Advertisement

Damage Evaluation of Protected and Non-protected Composite Sandwich Panels with Insulation Subjected to Fire and Impact Loads

  • A. Sepehri
  • E. SelahiEmail author
Research paper
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, by employing ANSYS Workbench software and three-dimensional finite element simulation, the damage of fire insulated composite sandwich panels subjected to fire and impact loads is estimated. Also, an innovative method was introduced to protect composite sandwich panels with high exposure risk of fire and impact simultaneously. For this purpose, at first, the structure is subjected to impact of a projectile disk and the damage caused in the structure is estimated. Later, the structure is subjected to heat of the fire caused by hydrocarbon fuel. To demonstrate the validity and precision of the presented simulations, the obtained results are compared with the experimental and numerical results presented in the available literature. In all simulations, the properties of the laminated composite skins and core foam are temperature dependent. This research shows some practical results that can be helpful for design of composite sandwich panels with the risk of exposing fire and impact loads.

Keywords

Composite sandwich panels Damage Protected insulation Fire Impact 

References

  1. Anjang A, Chevali VS, Kandare E, Mouritz AP, Feih S (2014) Tension modelling and testing of sandwich composites in fire. Compos Struct 113:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anjang A, Chevali VS, Lattimer BY, Case SW, Feih S, Mouritz AP (2015) Post-fire mechanical properties of sandwich composite structures. Compos Struct 132:1019–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anjang A, Chevali VS, Feih S, Mouritz AP (2016) Deterioration of the fire structural resistance of sandwich composite under tension due to water absorption. Compos Part A 87:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asaro RJ, Lattimer B, Ramroth W (2009) Structural response of FRP composites during fire. Compos Struct 87:382–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bai Y, Keller T (2007) Modeling of post-fire stiffness of E-glass fiber-reinforced polyester composites. Compos Part A 38:2142–2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bai YU, Keller T (2009) Modeling of strength degradation for fiber-reinforced polymer composites in fire. J Compos Mater 43:2371–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birman V, Kardomateas GA, Simitses GJ, Li R (2006) Response of a sandwich panel subject to fire or elevated temperature on one of the surfaces. Compos Part A 37:981–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clegg RA, White DM, Riedel W, Harwick W (2006) Hypervelocity impact damage prediction in composites: part I—material model and characterization. Int J Impact Eng 33:190–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feih S, Mathys Z, Gibson AG, Mouritz AP (2007a) Modelling the compression strength of polymer laminates in fire. Compos Part A 38:2354–2365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feih S, Mathys Z, Gibson AG, Mouritz AP (2007b) Modelling the tension and compression strengths of polymer laminates in fire. Compos Sci Technol 67:551–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feih S, Mathys Z, Gibson AG, Mouritz AP (2008) Modeling compressive skin failure of sandwich composites in fire. J Sandw Struct Mater 10:217–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feih S, Mouritz AP, Mathys Z, Gibson AG (2010) Fire structural modeling of polymer composites with passive thermal barrier. J Fire Sci 28:141–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galgano A, Blasi CD, Branca C, Milella E (2009) Thermal response to fire of a fibre-reinforced sandwich panel: model formulation, selection of intrinsic properties and experimental validation. Polym Degrad Stab 94:1267–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galgano A, Blasi CD, Milella E (2010) Sensitivity analysis of a predictive model for the fire behavior of a sandwich panel. Polym Degrad Stab 95:2430–2444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gu P, Asaro RJ (2009) Designing sandwich polymer matrix composite panels for structural integrity in fire. Compos Struct 88:461–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gu P, Dao M, Asaro RJ (2009) Structural stability of polymer matrix composite panels in fire. Mar Struct 22:354–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Henderson JB, Wiebelt JA, Tant MR (1985) A model for the thermal response of polymer composite materials with experimental verification. J Compos Mater 19:579–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kandare E, Griffin GJ, Feih S, Gibson AG, Lattimer BY, Mouritz AP (2012) Fire structural modelling of fibre–polymer laminates protected with an intumescent coating. Compos Part A 43:793–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kardomateas GA, Simitses GJ, Birman V (2009) Structural integrity of composite columns subject to fire. J Compos Mater 43:1015–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim M, Choe J, Lee DG (2017) Development of the fire-retardant sandwich structure using an aramid/glass hybrid composite and a phenolic foam-filled honeycomb. Compos Struct 158:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lua J (2011) Hybrid progressive damage prediction model for loaded marine sandwich composite structures subjected to a fire. Fire Technol 47:851–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luo Ch, Lua J, DesJardin PE (2012) Thermo-mechanical damage modeling of polymer matrix sandwich composites in fire. Compos Part A 45:814–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mouritz AP, Gardiner CP (2002) Compression properties of fire-damaged polymer sandwich composites. Compos Part A 33:609–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mouritz AP, Gibson AG (2006) Fire properties of polymer composite materials. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Mouritz AP, Mathys Z (1999) Post-fire mechanical properties of marine polymer composites. Compos Struct 47:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mouritz AP, Mathys Z (2000) Mechanical properties of fire-damaged glass-reinforced phenolic composites. Fire Mater 24:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saldi ZS, Wen JX (2017) Modeling thermal response of polymer composite hydrogen cylinders subjected to external fires. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:7513–7520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Selahi E (2016) Strength, performance and modeling of composite structures subjected to fire. Islamic Azad University,Marvdasht Branch Publications, Iran (In Persian) Google Scholar
  29. Selahi E, Sepehri A, Rajab I, Dehghanian A (2012) Transient thermo-mechanical modeling of insulated composite sandwich panels under combined fire and shock loadings. In: 20th Annual international conference on mechanical engineering (ISME2012), Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran,Google Scholar
  30. Shokrieh MM, Abdolvand H (2011) Three-dimensional modeling and experimental validation of heat transfer in polymer matrix composites exposed to fire. J Compos Mater 45:1953–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang Y, Wanga YC, Bailey CG, Taylor AP (2012) Global modelling of fire protection performance of intumescent coating under different cone calorimeter heating conditions. Fire Saf 50:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ziqing Y, Aixi Z (2009) Modeling of composite panel under fire and compression. American Composites Manufacturers Association, Composites and Polycon, TampaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringShiraz UniversityShirazIran
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marvdasht BranchIslamic Azad UniversityMarvdashtIran

Personalised recommendations