Advertisement

Characterization of the anisotropic thermal conductivity of additively manufactured components by fused filament fabrication

  • Ahmed Elkholy
  • Mahmoud Rouby
  • Roger KempersEmail author
Full Research Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Recently, additive manufacturing (AM) has been successfully employed to fabricate heat exchangers due to its ability to create complex geometrical structures with high volumetric-to-area ratio, which can be designed to increase convective heat transfer from surfaces. Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most popular AM methods due to it is accessible and low-cost hardware. The effect of process parameters on the mechanical properties of FFF 3D-printed parts has been studied extensively. However, there are limited reliable data for the thermal conductivity of 3D-printed components which has impeded the development of additively manufactured heat exchangers. In the current study, the effect of the layer height and raster width have been investigated experimentally and numerically to characterize the effective thermal conductivity of 3D-printed components and investigate the thermal anisotropic nature of unidirectional printed parts. The results showed that increasing the layer height and width causes deterioration in the effective thermal conductivity of up to 65% of the pure polymer. In addition, the thermal conductivity was measured for a range of PLA composites and it was found that their anisotropic ratio can be as high as 2. The unidirectional effective conductivity model was subsequently modified to characterize the common cross-hatched layer fill configuration, and the influence of fill ratio on the effective thermal conductivity was investigated. Finally, the effective thermal conductivity of several commercially available PLA composite filaments was characterized experimentally.

Keywords

Fused filament fabrication Fused deposition modeling Printing parameters Thermal conductivity PLA Polymer composite 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ngo IL, Jeon S, Byon C (2016) Thermal conductivity of transparent and flexible polymers containing fillers: a literature review. Int J Heat Mass Transf 98:219–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.02.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ning F, Cong W, Hu Y, Wang H (2017) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: Effects of process parameters on tensile properties. J Compos Mater 51:451–462.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998316646169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar S, Kruth JP (2010) Composites by rapid prototyping technology. Mater Des 31(2):850–856.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Leon AC, Chen Q, Palaganas NB et al (2016) High performance polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing applications. React Funct Polym 103:141–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berman B, Zarb FG (2011) 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution 1. A multi-faceted technology: 3-D printing. Bus Horiz 55:155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deepa Y (2014) Fused deposition modeling—a rapid prototyping technique for product cycle time reduction cost effectively in aerospace applications. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng 5:62–68Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wong KV, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng 2012:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/208760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deisenroth DC, Moradi R, Shooshtari AH et al (2017) Review of heat exchangers enabled by polymer and polymer composite additive manufacturing. Heat Transf Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2017.1384280 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jia Y, He H, Geng Y et al (2017) High through-plane thermal conductivity of polymer based product with vertical alignment of graphite flakes achieved via 3D printing. Compos Sci Technol 145:55–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hymas DM, Arie MA, Singer F, et al (2017) Enhanced air-side heat transfer in an additively manufactured polymer composite heat exchanger, thermal and thermomechanical phenomena in electronic systems (ITherm). 16th IEEE intersociety conference on. IEEE, pp 634–638Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalsoom U, Peristyy A, Nesterenko PN, Paull B (2016) A 3D printable diamond polymer composite: a novel material for fabrication of low cost thermally conducting devices. RSC Adv 6:38140–38147.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra05261d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bakar NSA, Alkahari MR, Boejang H (2010) Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 11:972–977.  https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1001365 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Santhakumar J, Maggirwar R (2016) enhancing quality of fused deposition modeling built parts by optimizing the process variables using polycarbonate material. Inte Sci Press 9:173–181Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turner BN, Gold SA (2015) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness. Rapid Prototyping J 21:250–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu W, Geng P, Li G et al (2015) Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials (Basel) 8:5834–5846.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8095271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cantrell J, Rohde S, Damiani D et al (2011) Experimental characterization of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS and polycarbonate parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal 23(4):811–824.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Percoco G, Lavecchia F, Galantucci LM (2012) Compressive properties of FDM rapid prototypes treated with a low cost chemical finishing. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 4:3838–3842Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ashtankar KM, Kuthe AM, Rathour BS (2013) Effect of build orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyping (fused deposition modelling) made acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (abs) parts. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arivazhagan A, Saleem A, Masood SH et al (2014) Study of dynamic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling processed. Int J Eng Res Appl 7:304–312.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2014.304.312 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olivier D, Borros S, Reyes G (2010) Influence of building orientation on failure mechanism and flexural properties of low specimens. J Mech Sci Technol 00:1261–1269Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jadav RA, Solanki B (2015) Investigation on parameter optimization of fused deposition modeling (FDM) for better mechanical properties—a review. IJSRD -International J Sci Res Dev 3:2321–2613Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Álvarez K, Lagos RF, Aizpun M (2016) Investigating the influence of infill percentage on the mechanical properties of fused deposition modelled ABS parts. Ing e Investig 36:110. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v36n3.56610
  23. 23.
    Nikzad M, Masood SH, Sbarski I (2011) Thermo-mechanical properties of a highly filled polymeric composites for fused deposition modeling. Mater Des 32(6):3448–3456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nikzad M, Masood SH, Sbarski I, Groth a (2007) Thermo-mechanical properties of a metal-filled polymer composite for fused deposition modelling applications. In: 5th Australas Congr Appl Mech ACAM 1:319–324.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hwang S, Reyes EI, Sik KM et al (2015) Thermo-mechanical characterization of metal/polymer composite filaments and printing parameter study for fused deposition modeling in the 3D printing process. J Electron Mater J Electron Mater 44(3):771–777.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-014-3425-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Masood SH, Song WQ (2002) Assembly Automation Thermal characteristics of a new metal/polymer material for FDM rapid prototyping process Thermal characteristics of a new metal/polymer material for FDM rapid prototyping process. Assem Autom Rapid Prototyp J Iss Rapid Prototyp J 25:309–315.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150510626451 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laureto J, Tomasi J, King JA, Pearce JM (2017) Thermal properties of 3-D printed polylactic acid-metal composites. Prog Addit Manuf 2:57–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-017-0019-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith DS, Alzina A, Bourret J et al (2013) Thermal conductivity of porous materials. J Mater Res 28:2260–2272.  https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2013.179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mamunya YP, Davydenko VV, Pissis P, Lebedev EV (2002) Electrical and thermal conductivity of polymers filled with metal powders. Eur Polym J 38:1887–1897.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00064-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Landauer R (1952) The electrical resistance of binary metallic mixtures. J Appl Phys 23:779–784.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1702301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shemelya C, De La Rosa A, Torrado AR et al (2017) Anisotropy of thermal conductivity in 3D printed polymer matrix composites for space based cube satellites. Addit Manuf 16:186–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Flaata, Tiffaney, Gregory J. Michna TL (2017) Thermal conductivity testing apparatus for 3d printed materials thermal conductivity testing apparatus for 3d printed materials. In: ASME 2017 Heat Transfer Summer Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V002T15A006–V002T15A006Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Prajapati H, Ravoori D, Woods RL, Jain A (2018) Measurement of anisotropic thermal conductivity and inter-layer thermal contact resistance in polymer fused deposition modeling (FDM). Addit Manuf 21:84–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shofner ML, Lozano K, Rodríguez-Macías FJ, Barrera EV (2003) Nanofiber-reinforced polymers prepared by fused deposition modeling. J Appl Polym Sci 89:3081–3090.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ibrahim Y, Melenka G, Kempers R (2018) Additive manufacturing of continuous wire polymer composites. Manuf Lett 16:49–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ibrahim Y, Melenka G, Kempers R (2018) Fabrication and tensile testing of 3d printed continuous wire polymer composites. Rapid Prototyp J.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2017-0222 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yang C, Tian X, Liu T et al (2017) 3D printing for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites: mechanism. Rapid Prototyp J 23(1):209–215.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang F, Ma G, Tan Y (2017) The nozzle structure design and analysis for continuous carbon fiber composite 3D printing. Adv Eng Res 136:193–199Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tian X, Liu T, Yang C et al (2016) Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 88:198–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Masaki N, Ueda M, Todoroki A, Hirano Y, Matsuzaki R (2014) 3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced plastic. Porc Soc Adv Mater and Process Eng 45:187–196Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dizon JRC, Espera AH, Chen Q, Advincula RC (2018) Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit Manuf 20:44–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ng HY, Lu X, Lau SK (2005) Thermal conductivity of boron nitride-filled thermoplastics: effect of filler characteristics and composite processing conditions. Polym Compos 26:778–790.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kempers R, Kolodner P, Lyons A, Robinson AJ (2009) A high-precision apparatus for the characterization of thermal interface materials. Rev Sci Instrum 80(9):095111.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3193715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    ASTM C177 (2013) Standard test method for steady-state heat flux measurements and thermal transmission properties by means of the guarded-hot-plate. ASTM Int.  https://doi.org/10.1520/C0177-13.2 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kline SJ, McClintock FA (1953) Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mech Eng 75(1):3–8Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    ANSYS (2015) ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide. ANSYS 16 Doc. 15317:80Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Specialty Filament | ROBO 3D. https://robo3d.com/collections/filament-exotic. Accessed 7 Aug 2018
  48. 48.
    Proto-pasta 3D Printer Filament Made by the Makers at ProtoPlant–ProtoPlant, makers of Proto-pasta. https://www.proto-pasta.com/. Accessed 7 Aug 2018
  49. 49.
    Dehdari Ebrahimi N, Ju YS (2018) Thermal conductivity of sintered copper samples prepared using 3D printing-compatible polymer composite filaments. Addit Manuf 24:479–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gibson MA, Mykulowycz NM, Shim J et al (2018) 3D printing metals like thermoplastics: fused filament fabrication of metallic glasses. Mater Today 21:697–702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations