International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 553–565 | Cite as

Serviceability Performance Analysis of Concrete Box Girder Bridges Under Traffic-Induced Vibrations by Structural Health Monitoring: A Case Study

Research Paper

Abstract

The perceptible vibration of concrete box girders under traffic loads is an important topic in existing bridges, on which vehicle movement often cause vibrations too strong from the viewpoints of travelers. In this paper, the results of an extensive program of full-scale ambient vibration tests involving a 380 m concrete box girder bridge, the Cannavino bridge in Italy, are presented. The human safety assessment procedure of the bridge includes ambient vibration testing, identification of modal parameters from ambient vibration data, comparison with a detailed finite element modeling as validation of experimental measurements, comparison of peak accelerations to reference values from technical standards/literature in order to estimate the vibration level, and evaluation of safety by the use of histograms. A total of nine modal frequencies are identified for the deck structure within the frequency range of 0–10 Hz. The results of the ambient vibration survey are compared to the modal frequencies computed by a detailed three-dimensional finite element model of the bridge, obtaining a very good agreement. It emerges that a linear finite element model appears to be capable of capturing the dynamic behavior of concrete box girder bridges with very good accuracy. For each direction, experimental peak accelerations are compared to acceptable human levels available in technical standards/literature, showing that traffic loads mainly induce a vertical component of vibration on the bridge deck. Finally, the elaboration of histograms allows to assess that the bridge is exposed to clearly perceptible vertical vibrations, requiring the adoption of suitable vibration reduction devices.

Keywords

Concrete box girder bridge Traffic load Ambient vibration testing Dynamic identification Structural vibration Acceptable human levels 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is framed within the research project “DPC/ReLUIS, RS 4 - Osservatorio sismico delle strutture & monitoraggio” and within the COST Action “Quality Specifications for Roadway Bridges, Standardization at a European Level”, Action number TU1406.

References

  1. 1.
    Wilson JC, Liu T (1991) Ambient vibration measurements on a cable-stayed bridge. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 20:723–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu M, Frangopol DM, Kim S (2009) Bridge system performance assessment from structural health monitoring: a case study. J Struct Eng-ASCE 135(6):733–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ko JM, Ni YQ (2005) Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges. Eng Struct 27:1715–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deraemaeker A, Reyndersb E, De Roeckb G, Kullaac J (2008) Vibration-based structural health monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment. Mech Syst Signal Pr 22:34–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brownjohn JMW, Magalhaes F, Caetano E, Cunha A (2010) Ambient vibration re-testing and operational modal analysis of the Humber Bridge. Eng Struct 32:2003–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moghimi H, Ronagh HR (2008) Development of a numerical model for bridge-vehicle interaction and human response to traffic-induced vibration. Eng Struct 30:3808–3819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosurgi G, Bongiorno N, Pellegrino O (2016) A nonlinear model to predict drivers’ track paths along a curve. Int J Civil Eng 14(5):271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fiore A, Monaco P, Raffaele D (2012) Viscoelastic behaviour of non-homogeneous variable-section beams with postponed restraints. Comput Concrete 9(5):375–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiore A, Foti D, Monaco P, Raffaele D, Uva G (2013) An approximate solution for the rheological behavior of non-homogeneous structures changing the structural system during the construction process. Eng Struct 46:631–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quaranta G, Fiore A, Marano GC (2014) Optimum design of prestressed concrete beams using constrained differential evolution algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(3):441–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Colapietro D, Fiore A, Netti A, Fatiguso F, Marano GC, De Fino M, Cascella D, Ancona A (2013) Dynamic identification and evaluation of the seismic safety of a masonry bell tower in the south of Italy. In COMPDYN 2013–4th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, Kos Island, Greece, 12–14 June 2013Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Magalhães F, Cunha Á (2011) Explaining operational modal analysis with data from an arch bridge. Mech Syst Signal Pr 25:1431–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Altunişik AC, Bayraktar A, Sevim B (2012) Operational modal analysis of a scaled bridge model using EFDD and SSI methods. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 19:320–330Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cury A, Cremona C, Dumoulin J (2012) Long-term monitoring of a PSC box girder bridge. Mech Syst Signal Pr 33:13–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bayraktar A, Altunişik AC, Türker T (2016) Structural condition assessment of Birecik highway bridge using operational modal analysis. Int J Civil Eng 14(1):35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peeters B, De Roeck G (2001) Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: a review. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 123(4):659–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peeters B, De Roeck G (1999) Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Pr 13(6):855–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Overschee P, Moor BD (1996) Subspace Identification for Linear Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fiore A, Monaco P (2009) POD-based representation of the alongwind Equivalent Static Force for long-span bridges. Wind Struct 12(3):239–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mallock HRA (1902) Vibrations produced by the working of traffic on the Central London Railway. Board of Trade Report, Command PapersGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith JW (1988) Vibration of structures, application in civil engineering design. Chapman and Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bachmann H, Pretlove AJ, Rainer H (1995) Human response to vibrations. In Vibration problems in structures: practical guidelines. Birkhäuser Verlag, BaselCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    European Committee for Standardization (2002) Eurocode 2002. Basis of Structural Design—prAnnex A2. EN1990. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    International Standards ISO 2631/2-1989 (E) (1989) International organization for standards. Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—part 2: continuous and shock induced vibration in buildings (1–80 Hz). International Standards ISO 2631/2-1989 (E), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ministerio de Fomento Direcció n General de Carreteras (1999) Recomendaciones para la realización de pruebas de carga de recepción én puentes de carreteraGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureTechnical University of BariBariItaly
  2. 2.College of Civil EngineeringFuzhou UniversityFuzhou 350108China

Personalised recommendations