Advertisement

Modeling the effect of silica fume on the compressive, tensile strengths and durability of NSC and HSC in various strength ranges

  • Lajan Burhan
  • Kawan Ghafor
  • Ahmed MohammedEmail author
Research Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify and quantify the effect of silica fume content (SF), water–cement-ratio (w/c) and curing time (t) on the compressive and tensile strengths of concrete at different strength ranges varied from 4 to 100 MPa. In this study, over 1000 data were used to characterize the compressive and tensile strengths behavior. The range of w/c for modified concrete with different percentage of silica fume up to 40% (by dry weight of cement) was in the range of 0.17–0.80%, compressive and tensile strengths were in the range of 4–100 MPa, and 1–7 MPa, respectively. Vipulanandan model correlated the relationship between mechanical properties of concrete modified with SF with a varied range of w/c and curing time and the result were compared with the Hoek–Brown correlation model used in the literature. Based on the coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) the compressive strength (σc), tensile strength (σt) of concrete as a function of w/c, percentage of silica fume and curing time using nonlinear (NLM) relationship quantified very well. Based on the NLM parameters, the effect of SF was less than w/c and curing time on the compressive strength of modified concrete with SF in different strength range. According to the coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE), the Vipulanandan correlation model and Hoek–Brown model both are very close in predicting the mechanical behavior of concrete modified with SF for normal and high strengths concrete (NSC and HSC).

Keywords

Water to cement ratio Curing time Silica fume Mechanical properties Statistical analysis Modelling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Faruk Group Holding, Gasin Cement Co. and Zarya Construction Co. supported this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdelgader HS, El-Baden AS (2015) Effect of silica fume on two-stage concrete strength. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 96, no. 1. IOP Publishing, p 012043Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahad EA, Kapoor EK (2017) A review for characterization of silica fume and its effects on concrete properties. Int J Latest Res Eng Comput 5(3):13–15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexander MG, Magee BJ (1999) Durability performance of concrete containing condensed silica fume. Cem Concr Res 29(6):917–922Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alsalman A, Dang CN, Hale WM (2017) Development of ultra-high performance concrete with locally available materials. Constr Build Mater 133:135–145Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amarkhail N (2015) Effects of silica fume on properties of high-strength concrete. Int J Tech Res Appl 32:13–19Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amudhavalli NK, Mathew J (2012) Effect of silica fume on strength and durability parameters of concrete. Int J Eng Sci Emerg Technol 3(1):28–35Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Atiş CD (2002) Accelerated carbonation and testing of concrete made with fly ash. Constr Build Mater 17(3):147–152Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Behnood A, Ziari H (2008) Effects of silica fume addition and water to cement ratio on the properties of high-strength concrete after exposure to high temperatures. Cem Concr Compos 30(2):106–112Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhanja S, Sengupta B (2002) Investigations on the compressive strength of silica fume concrete using statistical methods. Cem Concr Res 32(9):1391–1394Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhanja S, Sengupta B (2003) Modified water–cement ratio law for silica fume concretes. Cem Concr Res 33(3):447–450Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhanja S, Sengupta B (2005) Influence of silica fume on the tensile strength of concrete. Cem Concr Res 35(4):743–747Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bingöl AF, Balaneji HH (2018) Determination of sulfate resistance of concretes containing silica fume and fly ash. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s4099 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bouzoubaa N, Zhang MH, Malhotra VM (2001) Mechanical properties and durability of concrete made with high-volume fly ash blended cements using a coarse fly ash. Cem Concr Res 31(10):1393–1402Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bui DD, Hu J, Stroeven P (2005) Particle size effect on the strength of rice husk ash blended gap-graded Portland cement concrete. Cem Concr Compos 27(3):357–366Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cwirzen A, Penttala V, Vornanen C (2008) Reactive powder based concretes: mechanical properties, durability and hybrid use with OPC. Cem Concr Res 38(10):1217–1226Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    De sensale G (2006) Strength development of concrete with rice-husk ash. Cem Concr Compos 28(2):158–160Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Demirboğa R (2007) Thermal conductivity and compressive strength of concrete incorporation with mineral admixtures. Build Environ 42(7):2467–2471Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dinakar P, Sahoo PK, Sriram G (2013) Effect of metakaolin content on the properties of high strength concrete. Int J Concr Struct Mater 7(3):215Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dotto JMR, De Abreu AG, Dal Molin DCC, Müller IL (2004) Influence of silica fume addition on concretes physical properties and on corrosion behavior of reinforcement bars. Cem Concr Compos 26(1):31–39Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ganesan K, Rajagopal K, Thangavel K (2008) Rice husk ash blended cement: assessment of optimal level of replacement for strength and permeability properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 22(8):1675–1683Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gastaldini ALG, Isaia GC, Hoppe TF, Missau F, Saciloto AP (2009) Influence of the use of rice husk ash on the electrical resistivity of concrete: a technical and economic feasibility study. Constr Build Mater 23(11):3411–3419Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giaccio G, de Sensale GR, Zerbino R (2007) Failure mechanism of normal and high-strength concrete with rice-husk ash. Cem Concr Compos 29(7):566–574Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Givi AN, Rashid SA, Aziz FNA, Salleh MAM (2010) Assessment of the effects of rice husk ash particle size on strength, water permeability and workability of binary blended concrete. Constr Build Mater 24(11):2145–2150Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Güneyisi E, Gesoğlu M, Özturan T (2004) Properties of rubberized concretes containing silica fume. Cem Concr Res 34(12):2309–2317Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Güneyisi E, Gesoğlu M, Qays MA, Mermerdaş K, İpek S (2019) Fracture properties of high strength metakaolin and silica fume concretes. In: Proceedings of the conference: 3rd international conference on chemical, civil and environmental engineering (CCEE-2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Habeeb GA, Fayyadh MM (2009) Rice husk ash concrete: the effect of RHA average particle size on mechanical properties and drying shrinkage. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 3(3):1616–1622Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hanumesh BM, Varun BK, Harish BA (2015) The mechanical properties of concrete incorporating silica fume as partial replacement of cement. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 5(9):270Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. Proc NARMS-Tac 1(1):267–273Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ismail MS, Waliuddin AM (1996) Effect of rice husk ash on high strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 10(7):521–526Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jianyong L, Pei T (1997) Effect of slag and silica fume on mechanical properties of high strength concrete. Cem Concr Res 27(6):833–837Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Karthikeyan J, Natesan SC (2003) Mechanical properties of high performance concrete using condensed silicafumes. In: Proceedings of the ISHPC, conference: 3rd international PCI/FHWA symposium on high performance concrete, Orlando, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khatib JM (2008) Performance of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash. Constr Build Mater 22(9):1963–1971Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khedr SA, Idriss AF (1995) Resistance of silica-fume concrete to corrosion-related damage. J Mater Civ Eng 7(2):102–107Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kishore R, Bhikshma V, Prakash PJ (2011) Study on strength characteristics of high strength rice husk ash concrete. Proc Eng 14:2666–2672Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lam L, Wong YL, Poon CS (1998) Effect of fly ash and silica fume on compressive and fracture behaviors of concrete. Cem Concr Res 28(2):271–283Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mahdikhani M, Ramezanianpour AA (2014) Mechanical properties and durability of self-consolidating cementitious materials incorporating nano silica and silica fume. Comput Concr 14(2):175–191Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mahmud HB, Malik MFA, Kahar RA, Zain MFM, Raman SN (2009) Mechanical properties and durability of normal and water reduced high strength grade 60 concrete containing rice husk ash. J Adv Concr Technol 7(1):21–30Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mangi SA, Ibrahim MHW, Jamaluddin N, Arshad MF, Jaya RP (2018) Short-term effects of sulphate and chloride on the concrete containing coal bottom ash as supplementary cementitious material. Eng Sci Technol Int J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2018.09.001 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mansor AM, Hamed AM, Borg RP (2016) Effect of silica fume on high performance concrete strength. In: Conference paper (PDF available) March 2016 with 243 reads conference: SBE 16 Malta: Europe and the Mediterranean Towards a Sustainable Built Environment, At Malta, vol 1Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Marikunte SS, Nacer S (2012). Interaction of silica fume and water content on strength and permeability of concrete. In: TRB 2012 Annual MeetingGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mazloom M, Ramezanianpour AA, Brooks JJ (2004) Effect of silica fume on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Cem Concr Compos 26(4):347–357Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    McCarthy MJ, Dhir RK (2004) Development of high volume fly ash cements for use in concrete construction. Fuel 84(11):1423–1432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.08.029 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mohammed AS, Vipulanandan C (2014) Compressive and tensile behavior of polymer treated sulfate contaminated CL soil. Geotech Geol Eng 32(1):71–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9692-9 Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mohammed AS (2018) Vipulanandan models to predict the electrical resistivity, rheological properties and compressive stress-strain behavior of oil well cement modified with silica nanoparticles. Egypt J Pet.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.001 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mohammed A, Mahmood W (2018) Statistical variations and new correlation models to predict the mechanical behavior and ultimate shear strength of gypsum rock. Open Eng 8(1):213–226Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mohammed A, Vipulanandan C (2018) Smart cement compressive piezoresistive, stress–strain, and strength behavior with nanosilica modification. J Test Eval.  https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20170105 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nagendra V, Sashidhar C, Prasanna Kumar SM, Venkata Ramana N (2015) Size and dosage of micro silica fume behaviour for partial replacement of cement in concrete. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng (IOSR-JMCE).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.012 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nath P, Sarker P (2011) Effect of fly ash on the durability properties of high strength concrete. Proc Eng 14:1149–1156Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ngo SH, Huynh TP, Le TTT, Mai NHT (2018) Effect of high loss on ignition-fly ash on properties of concrete fully immersed in sulfate solution. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 371, No. 1. IOP Publishing, p 012007Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Oner A, Akyuz S, Yildiz R (2005) An experimental study on strength development of concrete containing fly ash and optimum usage of fly ash in concrete. Cem Concr Res 35(6):1165–1171Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pardhasaradhi K, Krishna KV (2017) Role of parameters on mechanical properties of fly ash based M30 geopolymer concrete and silica fume concrete. Int J Civ Eng Technol 8(6):534–542 (Article ID: IJCIET_08_06_059) Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Park WS, Kim JE, Eom NY, Kim SW, Kim DG, Cho MS (2013) Mechanical properties of high strength concrete using mineral admixtures. In: Applied mechanics and materials, vol 372. Trans Tech Publications, Pfaffikon, pp 235–238Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Patil HS, Dwivedi AK, Chatterjee AM (2017) Optimize properties of concrete with silica fume. MAYFEB J Mater Sci 2:1–4Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Poon CS, Kou SC, Lam L (2005) Compressive strength, chloride diffusivity and pore structure of high performance metakaolin and silica fume concrete. Constr Build Mater 20(10):858–865Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Poon CS, Lam L, Wong YL (2000) A study on high strength concrete prepared with large volumes of low calcium fly ash. Cem Concr Res 30(3):447–455Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Raghwani JR, Shah D, Bhavsar JK (2016) Performance assessment of pervious concrete by using silica fume. J Civ Eng Environ Technol 3(4):269–273Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sabir BB (1997) Mechanical properties and frost resistance of silica fume concrete. Cem Concr Compos 19(4):285–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(97)00020-6 Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sadati S, Khanzadeh Moradllo M, Shekarchi M (2017) Long-term performance of silica fume concrete in soil exposure of marine environments. J Mater Civ Eng 29(9):04017126Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sata V, Jaturapitakkul C, Kiattikomol K (2007) Influence of pozzolan from various by-product materials on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 21(7):1589–1598Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Shabbar R, Nedwell P, Wu Z (2016) Influence of temperature and curing method on strength of autoclaved aerated concrete. In: 36th Cement and concrete science conference, Cardiff, 5th and 6th September 2016, Paper Number 023Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shannag MJ (2000) High strength concrete containing natural pozzolan and silica fume. Cem Concr Compos 22(6):399–406Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Shelke V, Pawde P, Shrivastava R (2012) Effect of marble powder with and without silica fume on mechanical properties of concrete. GH Raisoni College of Engineering & Technology, India. J Mech Civ Eng 1(1):40–45Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Shetti AP, Das BB (2015) Acid, alkali and chloride resistance of early age cured silica fume concrete. In: Advances in structural engineering. Springer, New Delhi, pp 1849–1862Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Siddique R, Jameel A, Singh M, Barnat-Hunek D, Aït-Mokhtar A, Belarbi R, Rajor A (2017) Effect of bacteria on strength, permeation characteristics and micro-structure of silica fume concrete. Constr Build Mater 142:92–100Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Singh R, Bath GS, Bansal M (2019) Study of high strength concrete using microsilica. Int J Emerg Res Manag Technol.  https://doi.org/10.23956/ijermt.v6i8.174 Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sobolev K (2004) The development of a new method for the proportioning of high-performance concrete mixtures. Cem Concr Compos 26(7):901–907Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Soni DK, Saini J (2014) Mechanical properties of high volume fly ash (HVFA) and concrete subjected to evaluated 120 °C temperature. Int J Civ Eng Res 5(3):241–248 (ISSN 2278-3652, © Research India Publications) Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Srivastava V, Kumar R, Agarwal VC, Mehta PK (2012) Effect of silica fume and metakaolin combination on concrete. Int J Civ Struct Eng 2(3):893–900Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tejaswini C, Narayana SMV, Kumar MTN (2018) An experimental investigation on the relationship between electrical resistivity and mechanical and durability properties of M30 grade concrete. Int Res J Eng Technol 05(09):1–7Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Vignesh G, Selwyn Babu J (2016) Effect of silica fume on properties of high strength concrete with recycled concrete aggregate. Int J Sci Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.06.002 Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2015) Smart cement rheological and piezoresistive behavior for oil well applications. J Pet Sci Eng 135:50–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.08.015 Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wong HS, Razak HA (2005) Efficiency of calcined kaolin and silica fume as cement replacement material for strength performance. Cem Concr Res 35(4):696–702Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wu JH, Pu XC, Liu F, Wang C (2006) High performance concrete with high volume fly ash. In: Key engineering materials, vol 302. Trans Tech Publications, Pfäffikon, pp 470–478Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Xu W, Lo TY, Wang W, Ouyang D, Wang P, Xing F (2016) Pozzolanic reactivity of silica fume and ground rice husk ash as reactive silica in a cementitious system: a comparative study. Materials 9(3):146Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Yazici Ş, Arel HŞ (2012) Effects of fly ash fineness on the mechanical properties of concrete. Sadhana 37(3):389–403 (Sadhan ¯ a¯ Vol. 37, Part 3, June 2012, pp. 389–403. c Indian Academy of Sciences) Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Zain MFM, Safiuddin M, Mahmud H (2000) Development of high performance concrete using silica fume at relatively high water–binder ratios. Cem Concr Res 30(9):1501–1505Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Zhang MH, Lastra R, Malhotra VM (1996) Rice-husk ash paste and concrete: some aspects of hydration and the microstructure of the interfacial zone between the aggregate and paste. Cem Concr Res 26(6):963–977Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of SulaimaniSulaymaniyahIraq

Personalised recommendations