Advertisement

Effect of Porous Media on Hydraulic Jump Characteristics by Using Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics Method

  • SyamsuriEmail author
  • Ming-Jyh Chern
  • Nima Vaziri
Research paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

In order to understand the effect of porous media on hydraulic jumps, a smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) model is applied to investigate the characteristics of hydraulic jumps interacting with porous media. Various porosities including cases without an obstacle or with a solid obstacle or porous media are considered. The opening of a gate was altered to adjust the hydraulic jump. The conjugate depth ratio, bottom shear stress distribution, and energy dissipation are reported. In the present study, validations are in a good agreement with previous studies. Overall, the result showed that the average error between numerical and experimental data was less than 7.2%. Energy dissipation is compared among cases with three porosities, with and without a solid obstacle. The porosity of 0.68 is found to dissipate more energy than do other porosities. Thus, porous media can be used to enhance energy dissipation of hydraulic jumps in an open channel. In conclusion, the proposed SPH model can simulate the effect of porous media on hydraulic jump characteristics.

Keywords

Ecological engineering Free surface flow Energy dissipation Porosity Computational fluid dynamics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude for the financial support given by Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (Project No.: MOST 107-2212-E-011-075-MY3). The authors are grateful to Dr. David Lopez, Dr. Benedict Rogers, Prof. O.M. Faltinsen, Dr. A. Calogrossi, Dr. Rui Xu, and Dr. Songdong Shao for the helpful discussions.

Supplementary material

40999_2019_465_MOESM1_ESM.avi (3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (AVI 3025 kb)
40999_2019_465_MOESM2_ESM.avi (5.1 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (AVI 5273 kb)
40999_2019_465_MOESM3_ESM.avi (5.2 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (AVI 5360 kb)
40999_2019_465_MOESM4_ESM.avi (3.9 mb)
Supplementary material 4 (AVI 3979 kb)
40999_2019_465_MOESM5_ESM.avi (731 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (AVI 732 kb)
40999_2019_465_MOESM6_ESM.avi (3.5 mb)
Supplementary material 6 (AVI 3545 kb)
40999_2019_465_MOESM7_ESM.avi (776 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (AVI 776 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Mohamed Ali HS (1994) Efficiency of stilling basins. In: Natural conference publication institution of engineers, Australia, pp 229–233Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hughes WC, Flack JE (1984) Hydraulic jump properties over a rough bed. J Hydraul Eng 110(12):1755–1771Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riad PHS (2008) A study of the hydraulic performance of stilling basins using physical and numerical models, Master Thesis. UNESCO-IHE Institute. NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alikhani A, Benrozi-Rad R, Fathi-Moghadam M (2010) Hydraulic jump in stilling basin with vertical end sill. Int J Phys Sci 5(1):025–029Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habibzadeh A, Wu S, Ade F, Rajaratnam N (2011) Exploratory study of submerged hydraulic jumps with blocks. J Hydraul Eng 137(6):706–710Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barani GA, Rahnama MB, Sohrabipoor N (2005) Investigation of flow energy dissipation over different stepped spillways. Am J Appl Sci 2(6):1101–1105Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ead SA, Rajaratnam N (2002) Hydraulic jumps on corrugated beds. J Hydraul Eng 128(7):656–663Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lawrence GA (1993) The hydraulics of steady two-layer flow over a fixed obstacle. J Fluid Mech 254:605–633Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim Y, Choi G, Park H, Byeon S (2015) Hydraulic jump and energy dissipation with sluice gate over a rough bed. Water 7:5115–5130Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ljubicic R, Zindovic B, Volj P, Pavlovic D, Kapor R, Savic L (2018) Hydraulic jumps in adverse-slope stilling basins for stepped spillways. Water 10:1–17Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takatsu Y, Masuoka T (2005) Transition process to turbulent flow in porous media. In: Proceedings of international mechanical engineering and exposition (IMECE 2005). Orlando, Florida USAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Higuera P, del Jesus M, Lara JL, Lusada IJ, Guanche Y, Barajas G (2011) Numerical simulation of three dimensional breaking waves on a gravel slope using two-phase flow Navier–Stokes model. In: Fifth international conference on advance computational method in engineering (ACOMEN 2011). Liege, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smeulders DMJ, van Dongen MEH (1997) Wave propagation in a porous media containing a dilute gas–liquid mixture: theory and experiments. J Fluid Mech 343:351–373MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang JG, Leung CF, Chow YK (2003) Numerical solution for flow in porous media. Int J Numer Method Anal Method Geomech 27(7):565–583zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu GR, Liu MB (2003) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a Meshfree particle method. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., SingaporezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Monaghan JJ (1992) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, annual reviews. Astron Astrophys 30(1):543–574Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Antoci C, Gallati M, Sibilla S (2007) Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction by SPH. Comput Struct 85(11):879–890Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yim SC, Yuk D, Panizzo A, Di Risio M, Liu PLF (2008) Numerical simulations of wave generation by a vertical plunger using RANS and SPH models. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 134(3):143–159Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shao S, Incompressible SPH (2006) Simulation of wave breaking and overtopping with turbulence modeling. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 50(5):597–621Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lopez D, Marivela R, Garrote L (2010) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics model applied to hydraulic structures: a hydraulic jump test case. J Hydraul Res 48(1):142–158Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chang TJ, Kao HM, Chang KH, Hsu MH (2011) Numerical simulation of Shallow–Water dam break flows in open channels using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Hydrol 408:78–90Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Federico I, Marrone S, Colagrossi A, Aristodemo F, Antuono M (2012) Simulating 2D open-channel flows through a SPH model. Eur J Mech B Fluids 34:35–46MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chern MJ, Syamsuri S (2012) The effect of corrugated bed on hydraulic jump characteristic using SPH method. J Hydraul Eng 139(2):221–232Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jonsson P, Jonsen P, Andreasson P, Lundstrom TS, Hellstrom JGI (2016) Smoothed particle hydrodynamic modelling of hydraulic jumps: bulk parameters and free surface fluctuations. Engineering 8:386–402Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bayraktar OY, Citoglu GS, Caglar H, Caglar A, Arslan M, Cetin M (2018) The mechanical properties of the different cooling requirements of high temperature applied plaster. Fresenius Environ Bull 27(8):5399–5409Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brooks RM, Cetin M (2012) Application of construction demolition waste for improving performance of subgrade and subbase layers. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci 12(3):375–381Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cetin M (2015) Consideration of permeable pavement in landscape architecture. J Environ Protect Ecol 16(1):385–392Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Colagrossi A (2003) A meshless Lagrangian method for free surface and interface flows with fragmentation, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rome. ItalyGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Delorme L, Colagrossi A, Souto-Iglesias A, Zamora-Rodriguez R, Botia-Vera E (2009) A set of canonical problems in sloshing, Part I: pressure field in forced roll-comparison between experimental results and SPH. Ocean Eng 36(2):168–178Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Monaghan JJ, Kos A, Issa N (2003) Fluid motion generated by impact. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 129(6):250–259Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Capone T, Panizzo A, Cecioni C, Dalrymple RA (2007) Accuracy and stability of numerical schemes in SPH. In: Proceedings of SPHERIC second international workshop, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dalrymple RA, Rogers BD (2006) Numerical modeling of water waves with the SPH method. Coast Eng 53(2):141–147Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khayyer A, Gotoh H (2008) Development of CMPS method for accurate water-surface tracking in breaking waves. Coast Eng J 50(2):179–207Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Morris JP, Fox PJ, Zhu Y (1997) Modeling lower reynolds number incompressible flows using SPH. J Comput Phys 136(1):214–226zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gotoh H, Shibahara T, Sakai T (2001) Sub-particle-scale turbulence model for the MPS method-Lagrangian flow model for hydraulic engineering. Adv Methods Comput Fluid Dyn 9(4):339–347Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shao S, Lo EYM (2003) Incompressible SPH method for simulating Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows with a free surface. Adv Water Resour 26(7):787–800Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Blin L, Hadjadj A, Vervisch L (2003) Large Eddy simulation of turbulent flows in reversing system. J Turbul 4(1):1–9Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91(3):99–164Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lo EYM, Shao S (2002) Simulation of near-shore solitary wave mechanics by an incompressible SPH method. Appl Ocean Res 24(5):275–286Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bonet JR, Lok TSL (1999) Variational and momentum preservation aspects of smooth particle hydrodynamic formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 180(1):97–115MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Colagrossi A, Landrini M (2003) Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys 191(2):448–475zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dilts GA (1999) Moving-least-squares-particle hydrodynamics: I. Consistency and stability. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44(8):1115–1155MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Panizzo A (2004) Physical and numerical modelling of sub-aerial landslide generated waves, Ph.D. Dissertation. Universita degli studi di L’Aquila, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Crespo AJC, Gomez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple RA (2007) Boundary conditions generated by dynamic particles in SPH methods. CMC Comput Mater Contin 5(3):173–184MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Peskin CS (1977) Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J Comput Phys 25(3):220–252MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Monaghan JJ, Kos A (1999) Solitary waves on a Cretan beach. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 125(3):145–154Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chanson H (2004) The hydarulics of open channel flow : an introduction, 2nd edn. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Prinos P, Sofialidis D, Keramaris E (2003) Turbulent flow over and within a porous bed. J Hydraul Eng 129(9):720–733Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringInstitut Teknologi Adhi Tama SurabayaSurabayaIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsIslamic Azad UniversityKarajIran

Personalised recommendations