Advertisement

Bifurcation and global stability in an eco-epidemic model with refuge

  • Chandan Maji
  • Dipak Kesh
  • Debasis MukherjeeEmail author
Original Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, we formulate a predator–prey–pathogen model in which the predator is specialist in nature and infected prey can undergo refugia of constant size to avoid predator attack. To investigate the predation effect on the epidemics, we take a situation where the predator eats infected prey only. This is in accordance with the fact that the infected individuals are less active and can be caught more easily. Though it is a well-known fact that consumption of infected prey may harm predator population, the opposite holds in few cases. This leads to a controlled measure of disease prevalence. As predator consumes a particular type of prey species, Holling type II functional response is appropriate. This corroborates to the specialist type of predator. For biological validity of the model, boundedness of the system is studied. The dynamical behavior of the model has been analyzed throughly. Model analysis shows that all the population remains in coexistence when predator consumes the infected prey rather than the susceptible one. The results establish the fact that the effects of refuge used by prey decrease the equilibrium density of susceptible prey population, whereas the opposite holds for infected prey population. However, equilibrium density of predator may decrease or increase by increasing the amount of prey refuge. Global stability of the coexistence equilibrium point is developed by using Li and Muldowney’s high-dimensional Bendixson’s criterion. Numerical simulations are performed to validate our theoretical results.

Keywords

Eco-epidemic model Prey refuge Global stability Hopf bifurcation Persistence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions for improving the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Bera SP, Maiti A, Samanta GP (2015) A prey–predator model with infection in both prey and predator. Filomat 29(8):1753–1767.  https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1508753B MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Berryman AA, Lima M, Hawkins BA (2002) Population regulation, emergent properties, and a requiem for density dependence. Oikos 99:600–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birkhoff G, Rota CG (1982) Ordinary differential equation. Ginn and Co., BostonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Collings JB (1995) Bifurcation and stability analysis of a temperature-dependent mite predator-prey interaction model incorporating a prey refuge. Bull Math Biol 57:63–76CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobson AP (1988) The population biology of parasite-induced changes in host behavior. Q Rev Biol 63:139–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duffy MA, Sivars-Becker L (2007) Rapid evolution and ecological host–parasite dynamics. Ecol Lett 10:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dutta H (2017) Insights into the impacts of four current environmental problems on flying birds. Energy Ecol Environ 2(5):329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan M, Michael Y, Wang K (2001) Global stability of an SEIS epidemic model with recruitment and a varying total population size. Math Biosci 170:199–208MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Flick AJ, Acevedo MA, Elderd BD (2016) The negative effects of pathogen-infected prey on predators: a meta-analysis. Oikos 125(11):1554–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gause GF, Smaragdova NP, Witt AA (1936) Further studies of interaction between predators and prey. J Anim Ecol 5:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gonzalez-Olivares E, Ramos-Jiliberto R (2003) Dynamic consequences of prey refuges in a simple model system: more prey, fewer predators and enhanced stability. Ecol Model 166:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hadeler KP, Freedman HI (1989) Predator–prey populations with parasitic infection. J Math Biol 27:609–631MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Haque M, Venturino E (2009) Modelling disease spreading in symbiotic communities, wildlife destruction, conservation and biodiversity. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassell MP (1978) The dynamics of arthropod predator–prey systems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Hassell MP, May RM (1973) Stability in insect host–parasite models. J Anim Ecol 42:693–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hethcote H, Wang W, Han L, Ma Z (2004) A predator–prey model with infected prey. Theor Popul Biol 66:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hochberg ME, Holt RD (1995) Refuge evolution and the population dynamics of coupled host–parasitoid associations. Evol Ecol 9:633–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holt RD, Roy M (2007) Predation can increase the prevalence of infectious disease. Am Nat 169:690–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holmes JC, Bethal WM (1972) Modifications of intermediate host behavior by parasites. In: Canning EV, Wright CA (eds) Behavioural aspects of parasite transmission. Suppl I to Zool. f Linnean Soc vol 51, pp 123–149Google Scholar
  20. Hoy MA (1985) Almonds (California). In: Helle W, Sabelis MW (eds) Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control, World Crop Pests, vol 1B. Elesvier, Amsterdam, pp 229–310Google Scholar
  21. Hsieh YH, Hsiao CK (2008) Predator–prey model with disease infection in both populations. Math Med Biol 25:247–266CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang Y, Chen F, Zhong L (2006) Stability analysis of a prey–predator model with Holling type III response function incorporating a prey refuge. Appl Math Comput 182:672–683MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Hutson V (1984) A theorem on average Lyapunov function. Monatsh Math 98:267–275MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Hudson PJ, Dobson AP, Newborn D (1992) Do parasite make prey vulnerable to predation Red grouse and parasite. J Anim Ecol 61:681–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson PTJ, Stanton DE, Preu ER, Forshay KJ, Carpentar SR (2006) Dining on disease: how interactions between infection and environment affect predation risk. Ecology 87:1973–1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kabata Z (1985) Parasites and disease of fish cultured in the tropics. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Kar TK (2006) Modelling and analysis of a harvested prey–predator system incorporating a prey refuge. J Comput Appl Math 185:19–33MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Kermack W, McKendrick A (1927) A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc R Soc A 115:700–721CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Krivan V (1998) Effects of optimal anti predator behavior of prey on predator–prey dynamics: the role of refuges. Theor Popul Biol 53:131–142CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Krivan V (2011) On the Gause predator–prey model with a refuge: a fresh look at the history. J Theor Biol 274:67–73MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Lafferty KD (1992) Foraging on prey that are modified by parasites. Am Nat 140:854–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liao CM, Yeh CH, Chen SC (2008) Predation affects the susceptibility of hard clam \(Meretrix \, lusoria\) to Hg-stressed birnavirus. Ecol Model 210:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li M, Muldowney J (1993) On Bendixson’s criterion. J Differ Equ 106:27–39MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Maynard Smith J (1974) Models in ecology. Cambridge University, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. McNair JN (1986) The effects of refuges on predator–prey interactions: a reconsideration. Theor Popul Biol 29:38–63MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Mondal R, Kesh D, Mukherjee D (2018) Influence of induced plant volatile and refuge in tritrophic model. Ener Ecol Environ 3(3):171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore J (2002) Parasites and the behaviour of animals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Mukherjee D (2014) The effect of prey refuges on a three species food chain model. Differ Equ Dyn Syst 22:413–426MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Mukherjee D (2016) The effect of refuge and immigration in a predator–prey systems in the presence of a competitor for the prey. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl 31:277–287MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Mukherjee D (2017) Study of refuge use on a predator-prey system with a competitor for the prey. Int J Biol Math 10(2):1750023.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524517500231 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Packer C, Holt RD, Hudson PJ, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP (2003) Keeping the herds healthy and alert: implications of predator control for infectious disease. Ecol Lett 6:797–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pal AK, Samanta GP (2013) A ratio-dependent eco-epidemiological model incorporating a prey refuge. Univ J Appl Math 1(2):86–100Google Scholar
  43. Ruxton GD (1995) Short term refuge use and stability of predator–prey models. Theor Popul Biol 47:1–17CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharma S, Samanta GP (2015) A Leslie–Gower predator–prey model with disease in prey incorporating a prey refuge. Chaos Slitons Fractals 70:69–84MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Sih A (1987) Prey refuges and predator–prey stability. Theor Popul Biol 31:1–12MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sotomayor J (1973) Generic bifurcations of dynamical systems. In: Peixoto MM (ed) Dynamical systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sun C, Loreau M (2009) Dynamics of a three-species food chain model with adaptive traits. Chaos Solitons Fractals 41:2812–2819MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Tewa JJ, Djeumen VY, Bowong S (2013) Predator–prey model with Holling response function of type II and SIS infectious disease. Appl Math Model 37:4825–41MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Dobben WH (1952) Sublethal effects of three ectoparasites on fish. J Fish Biol 7:283–294Google Scholar
  50. Venturino E (1994) The influence of diseases on Lotka-Volterra systems. Rocky Mt J Math 24:381–402MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. Xiao YN, Chen LS (2001) Analysis of a three species eco-epidemiological model. J Math Anal Appl 258(2):733–754MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhou XY, Shi XY, Song XY (2009) Analysis of a delay prey–predator model with disease in the prey species only. J Korean Math Soc 46(4):713–731MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Joint Center on Global Change and Earth System Science of the University of Maryland and Beijing Normal University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsVivekananda CollegeKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Centre for Mathematical Biology and EcologyJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations