Advertisement

Application of Soft Computing Techniques for River Flow Prediction in the Downstream Catchment of Mahanadi River Basin Using Partial Duration Series, India

  • Nibedita GuruEmail author
  • Ramakar Jha
Research Paper
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

The delta region of the Mahanadi river basin is faced with high floods having arisen many questions like (1) due to the release of Hirakud dam, (2) due to the middle region catchment contribution (Tel tributary at Kantamal station and Ong tributary at Salebhata station) and (3) due to an increase in heavy rainfalls over the basin. To answer this, we choose the partial duration series (PDS) having an average number of flood peaks per year (λ = 3) at Naraj based on the capacity of the existing embankment which mitigates floods up to 28,400 m3/s and analyze the trends of peak discharge of PDS having λ = 3 at the Naraj, Hirakud dam and middle region to know the flow behavior which is responsible for flooding problem in the delta of Mahanadi basin. Subsequently, the trend of extreme rainfall over the entire basin and at the middle region of the basin is analyzed. Analysis of trends of extreme floods in relation to the trends of extreme rainfall to have a proper understanding of the causes of changing floods over the basin is important. Then, runoff at Naraj is estimated based on two techniques: artificial neural networks with different algorithms and an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) using five different input combinations of peak runoff data and rainfall data of upstream locations and compare their performance based on different indices, namely correlation coefficient (R), index of agreement (d), root-mean-square error and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (E) to obtain the best input–output model. From the analysis, it is shown that ANFIS techniques as well as the neural network with Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm performs better for estimating runoff at Naraj and that gives the clear idea about the delta flooding. Also, the analysis revealed the answer arisen by many questions regarding the delta flood problem and which are due to the middle region catchment contribution and an increase in extreme rainfall.

Keywords

Trend analysis Flow prediction ANN ANFIS Mahanadi river 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like express their thanks to the National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, for providing the research environment.

References

  1. Asokan SM, Dutta D (2008) Analysis of water resources in the Mahanadi River Basin, India under projected climate conditions. Hydrol Process 22:3589–3603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chau KW et al (2010) A hybrid model coupled with singular spectrum analysis for daily rainfall prediction. J Hydroinform 12(4):458–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen XY et al (2015) A comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for downstream river flow forecasting by a hybrid neural network model. Eng Appl Artif Intell 46(A):258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawson CW, Wilby RL (1998) An artificial neural network approach to rainfall runoff modeling. Hydrol Sci J 43(1):47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demuth H, Beale M (1998) Neural network toolbox for use with MATLAB, user’s guide, version 3. The MathWorks Inc., NatickGoogle Scholar
  6. Fausett L (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks architectures, algorithms, and applications. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Gholami V et al (2015) Modeling of groundwater level fluctuations using dendrochronology in alluvial aquifers. J Hydrol 529(3):1060–1069MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghosh S, Raje D, Mujumdar PP (2010) Mahanadi stream flow: climate change impact assessment and adaptive strategies. Curr Sci 98:1084–1091Google Scholar
  9. Goldberg DE (1989) Flood routing with neural networks using genetic algorithm. In: Engineering Hydrology ASCE (ed) Proceedings. Reston, Va., pp 754–759Google Scholar
  10. Gosain AK, Rao S, Basuray D (2006) Climate change impact assessment on hydrology of Indian River basins. Curr Sci 90:346–353Google Scholar
  11. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Macmillan, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods. Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mishra SK, Behera K (2009) Development and management of water and energy resource. In: 7th International R&D Conference, 4–6 February, Bhubaneswar, OdishaGoogle Scholar
  15. Parhi PK, Mishra SK, Singh R, Tripathy VK (2012) Floods in Mahanadi river basin, Orissa (India): a critical review. India Water Week. Water, Energy and Food Security: Call for Solutions, 10–14 April, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  16. Patterson D (1996) Artificial neural networks. Prentice-Hall, SingaporezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Raje D, Mujumdar PP (2009) A conditional random field-based downscaling method for assessment of climate change impact on multisite daily precipitation in the Mahanadi basin. Water Resour Res 45:W10404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rao PG (1993) Climatic changes and trends over a major river basin in India. Climate Res 2:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rao PG (1995) Effect of climate change on stream flows in the Mahanadi river basin, India. Water Int 20:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1379–1389MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seo Y, Kim S, Kisi O, Singh VP (2015) Daily water level forecasting using wavelet decomposition and artificial intelligence techniques. J Hydrol 520:224–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15(1):116–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taormina R et al (2015) Data-driven input variable selection for rainfall-runoff modeling using binary-coded particle swarm optimization and Extreme Learning Machines. J Hydrol 529(3):1617–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang W, Xu D, Chau K, Chen S (2013) Improved annual rainfall-runoff forecasting using PSO-SVM model based on EEMD. J Hydroinform 15(4):1377–1390.  https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2013.134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang WC et al (2015) Improving forecasting accuracy of annual runoff time series using ARIMA based on EEMD decomposition. Water Resour Manag 29(8):2655–2675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu CL et al (2010) Prediction of rainfall time series using modular artificial neural networks coupled with data preprocessing techniques. J Hydrol 389(1–2):146–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu J, Chen Y, Bai L, Xu Y (2016) A hybrid model to simulate the annual runoff of the Kaidu River in northwest China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20(4):1447–1457.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1447-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations