Advertisement

Investigation of Superheavy Element with Z = 120 Production Probability Via Hot Fusion Reaction

  • Ahmad AnsariEmail author
  • Nader Ghahramany
Research Paper
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Attempt is made in this paper to calculate the synthesis probability of the superheavy nucleus with atomic number 120 and compare our findings to the results obtained by other researchers. Our findings include important parameters such as the survival probability of the residue nucleus and the fission barrier height, leading to determination of the evaporation residue cross section. The fission barrier height of the nucleus with Z = 120 is calculated by a revised relation and then compared to the neutron separation energy. It is shown that the production probability of our superheavy nucleus with Z = 120 and A = 296 is higher as compared to its other isotopes, but the fission barrier height of the superheavy element 120 with mass number 299 is higher than other isotopes. The hot fusion reaction 50Ti + 249–251Cf is suggested for such synthesis.

Keywords

Synthesis Hot fusion Superheavy element Cross section 

References

  1. Adamian GG, Antonenko NV, Scheid W (2000) Isotopic dependence of fusion cross sections in reactions with heavy nuclei. Nucl Phys A 678:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonenko NV, Cherepanov EA, Nasirov AK, Permjakov VP, Volkov VV (1993) Competition between complete fusion and quasi-fission in reactions between massive nuclei. The fusion barrier. Phys Lett B 319:425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baran A, Kowal M, Reinhard P-G, Robledo LM, Staszczak A, Warda M (2015) Fission barriers and probabilities of spontaneous fission for elements with Z ≥ 100. Nucl Phys A 944:442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gates JM, Düllmann CE, Schädel M, Yakushev A, Türler A, Eberhardt K et al (2011) First superheavy element experiments at the GSI recoil separator TASCA: the production and decay of element 114 in the 244Pu(48Ca,3-4n) reaction. Phys Rev C 83:054618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ghahramany N, Ansari A (2016) Synthesis and decay process of superheavy nuclei with Z = 119–122 via hot-fusion reactions. Eur Phys J A 52:287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghahramany N, Ghanaatian M, Hooshmand M (2007) Quark-Gluon plasma model and the origin of magic numbers. Iran Phys J 1–2:35Google Scholar
  7. Ghahramany N, Gharaati Sh, Ghanaatian M (2011) New approach to nuclear binding energy in integrated nuclear model. Phys Part Nucl Lett 8:97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hofmann S, Heinz S, Mann R, Maurer J, Mnzenberg G, Antalic S et al (2016) Remarks on the fission barriers of super-heavy nuclei. Eur Phys J A 52:116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jachimowicz P, Kowal M, Skalski J (2017) Adiabatic fission barriers in superheavy nuclei. Phys Rev C 95:014303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kowal M, Jachimowicz P, Sobiczewski A (2010) Fission barriers for even–even superheavy nuclei. Phys Rev C 82:014303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuzmina N, Adamian GG, Antonenko NV, Scheid W (2012) Influence of proton shell closure on production and identification of new superheavy nuclei. Phys Rev C 85:014319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu ZH, Bao JD (2013) Possibility to produce element 120 in the 54Cr + 248Cm hot fusion reaction. Phys Rev C 87:034616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mamdouh A, Pearson JM, Rayet M, Tondeur F (2001) Fission barriers of neutron-rich and superheavy nuclei calculated with the ETFSI method. Nucl Phys A 679:337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moller P, Nix JR, Myers WD, Swiatecki WJ (1995) Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations. At Data Nucl Data Tables 59:185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oganessian YT, Utyonkov VK, Lobanov YV, Abdullin FS, Polyakov AN, Shirokovsky IV et al (2000a) Observation of the decay of 292116. Phys Rev C 63:011301(R)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oganessian YT, Utyonkov VK, Lobanov YV, Abdullin FS, Polyakov AN, Shirokovsky IV et al (2000b) Synthesis of superheavy nuclei in the 48Ca + 244Pu reaction: 288114. Phys Rev C 62:041604(R)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oganessian YT, Utyonkov VK, Lobanov YV, Abdullin FS, Polyakov AN, Sagaidak RN et al (2007) Synthesis of the isotope 282113 in the 237Np + 48Ca fusion reaction. Phys Rev C 76:011601(R)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oganessian YT, Abdullin FS, Dmitriev SN, Gostic JM, Hamilton JH, Henderson RA et al (2013) Investigation of the 243Am + 48Ca reaction products previously observed in the experiments on elements 113, 115, and 117. Phys Rev C 87:014302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seaborg GT, Loveland WD (1990) Elements beyond uranium. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Siwek-Wilczynska K, Cap T, Kowal M, Sobiczewski A, Wilczyński J (2012) Predictions of the fusion-by-diffusion model for the synthesis cross sections of Z = 114–120 elements based on macroscopic–microscopic fission barriers. Phys Rev C 86:014611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stavsetra L, Gregorich KE, Dvorak J, Ellison PA, Dragojević I, Garcia MA, Nitsche H (2009) Independent verification of element 114 production in the 48Ca + 242Pu reaction. Phys Rev Lett 103:132502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang N, Zhao EG, Scheid W, Zhou ShG (2012) Theoretical study of the synthesis of superheavy nuclei with Z = 119 and 120 in heavy-ion reactions with trans-uranium targets. Phys Rev C 85:041601(R)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Xia ChJ, Sun BX, Zhao EG, Zhou ShG (2011) Systematic study of survival probability of excited superheavy nuclei. Sci China Phys Mech 54:109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zagrebaev VI (2001) Synthesis of superheavy nuclei: nucleon collectivization as a mechanism for compound nucleus formation. Phys Rev C 64:034606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zagrebaev VI, Greiner W (2008) Synthesis of superheavy nuclei: a search for new production reactions. Phys Rev C 78:034610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zagrebaev VI, Aritomo Y, Itkis MG, Oganessian Yu, Ohta M (2001) Synthesis of superheavy nuclei: how accurately can we describe it and calculate the cross sections? Phys Rev C 65:014607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zagrebaev VI, Karpov AV, Greiner W (2012) Possibilities for synthesis of new isotopes of superheavy elements in fusion reactions. Phys Rev C 85:014608CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and Biruni Observatory, College of ScienceShiraz UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations