Advertisement

Recognizing Galois representations of K3 surfaces

  • Christian KlevdalEmail author
Research
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Under the assumption of the Hodge, Tate and Fontaine–Mazur conjectures we give a criterion for a compatible system of \(\ell \)-adic representations of the absolute Galois group of a number field to be isomorphic to the second cohomology of a K3 surface. This is achieved by producing a motive M realizing the compatible system, using a local to global argument for quadratic forms to produce a K3 lattice in the Betti realization of M and then applying surjectivity of the period map for K3 surfaces to obtain a complex K3 surface. Finally we use a very general descent argument to show that the complex K3 surface admits a model over a number field.

Notes

Author's contributions

Acknowledgements

It is a pleasure to thank Stefan Patrikis, for suggested this problem to me, for his patient guidance and for the many helpful discussions we had. I would also like to thank Domingo Toledo for some helpful discussions. The author was partially supported by NSF DMS 1246989.

References

  1. 1.
    André, Y.: Une introduction aux motifs: motifs purs, motifs mixtes, périodes. Société mathématique de France (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baldi, G.: Local to global principle for the moduli space of K3 surfaces. arXiv:1802.02042 (2018)
  3. 3.
    Bourbaki, N.: Algebra II: Chapters 4–7. Springer, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cassels, J.W.S.: Rational Quadratic Forms. Courier Dover Publications, Mineola (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Derome, G.: Descente algébriquement close. J. Algebra 266(2), 418–426 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huybrechts, D.: A global Torelli theorem for hyperkähler manifolds (after Verbitsky). Séminaire Bourbaki 1040 (2010–2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huybrechts, D.: Lectures on K3 Surfaces, vol. 158. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huybrechts, D.: Motives of isogenous K3 surfaces. arXiv:1705.04063 (2017)
  9. 9.
    Ihara, Y., Nakamura, H.: Some illustrative examples for anabelian geometry in high dimensions. Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 1(242), 127–138 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jannsen, U.: Motives, numerical equivalence, and semi-simplicity. Invent. Math. 107(1), 447–452 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma, S.: Twisted Fourier–Mukai number of a 3 surface. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 362(1), 537–552 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moonen, B.: A remark on the Tate conjecture. arXiv:1709.04489 (2017)
  13. 13.
    Patrikis, S., Voloch, J., Zarhin, Y.: Anabelian geometry and descent obstructions on moduli spaces. Algebra Number Theory 10(6), 1191–1219 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rizov, J.: Moduli stacks of polarized K3 surfaces in mixed characteristic. Serdica Math. J. 32, 131–178 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schneps, L., Lochak, P.: Geometric Galois Actions. In: London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 242 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tankeev, S.G.: K3 surfaces over number fields and the Mumford–Tate conjecture. Math. USSR Izvestiya 37(1), 191 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toledo, D.: Projective varieties with non-residually finite fundamental group. Publ. Math. l’Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 77(1), 103–119 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Voisin, C.: Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry. In: I. volume 76 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zarhin, Y.G.: Hodge groups of K3 surfaces. J. Reine Angew. Math. 341(193–220), 54 (1983)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations