Advertisement

International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 103–111 | Cite as

A Concept for the Estimation of Soil-Tool Abrasive Wear Using ASTM-G65 Test Data

  • G. Hoormazdi
  • J. Küpferle
  • A. Röttger
  • W. Theisen
  • K. HacklEmail author
Research Paper
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a new procedure for the prediction of soil-tool abrasive wear is presented which drastically reduces the duration and, therefore, the cost of simulations in comparison to conventional 3D wear modeling. The goal is to extend the experimental data from a single scratch test to the wear of mixtures by means of equations obtained from discrete element method (DEM) simulations and geometric relations. We are predicting abrasive wear with a combination of numerical and experimental approaches taking two shapes of particles into account. Single wear is quantified by measuring the width of scratch induced by a single quartz particle. Geometrical relations together with the particle’s microscopic picture are used to find the depth of scratch. DEM mixture simulations result in equations for the number of contacts and normal contact forces. Finally, the wear rate is calculated for a specific soil sample as an example to clarify the developed prediction procedure. The DEM simulations are performed using PFC\(^{3{\text {D}}}\) code for both a homogeneous soil sample and a mixture of two different soils. We are specially investigating a relation to predict the abrasive wear caused by a mixture of particles.

Keywords

Wear rate Abrasive wear Single scratch Discrete element method (DEM) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the framework of Project C4 and Project C5 of the Collaborative Research Center “Interaction Modeling in Mechanized Tunneling” (SFB 837). This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Graff L (2010) Discrete element method simulation of wear due to soil-tool interaction. PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhole S D, Yu H (1992) Abrasive wear evaluation of tillage tool materials. Lubric Eng 48(12):925–934Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swanson P, Vetter A (1985) The measurement of abrasive particle shape and its effect on wear. ASLE Trans 28(2):225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Natsis A, Petropoulos G, Pandazaras C (2008) Influence of local soil conditions on mouldboard ploughshare abrasive wear. Tribol Int 41(3):151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Käsling H, Thuro K (2010) Determining abrasivity of rock and soil in the laboratory, vol 235. In: 11th IAEG Congress, Auckland, pp 1973–1980Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beck F, Eberhard P (2015) Predicting abrasive wear with coupled Lagrangian methods. Comput Part Mech 2(1):51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tong J, Mohammad MA, Zhang J, Ma Y, Rong B, Chen D, Menon C (2010) DEM numerical simulation of abrasive wear characteristics of a bioinspired ridged surface. J Bionic Eng 7(2):175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cundall PA, Strack OD (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shimizu Y, Hart R, Cundall P (2004) Numerical modeling in micromechanics via particle methods—2004. Proceedings of the 2nd international PFC symposium, Kyoto, 28–29 Oct 2004. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ASTM (2000) G65: standard test method for measuring abrasion using the dry sand/rubber wheel apparatus. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frechen-Quarzwerk (2009) Stoffdatenblatt quarzsand F36. https://www.sdbl.quarzwerke.com
  12. 12.
    Zum Gahr KH (1987) Microstructure and wear of materials, vol 10. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cundall PA, Hart RD (1992) Numerical modelling of discontinua. Eng Comput 9(2):101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Itasca C (1999) Pfc 3d-user manual. Itasca Consulting Group, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wessels N, Hackl K (2012) Cosserat parameter identification within the frame of the discrete element method. PAMM 12(1):447–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wessels N, Hackl K (2016) Relating dem contact parameters to macroscopic material parameters. PAMM 16(1):563–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Mechanics of MaterialsRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.Department of Material Technology, Institute of MaterialsRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations