Synthesis of MnO2 Nanoparticles in the Presence and Absence of Ultrasonic Irradiation

  • Parvin Yaghoubi
  • Abazar HajnorouziEmail author
  • Mohammad Safi Rahmanifar
  • Amir Hossein Foruzan
Research Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Physics


Previous studies show that ultrasound has a critical role in the synthesis of nanoparticles. In this paper, we compare the synthesis of MnO2 nanoparticles in the presence and absence of ultrasonic waves. The reaction efficiency is measured by the back titration method. The purity, phase, and morphology of the prepared samples are analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). The surface area and total pore volume are measured by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis. The results showed that the reaction efficiency reached 95% in the presence of ultrasonic waves during only 20 min, while it needed more than 6 h to reach such efficiency in the absence of ultrasonic waves. The XRD analysis and FESEM images showed that both samples were MnO2 nanoparticles and their phase was α. The increased synthesis rate is due to the production of free radicals during water sonolysis. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms displayed mesoporous nanoparticles with a pore size in the range of 2–10 nm for both samples. The surface area was 28.092 m2/g for samples under ultrasonic irradiation and 77.533 m2/g for other samples. A decrease of 2.75 times in the surface area was demonstrated for samples under ultrasonic irradiation. Also, the total pore volume of samples under ultrasonic irradiation was 1.85 times less than that of other samples. The reduction in the surface area and total pore volume is due to the role of the shock wave phenomenon in ultrasound irradiation. The shock wave increases the collision among nanoparticles and the adhesion among them. Based on the analysis of FESEM images, a new index is introduced describing the cohesiveness of the samples. This measure is compatible with the results of the BET analysis and shows increased adhesion among nanoparticles.


Ultrasonic waves MnO2 nanoparticles Image analysis Shock wave Free radical species 


  1. Abulizi A, Yang GH, Okitsu K, Zhu J-J (2014) Synthesis of MnO2 nanoparticles from sonochemical reduction, of MnO4(−) in water under different pH conditions. Ultrason Sonochem 21:1629–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali GAM, Tan LL, Jose R, Yusoff MM, Chong KF (2014) Electrochemical performance studies of MnO2 nanoflowers recovered from spent battery. Mater Res Bull 60:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolla MK, Choudhury HA, Moholka VS (2012) Mechanistic features of ultrasound-assisted oxidative desulfurization of liquid fuels. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:9705–9712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dengchao W, Wang D, Huang Z, Zhao J, Cui G (2010) Fabrication of nanocomposite electrode with MnO2 nanoparticles distributed in polyaniline for electrochemical capacitors. Mater Chem Phys 124:1151–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ebrahiminia A, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Toliyat T (2013) Correlation between iodide dosimetry and terephthalic acid dosimetry to evaluate the reactive radical production due to the acoustic cavitation activity. Ultrason Sonochem 20:366–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ebrahiminia A, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Toliyat T (2016) Dual frequency cavitation event sensor with iodide dosimeter. Ultrason Sonochem 28:276–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hajnorouzi A, Afzalzadeh R, Ghanati F (2014) Ultrasonic irradiation effects on electrochemical synthesis of ZnO nanostructures. Ultrason Sonochem 21(4):1435–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaneko K (1994) Review determination of pore size and pore size distribution 1. Adsorbents and catalysts. J Membr Sci 96:59–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuppa R, Moholka VS (2010) Physical features of ultrasound-enhanced heterogeneous permanganate oxidation. Ultrason Sonochem 17:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li Z, Gu A, Lou Z, Sun J, Zhou Q, Chan KY (2017) Facile synthesis of iron-doped hollow urchin-like MnO2 for supercapacitors. J Mater Sci 52:4852–4865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moghimi-Rad J, Zabihi F, Hadi I, Ebrahimi S, Isfahani T, Sabbaghzadeh J (2010) Effect of ultrasound radiation on the size and size distribution of synthesized copper particles. J Mater Sci 45:3804–3811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mylarappa M, Venkata Lakshmi V, Vishnu Mahesh KR, Nagaswarupa HP, Prashantha SC, Siddeswara DMK, Raghavendra N (2016) Electro chemical and photo catalytic studies of MnO2 nanoparticle from waste dry cell batteries. Nanosyst Phys Chem Math 7(4):657–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nayak PK, Munichandraiah N (2012) Rapid sonochemical synthesis of mesoporous MnO2 for supercapacitor applications. Mater Sci Eng B 177:849–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Okitsu K, Iwatani M, Nanzai B, Nishimura R, Maeda Y (2009) Sonochemical reduction of permanganate to manganese dioxide: the effects of H2O2 formed in the sonolysis of water on the rates of reduction. Ultrason Sonochem 16:387–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Okitsu K, Iwatani M, Okano K, Helal Uddin M, Nishimura R (2016) Mechanism of sonochemical reduction of permanganate to manganese dioxide in aqueous alcohol solutions: reactivities of reducing species formed by alcohol sonolysis. Ultrason Sonochem 3:456–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raj BGS, Asiri AM, Qusti A, Wu QJ, Anandan S (2014) Sonochemically synthesized MnO2 nanoparticles as electrode material for supercapacitors. Ultrason Sonochem 21:1933–1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Suslick KS, Price GJ (1999) Applications of ultrasound to materials chemistry. Annu Rev Mater Sci 29:295–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wei H, Wang J, Yang S, Zhang Y, Li T, Zhao S (2016) Facile hydrothermal synthesis of one-dimensional nanostructured α-MnO2 for supercapacitors. Phys E 83:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang Z et al (2013) Different types of MnO2 recovered from spent LiMn2O4 batteries and their application in electrochemical capacitors. J Mater Sci 48:2512–2519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang X, Duan Y, Guan H, Liu S, Wen B (2007) Effect of doping MnO2 on magnetic properties for M-type barium ferrite. J Magn Magn Mater 311:507CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Parvin Yaghoubi
    • 1
  • Abazar Hajnorouzi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohammad Safi Rahmanifar
    • 2
  • Amir Hossein Foruzan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of Basic ScienceShahed UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Basic ScienceShahed UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical Engineering, Engineering FacultyShahed UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations