adjustments to increased immigration. In Immigration, trade, and the labor market, eds. John M. Abowd and Richard B. Freeman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  89. Levasseur, S. 2010. International Outsourcing Over the Business Cycle: Some Intuition for Germany, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Eastern Journal of European Studies 1: 165–185.Google Scholar
  90. Lichter, A., A. Peichl and S. Siegloch, 2012, April. Micro-Level Labor Demand Estimation for Germany. NEUJOBS Working Papers D 10.3.Google Scholar
  91. Lichter, A., A. Peichl, and S. Siegloch. 2013, July. Exporting and Labor Demand: Micro-Level Evidence from Germany. IZA DP No. 7494, Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  92. Machin, S. 1996. Changes in the relative demand for skills. In Acquiring Skills: Market Failures, Their Symptoms and Policy Responses, ed. A.L. Booth and D.J. Snower. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Machin, S., and J. Van Reenen. 1998. Technology and Changes in Skill Structure: Evidence from Seven OECD Countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 1215–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. McCaig, B. 2011. Exporting Out of Poverty: Provincial Poverty in Vietnam and U.S. Market Access. Journal of International Economics 85 (1): 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mellander, E. 1999. The Multi-dimensional Nature of Labor Demand and Skill-Biased Technical Change. IUI Working Paper Series, 518.Google Scholar
  96. Meriküll, J. and T. Rõõm. 2014. Are Foreign-Owned Firms Different? Comparison of Employment Volatility and Elasticity of Labor Demand. Economics and Business Working Paper No. 126, Centre for Comparative Economics.Google Scholar
  97. Micevska, M. 2008. The Labor Market in Macedonia: A Labor Demand Analysis. Labour 22 (2): 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Mitra, D., and J. Shin. 2012. Import Protection, Exports and Labor-Demand Elasticities: Evidence from Korea. International Review of Economics and Finance 23 (C): 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Morrison, C., and E. Berndt. 1981. Short-run Labor Productivity in a Dynamic Model. Journal of Econometrics 16: 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Nassar, H., 2011. Growth, Employment Policies and Economic Linkages: Egypt. Employment Working Paper 85, Employment Sector, ILO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  101. Navaretti, G., D. Checchi, and A. Turrini. 2003. Adjusting Labor Demand: Multinational Versus National Firms: A Cross-European Analysis. Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (2–3): 708–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Nazier, H. 2013. Trade Liberalization and Labor Demand Elasticities: Empirical Evidence for Egypt. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 111: 32.Google Scholar
  103. Nguyen, K.T. 2013. Determinants of labor demand in the manufacturing sector: Does firm ownership matter. Mimeo, Crawford School of Public Policy.Google Scholar
  104. Nickell, S. 1981. An investigation of the Determinants of Manufacturing Employment in the United Kingdom. Discussion Paper No. 105, Centre for Labor Economics, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  105. Nickell, S., and J. Symons. 1990. The Real-Wage Employment Relationship in the United States. Journal of Labor Economics 8: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Ottaviano, G., and G. Peri. 2012. Rethinking the Effect of Immigration of Wages. Journal of the European Economic Association 10 (1): 152–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Ottaviano, G., G. Peri, and G. Wright. 2013. Immigration, Offshoring and American Jobs. American Economic Review 103 (5): 1925–1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Pischke, J., and J. Velling. 1997. Employment Effects of Immigration to Germany: An Analysis Based on Local Labor Markets, 594–604. LXXIX: Review of Economics and Statistics.Google Scholar
  109. Pissaridaes, C. 1993. Labor Markets in the Middle East and North Africa. Middle East and North Africa Working Paper Series; No. 5.. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  110. Radwan, S. 2002. Employment and Unemployment in Egypt: Conventional Problems, Unconventional Remedies. ECES Working Paper No. 70. Cairo: The Egyptian Center for Economic Studies.Google Scholar
  111. Ribeiro, E. and P. Jacinto. 2008. A Closer Look at the Recent Skilled Labor Demand Increase in Brazil. Paper presented at the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association (LACEA) and the Latin American Meeting of the Econometric Society (LAMES) 2008 Parallel Meetings, 20–23 November, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
  112. Riley, R. and Young, G. 1999. The skill-bias of technological change in the UK. Paper Presented at EALE Conference, Regensburg 25 September.Google Scholar
  113. Ruiz-Arranz, M. 2001. Wage Inequality and Information Technology. Mimeo: Department of Economics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  114. Saavedra, J., and M. Torero. 2004. Labor Market Reforms and Their Impact over Formal Labor Demand and Job Market Turnover. The Case of Peru. In Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin American and the Caribbean, ed. James J. Heckman and Carmen Pagés. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  115. Schoeni, R.F. 1997. The effect of immigration on the employment and wages of native workers: Evidence from the 1970s and the 1980s. Mimeo, RAND.Google Scholar
  116. Schott, K. 1978. The Relation Between Industrial Research and Development and Factor Demands. Economic Journal 88: 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Senses, Z. 2010. The Effects of Offshoring on the Elasticity of Labor Demand. Journal of International Economics 81: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Slaughter, M. 2001. International Trade and Labor-Demand Elasticities. Journal of International Economics 54 (1): 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Sosin, K., and L. Fairchild. 1984. Nonhomotheticity and Technological Bias in Production. Review of Economics and Statistics 66: 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Steiner, V., and K. Wagner. 1997. Relative Earnings and the Demand for Unskilled Labor in West German Manufacturing. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 97-17.Google Scholar
  121. Symons, J., and R. Layard. 1984. Neoclassical Demand for Labor Functions for Six Major Economies. The Economic Journal 94 (376): 788–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Teal, F. 2000. Real wages and the demand for skilled and unskilled male labour in Ghana's manufacturing sector: 1991–1995. Journal of Development Economics,61 (2): 447–461. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Waud, R. 1968. Man-Hour Behavior in U.S. Manufacturing: A Neoclassical Interpretation. Journal of Political Economy 76: 511–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Zellner, A.. 1962. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests of aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(2): 348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Zimmermann, K. 1991. The Employment Consequences of Technological Advance, Demand and Labor Costs in 16 German Industries. Empirical Economics 16 (2): 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Labour Economics 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Political ScienceCairo UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations