Advertisement

Effects of Linear Acceleration on Passenger Comfort During Physical Driving on an Urban Road

  • Zhen Li
  • Rui Fu
  • Chang Wang
  • Thomas A. StoffregenEmail author
Research paper
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

In this exploratory study, we examined self-reports of physical discomfort among automobile passengers while being driven on an urban road. Eight adults participated as passengers in an automobile driven by a professional driver on a predetermined course through city traffic. Passengers were driven individually along the route. While underway, participants used a handheld device to indicate momentary feelings of discomfort arising from discrete vehicle motions. We continuously recorded vehicle motion in three axes of linear acceleration and 3 axes of angular velocity. We examined vehicle acceleration during the 3 s preceding each subjective response. We found that the maximum absolute acceleration required to elicit subjective discomfort was lower when vehicle acceleration changed sign (from + to −, or vice versa) than when acceleration was of a constant sign. In addition, participants’ reports of discomfort during the experiment were unrelated to their prior self-reports of generalized susceptibility to motion sickness. The results suggest that our method is valid, and has the potential to offer new insights into motion sickness causality.

Keywords

Driving Passenger discomfort Motion sickness Acceleration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants awarded to Rui Fu from Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_17R95), from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51775053), and from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (310822151028).

References

  1. 1.
    Guignard JC, McCauley ME (1990) The accelerative stimulus for motion sickness. In: Crampton GH (ed) Motion and space sickness. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 123–152Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Hanlon JF, MacCauley ME (1974) Motion sickness incidence as a function of the frequency of vertical sinusoidal motion. Aerosp Med 45:366–369Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Turner M, Griffin MJ (1999) Motion sickness in public road transport: the effect of driver, route and vehicle. Ergonom 42:1646–1664.  https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399184730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turner M, Griffin MJ (1999) Motion sickness in public road transport: the relative importance of motion, vision and individual differences. Brit J Psyhol 90:519–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turner M, Griffin MJ (1999) Motion sickness in public road transport: passenger behaviour and susceptibility. Ergonom 42:444–461.  https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO (1997) Mechanical vibration and shock: evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. Part 1, general requirements: International Standard ISO 2631-1: 1997 (E). ISOGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin CY, Chen LJ, Chen YY, Lee WC (2010) A comfort measuring system for public transportation systems using participatory phone sensing. In: International workshop on sensing for app phones (PhoneSense’10, in conjunction with ACM SenSys’10), Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zoccali P, Loprencipe G, Lupascu RC (2018) Acceleration measurements inside vehicles: passengers’ comfort mapping on railways. Measurement 129:489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bodini I, Lancini M, Pasinetti S, Vetturi D (2014) Techniques for on-board vibrational passenger comfort monitoring in public transport. ACTA IMEKO 3(4):32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang ZT, Zhao QM, Yang WQ (2014) Pavement roughness indices related to riding comfort. Appl Mech Mater 505:180–183.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.505-506.180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou Y, Chen S (2016) Vehicle ride comfort analysis with whole-body vibration on long-span bridges subjected to crosswind. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 155:126–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eboli L, Mazzulla G, Pungillo G (2016) Measuring bus comfort levels by using acceleration instantaneous values. Transp Res Proc 18:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keshavarz B, Hecht H (2011) Validating an efficient method to quantify motion sickness. Hum Fact 53:415–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beard GF, Griffin MJ (2014) Discomfort of seated persons exposed to low frequency lateral and roll oscillation: effect of seat cushion. Appl Ergon 45(6):1547–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoberock LL (1977) A survey of longitudinal acceleration comfort studies in ground transportation vehicles. J Dyn Syst Measure Control 99:76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lackner JR, Graybiel A, DiZio PA (1991) Altered sensorimotor control of the body as an etiological factor in space motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 62:765–771Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riccio GE, Stoffregen TA (1991) An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecol Psychol 3:195–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Castellanos JC, Fruett F (2014) Embedded system to evaluate the passenger comfort in public transportation based on dynamical vehicle behavior with user’s feedback. Measurement 47:442–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Golding JF (1998) Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness. Brain Res Bull 47(5):507–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang F, Sagawa K, Inooka H (2000) A study of the relationship between the longitudinal acceleration/deceleration of automobiles and ride comfort. Jpn J Ergon 36:191–200Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu J, Yang K, Shao YM (2018) Ride comfort of passenger cars on two-lane mountain highways based on tri-axial acceleration from field driving tests. Int J Civ Eng 16:335–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smart LJ, Stoffregen TA, Bardy BG (2002) Visually-induced motion sickness predicted by postural instability. Hum Fact 44:451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lawther A, Griffin MJ (1988) A survey of the occurrence of motion sickness amongst passengers at sea. Aviat Space Environ Med 59:399–406Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Diels C, Bos JE (2016) Self-driving carsickness. Appl Ergon 53:374–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sivak M, Schoettle B (2015) Motion sickness in self-driving vehicles. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, pp 1–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhen Li
    • 1
  • Rui Fu
    • 1
  • Chang Wang
    • 1
  • Thomas A. Stoffregen
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.School of AutomobileChang’an UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.School of KinesiologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations